March 26, 2004

The Clarke "Scandal"

Iím behind the curve on this one, but I suppose I should weigh in on the Richard Clarke ďscandal.Ē

Clarkeís ability to undermine his own self with his own words is astonishing.

Iím sure heís telling the truth in there somewhere. I donít know when he is and when he isnít. At this point, none of his blatantly contradictory statements are even worth quoting. This has been covered nearly to death elsewhere. Those interested in the details can follow the link.

Matthew Yglesias doesnít think Clark has a credibility problem.

The "serious allegations" would turn on Clarke's credibility if and only if administration figures would explain in a clear manner which of the allegations are not true and what is untrue about them. They have not done so.
He has a point. Administration officials do need to counter any claims by Clarke that arenít true. Maybe they have and I missed it. Honestly, I donít really know, partly because this story bores me, and partly because I have neither the time nor the energy to parse a series of ďhe saidĒ and ďshe saidĒ counter allegations by bickering politicians.

Even so, Matt is only half right. Clarke is perfectly capable of creating a credibility problem all by himself. That is independent of the fact that the Bush Administration may also have its own credibility problems.

I could be wrong, obviously, but I have feeling this guy is as ephemeral as a moth. Heíll be a footnote in two weeks and his book will be consigned to the remainder bins.

Iím sorry if this is a flip and lazy response. It is. I know it is. But the man hasnít demonstrated heís worth my time. He seems to me an arrogant self-aggrandizing phony. He isnít even up to speed enough to know that his previous statements are all over the Internet, that those who are interested can compare and contrast what heís saying now with what he has said in the past.

If youíre interested in some truly devastating criticism of pre-911 government failure, read what Bob Kerrey, the former Democratic senator from Nebraska, had to say. Heís a man worth taking seriously. If I were Bush I would be very afraid of facing an opponent like him. He is relentless, and he is right.

Posted by Michael J. Totten at March 26, 2004 12:23 AM
Winner, The 2007 Weblog Awards, Best Middle East or Africa Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member


"I'm flattered such an excellent writer links to my stuff"
Johann Hari
Author of God Save the Queen?

Andrew Sullivan
Author of Virtually Normal

"Brisk, bracing, sharp and thoughtful"
James Lileks
Author of The Gallery of Regrettable Food

"A hard-headed liberal who thinks and writes superbly"
Roger L. Simon
Author of Director's Cut

"Lively, vivid, and smart"
James Howard Kunstler
Author of The Geography of Nowhere

Contact Me

Send email to michaeltotten001 at gmail dot com

News Feeds


Link to Michael J. Totten with the logo button


Tip Jar


Terror and Liberalism
Paul Berman, The American Prospect

The Men Who Would Be Orwell
Ron Rosenbaum, The New York Observer

Looking the World in the Eye
Robert D. Kaplan, The Atlantic Monthly

In the Eigth Circle of Thieves
E.L. Doctorow, The Nation

Against Rationalization
Christopher Hitchens, The Nation

The Wall
Yossi Klein Halevi, The New Republic

Jihad Versus McWorld
Benjamin Barber, The Atlantic Monthly

The Sunshine Warrior
Bill Keller, The New York Times Magazine

Power and Weakness
Robert Kagan, Policy Review

The Coming Anarchy
Robert D. Kaplan, The Atlantic Monthly

England Your England
George Orwell, The Lion and the Unicorn