August 24, 2005

Why Israel Has to Leave Now or Later

Pat Robertson proves himself a foreign policy dumbass twice in one week. First he pops off about assassinating Hugo Chavez. Now he rails against Israelis for doing what must, at some point, be done.

Pat Robertson, one of the leading television evangelists in the US, has sharply criticized the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and said God will judge those who leave parts of the land of Israel.

Speaking on his daily TV show aired on the Christian Broadcasting Network, Robertson said "the almighty God said he was going to judge the nation which has parted from his land and that he was going to bring judgment upon that nation."

Robertson's comments on the Gaza withdrawal were quoted on the Christian Coalition of America Web site.

Robertson has been a long supporter of the settlement movement and a strong opponent of the disengagement plan. As many other evangelical leaders in the US, Robertson believes that the historic land of Israel should be under Jewish rule.
Israel has four options.

1) Rule the West Bank and Gaza forever while denying Palestinians citizenship and equal rights. Basically, this is the South African apartheid model. The fact that Israel acquired those lands in self-defense in 1967 doesn't change that.
2) Grant citizenship and equal rights to Palestinians. This would make Jews an ethnic minority in Israel only a few years from now. They'll never do it.
3) Forcibly relocate (in other words, ethnically cleanse) Palestinians out of the West Bank and Gaza.
4) Withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza.

A debate over when Israel should withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza is an argument worth having. Perhaps it’s best that Sharon is pulling out of Gaza now. Maybe it would be better if he waited. We won’t really know for certain until we can look back in hindsight and see what happens next.

But if “Israel should be under Jewish rule” forever, as Pat Robertson claims, that means Israel has to choose one of the first three options. None are even remotely viable. Jewish morality and experience rightly forbids options one and three. Hardly anyone on either the Israeli or the Palestinian side has any desire to see option two implemented. That leaves only option four. The West Bank and Gaza will not, cannot, remain under Jewish rule. Israelis leave now or later because they have no other choice.

Posted by Michael J. Totten at August 24, 2005 02:48 PM
Comments

This latest does have the fringe (irony intended) benefit of showing the idiots that Robertson isn't telling the White House what to do. Not that they will let facts get in their way, of course.

Posted by: exhelodrvr at August 24, 2005 03:15 PM

Strike while the iron is hot, Michael.

Yes, Israel should withdraw from the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, but not from the settlements, and not without a negotiated settlement.

Is a settlement with the palestinians worth the paper it's written on? No, but it gives Israel license to act when they breach it.

Posted by: spaniard at August 24, 2005 03:27 PM
Withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza.

How about
4a- "partially" withdraw from the West Bank/Gaza, which seems to be what will actually happen in the WB? It's doubtful Israel will give back all of the WB or parts of Jerusalem.

Incidentally, 4 or 4a can also be reworded as "ethnically clense" Gaza/WB of Jews instead of Palestinians.

Posted by: h0mi at August 24, 2005 03:30 PM

Michael -- you are incorrect about Option 2. The unitary state with Jews being granted Dhimmi status is the preferred option of the Palestinian factions and the Palestinian people. This accounts for the rejectionism and the lack of any support for the Michael Collins solution.

However, Sharon seems to recognize this and I would not doubt that there are plans in place once the inevitable terrorist atrocity by Hamasastan in Gaza takes place, for some mutual ethnic cleansing on the West Bank, with population transfers on both sides and a defacto two state solution with Israel keeping a substantial portion of the West Bank.

Probably the best Israel can hope for is withdrawal as much as possible from Palestinian areas and walls, punitive responses to various attacks. I don't see peace breaking out for generations (despite most Israelis wanting some sort of settlement desperately).

And yes, Robertson is an idiot (and scam artist).

Posted by: Jim Rockford at August 24, 2005 04:31 PM

Robertson isn't getting any real support within the evangelical community for his absurd assasination talk, and even less from the administration. Israel will eventually leave the West Bank but not if a armed Hamas is allowed to operate at will within the currrent boundries of Palestine. If the P.L.O. can't manage to disarm them Israel is not going to leave. They are well armed and they do not hide their intention to destroy Israel. When they state they want their land back they want all of it,pre 48 Israel included. If the P.L.O. makes a serious effort Israel will make a deal. If they don't, they won't.

Posted by: kevinpeters at August 24, 2005 05:00 PM

If historic Palestine were returned to the Palestinians, the Jews could be repatriated to the Christian and Muslim countries they originally came from. Only fair after 50 years of brutal oppression.

Plus, most Jews are secular and have prospered wherever they have lived.

Posted by: Aazim Omar at August 24, 2005 06:03 PM

Aazim, yes, dreaming is nice.

Posted by: spaniard at August 24, 2005 06:18 PM

Dennis Ross has it right: let's see what kind of state they build in Gaza. Anything halfway decent will inspire the Israeli electorate to give up the west Bank. If not, not.
Not all the West Bank either; the parts contiguous to Israel (behind the security fence) will be retained & a land swap will even up the acreage. Inotherwords, the same deal that fell apart because of the intifadeh.
So can Hamas govern? I don't mean impose shar'ia, but actually g o v e r n. When the residents of Ward 12 ask when there'll be hot water, will they just be told "In Allah's good time; meanwhile let's all stone this adulteress?"
If that's all Hamas is going to tell them, then it'll be a long road.

Posted by: Mike Reynolds at August 24, 2005 07:15 PM

Spaniard -

How can Israel withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza, and not withdraw from the settlements? The settlements are largely what keeps the IDF pinned down in those places (also, obviously, administering road blocks and other anti-terror security measures). If anything, one could argue to remove the settlements, which serve no security function but are only ideological, and keep the army to maintain quiet until the Palestinians can finally do the job themselves.

Posted by: MarkC at August 24, 2005 09:12 PM

Yep, putting Robertson in charge of handling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would be disasterous. Almost as disasterous as pulling all of our troops out of Iraq by the end of 2006, as Russ Feingold (the new Howard Dean, mark my words because I said it first) is now suggesting.

It's a good thing neither one of these guys' are at all popular with broad swaths of the American electorate. Oh...Wait. Crap.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at August 24, 2005 09:31 PM

Perhaps one should ponder the deeper purpose behind the support of evangelical christians for jewish control over all of historical israel.
Its not, of course, for the benefit of the jewish people, but rather for the biblical prophecy of what comes after....
Hence, Robertson's agenda..

Posted by: at August 24, 2005 09:50 PM

Israel is smart doing this essentially unilaterally. They should withdraw behind the wall and then let the Palestinians do their thing. Negotiations are too difficult.

p.s. anyone know how much aid the PA has received so far?

p.s.s. Would agreee with Aazim Omar's fantasy sentiments in the sense that the state of Israel was poorly planned by the UN.

Posted by: Aaron at August 24, 2005 11:05 PM

Michael -- you are incorrect about Option 2. The unitary state with Jews being granted Dhimmi status .is the preferred option of the Palestinian factions and the Palestinian people.
*************************************************
You cannot be serious. That is not the preffered option the preferred option is to slaughter the Jews wholesale and drive the survivors into the Sea. You are correct about them preferring the One State option, but I doubt the rest of it.

The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS)-Palestine
http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/hamas.htm

Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it" (The Martyr, Imam Hassan al-Banna, of blessed memory).

Now somehow I find it hard to believe the word
obliterate translates into "with Jews being granted Dhimmi status"

The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind

8

stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews." (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem

Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement.

There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors. The Palestinian people know better than to consent to having their future, rights and fate toyed with.

Posted by: Dan Kauffman at August 24, 2005 11:07 PM

If historic Palestine were returned to the Palestinians, the Jews could be repatriated to the Christian and Muslim countries they originally came from. Only fair after 50 years of brutal oppression.

Plus, most Jews are secular and have prospered wherever they have lived.

Posted by Aazim Omar at August 24, 2005 06:03 PM
*************************************************
Where they would probably thrive in the Christian lands and be butchered in the Muslim lands that would settle the problem wouldn't it?

M

Posted by: Dan Kauffman at August 24, 2005 11:08 PM

If historic Palestine were returned to the Palestinians, the Jews could be repatriated to the Christian and Muslim countries they originally came from. Only fair after 50 years of brutal oppression.

Plus, most Jews are secular and have prospered wherever they have lived.

Posted by Aazim Omar at August 24, 2005 06:03 PM
*************************************************
Where they would probably thrive in the Christian lands and be butchered in the Muslim lands that would settle the problem wouldn't it?

M

Posted by: Dan Kauffman at August 24, 2005 11:11 PM

I agree with your assessment of the situation, but with a single caveat: there are certain areas of the West Bank which are of immense religious significance to the Jewish people, Hebron is probably the most prominent, in which Jews should be permitted to live under whatever regime eventually rules the West Bank.

Posted by: benjamin at August 24, 2005 11:31 PM

Grant -- I suspect the new Howard Dean or Deans, calling for withdrawal in 2006, will be REPUBLICANS. Hegel, probably, and a few others. And they won't be saying anything politically risky, either. The war is going that badly, the President's defense of the need to continue to stay is that unconvincing, and both this is all quite likely to continue.

Regarding Pat Robertson, I recall countless arguments last year with Republicans about the tremendous importance and relevance to national security of the fact that Jimmy Carter invited Michael Moore to sit next to him one evening at the convention. Robertson is much, much more influential with the current White House than a Moore would have been in a Kerry Administration. For instance, through his American Center for Law and Justice legal think tank, Robertson was consulted by the White House (along with Falwell) on the Roberts nomination.

Posted by: markus rose at August 24, 2005 11:33 PM

Incorporating some settlement blocs is doubtlessly in the cards. That shouldn't be a problem as long as there is a fair land swap. Camp David 2000 gave Palestinians 1 sq. mile in Israel for every NINE sq. miles of settlement bloc annexations. Taba supposedly was a fairer 3:1 ration. Why can't there be a win/win in which some Israeli Arab settlement blocs are incorporated into the new state as an exchange?

A harder problem I think is Jerusalem.

Posted by: markus rose at August 24, 2005 11:40 PM

Markus: Why can't there be a win/win in which some Israeli Arab settlement blocs are incorporated into the new state as an exchange?

Every time that idea is floated, Israeli Arabs insist they do not want to be ruled by the Palestinian Authority. This should surprise no one.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at August 25, 2005 12:13 AM

Of course, as Benny Morris points out, Gaza was never, in fact, part of the ancient Israeli kingdoms. (Ironically, where Jews primarily lived is in what is now known as the West Bank, and the coastal strip that is now considered Israel proper was largely in the hands of Gentiles.) Of course, none of this matters if you believe you have The Word Of God.

Posted by: Gary Farber at August 25, 2005 12:48 AM

"That leaves only option four. The West Bank and Gaza will not, cannot, remain under Jewish rule. Israelis leave now or later because they have no other choice."

Since option 4 was already tried and failed (Oslo, rings a bell ?), most of the Israelis think about option 5 :
- Withdraw from PARTS of the West Bank and ALL of Gaza.
- Keeping the largest jewish cities (Emmanuel, Ariel, ...) inside the israelis borders.
- Giving up the largest arab cities in the Galil (Um-el-fahem, Nazareth-Tahtit, ...) and in the Negev to the palestinian state.

Posted by: we_are_amused at August 25, 2005 02:18 AM

I suspect unilateral withdrawal, from all of Gaza and parts of the West Bank, along with unilateral land grabbing.

New settlements connecting others!

I wish Sharon would claim: 100 sq KM per each Israeli killed by terrorists. And then start annexing.

The "World Court," including unelected dictatorships and no enforcement mechanism, remains a joke.

The Israeli-bashers think Bush & America fund Israel, too much (perhaps). The Palestinian-bashers think the EU & UN fund Palis, and their terrorism (Gaza today, Jerusalem tomorrow), too much.

I'd like Sharon to accuse the EU of funding Jew murder/ terrorism. With beleif, not proof -- but a claim the EU can NOT account for much of the money they've given in "aid".

And Israel has NOT said it would annex the land, though the anti-Jewish LAT has that as its headline. Building the wall is NOT annexing; though it is pretty close.

China HAS said it has annexed Tibet. Occupation in both cases.

Posted by: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad at August 25, 2005 04:57 AM

Curious about a few things: Why does it not matter that Israel acquired the West Bank as a result of a war (actually one of four initiated by Arabs)? I would be dollars to dimes that had the Arabs there purely protested by peaceful means, indicating a strong desire to live in peace with Jews, that there would be no problem today. But since Moslems do not want to live in peace with anyone else, the Israelis are stuck with the WB.
Another alterantive: populate it with settlers to become a majority in parts of it. Annex those parts and give the trucated rest to whomever.
As for the notion of acquiring land by conquest, I'm assuming you don't plan, Michael, on giving back your home to the native Americans? Or perhaps returning California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico? And if you are looking for evil to combat, what bout Tibet, a large non-Chinese country military annexed by China where the native culture is being choked off. You know, if you want a cause or something.

If the Arabs really want to live in peace with Jews, then let them demonstrate that. Perhaps after a decade or so of truely peaceful existence it would be time to discuss land.

Posted by: Seymour Paine at August 25, 2005 05:29 AM

Hehe, Robertson makes a great argument for separation of church and state.

Posted by: TallDave at August 25, 2005 05:55 AM

As for the notion of acquiring land by conquest, I'm assuming you don't plan, Michael, on giving back your home to the native Americans?

Native americans get to vote in elections.

It's a simple point - if someone is born within your borders, never leaves them, never does anything to disqualify himself from voting, but can't get onto the electoral roll, then something is wrong. If the number of people in that category is significant, then the country in question is not a democracy.

soru

Posted by: soru at August 25, 2005 06:16 AM

Allow me to be the Devil's Advocate here and support option # 3:

While today, we publically regard population transfer as immoral, the fact is that it was not only considered the right thing to do quite often during the 20th century, but we all benefit from those transers today. One example was the mass expulsion of Germans from various areas after WW2. To quote from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_expulsions:
"The process, aiming at ethnically homogenous nation states started before the Potsdam Conference... This German deportation and migration affected up to 16.5 million Germans and was the largest of several similar post-World War 2 migrations orchestrated by victorious Western Allies and the Soviet Union, which included the resettlements of millions of Poles, Ukranians and Jews.

Also look at the creation of Pakistan-- 11 million Muslims and Hindus switched sides.

Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_transfer for a pretty complete summary of population transfers.

Posted by: A Berman at August 25, 2005 06:54 AM

Robertson is much, much more influential with the current White House than a Moore would have been in a Kerry Administration.

Markus,

the Michael Moore/Pat Robertson comparisons aren't going to get you any traction because our rightwing nutjobs aren't traitorous America-hating nutjobs. It's not their nuttiness that makes people hate these guys, it's their anti-Americanism. See the diff?

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 08:10 AM

Why can't there be a win/win in which some Israeli Arab settlement blocs are incorporated into the new state as an exchange?

Markus,

can you give me the name of an "Israeli Arab" settlement bloc? I don't think they exist.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 08:20 AM

our rightwing nutjobs aren't traitorous America-hating nutjobs

right. like for instance, they would never say that America deserved 9/11, or that Osama was doing God's work in smiting the homo-femininst-loving decadent west.

Posted by: portugese at August 25, 2005 09:18 AM

portuguese,

that just goes to show that it takes more than one isolated comment taken out of context for the label to stick, unlike the Left which has been at it for decades.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 09:27 AM

Seymour Paine: I'm assuming you don't plan, Michael, on giving back your home to the native Americans?

Of course not. Native Americans are citizens of this country. Palestinians are not citizens of Israel.

That's the difference.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at August 25, 2005 09:51 AM

That's the difference.

That's why Israel has not annexed the WB, but has instead build settlements on unpopulated patches of it.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 10:15 AM

michael -- "Every time that idea is floated, Israeli Arabs insist they do not want to be ruled by the Palestinian Authority. This should surprise no one."

I believe the preference of Arabs to live in Israel rather than the future Palestinian state would lessen if a) real democratic reforms were instituted in the PA, which Sharon and Bush have both indicated is a PRECONDITION for a transfer of sovereignty; b) the Palestinian state was large and contiguous enough to be economically viable.

Given this Arab preference, however, here's another win/win: allow blocs of settlers to remain in the West Bank in exchange for a comparable number of refugees, willing to also live under Israeli citizenship, to join their Israeli Arab brethren.

spaniard -- "name of an Israeli Arab settlement bloc"

My understanding of Israeli Palestinians (they apparently dislike the term "Israeli Arabs") is that they live in seperate neighborhoods and interact very little, as a rule, with the Jewish majority. I don't have exact names, but according to Freedom House: "The Israeli-Arabs live mainly in the north, in the center (triangle), in mixed towns, and in the Negev where the Bedouins live."

www.mideasti.org/articles/doc22.html

On your other point, spaniard, I agree that "anti-American" is a more serious accusation than "nutty." The problem is, it is just a vague and subjective of a judgement as nuttiness as well. Michael Moore certainly considers himself to be coming ought of a very American and very old populist tradition, and vigorously denies that anything he stands for is "anti-American." A traditional conservative, like Pat Buchanan, meanwhile, probably agrees with this point, and considers a pro-immigration, pro-free trade neo-con to be much more ANTI-AMERICAN, and a much bigger threat to our country, than he considers Michael Moore and his ilk to be.

Posted by: markus at August 25, 2005 10:49 AM

one isolated comment taken out of context for the label to stick

The label to stick? You mean with people like you, of course. You will surely consider a label to be sticking if you hear it on Fox AND Rush ANd read it on the rightwing blogs in the same time period.
And it aint a isolated comment - its a philosphy deeply at odds with the liberal democratic nature of the west - its shaping philosophy ever since the Enlightenment.
Religous fundamentalism is the enemy, including the relativly milder forms we have in this country.

Posted by: porto at August 25, 2005 10:55 AM

Markus,

I get what you're saying-- swap Israeli settlement land for Israeli Arab land. Not gonna happen for the reason Michael gave.

Re "anti-American", more important than how Michael Moore or Pat Robertson perceive themselves is how regular joe blow perceives them. The Left has earned their rep over decades.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 10:59 AM

"...how regular joe blow perceives them. The Left has earned their rep over decades."

Your basic point is correct, which is why Cindy Sheehan is so potentially dangerous to Bush, and why war supporters need to mention "David Duke" and "Michael Moore" and "moveon.org" in every other breath while talking about her. If Joe Blow perceives that to be anti-war and against the neoconservative agenda is not necessarily to be anti-American or antisemitic, then the Administration and its war effort is really in trouble.

I'd go so far as to say the real threat to Bush and to the Republican control in Congress is not from the terminally muddled Democrats, but rather from a Buchananite backlash: a bunch of Joe Blows, already deeply pissed at tacit Republican support for illegal immigration, coming to the realization that the war hasn't made us safer, and deciding to stay home in the '06 elections, or to vote for Pat Hackett type challengers.

Posted by: markus rose at August 25, 2005 12:45 PM

Your basic point is correct, which is why Cindy Sheehan is so potentially dangerous to Bush, and why war supporters need to mention "David Duke" and "Michael Moore" and "moveon.org" in every other breath while talking about her.

No doubt both sides are trying to frame Mama Sheehan to their advantage. The question is therefore who's framing is more accurate. Given Mama Sheehan's propensity to repeat almost rote the same inneffective platitudes being fed to her by moveon.org, it hasn't been too difficult for the Bush supporters to portray her as the disingenous exploiter she is. And that's saying something given the MSM's obvious collaboration her efforts.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 01:10 PM

Religous fundamentalism is the enemy, including the relativly milder forms we have in this country.

you sound like quite the fundamentalist yourself.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 01:16 PM

spaniard -- Sheehan appears to sound like more of a Kucinich-style peacenik than not. The problem is, her general message is RESONATING with anti-peacenik Americans -- only 34% of whom support GW's work as commander-in-chief -- based not on what she thinks or says but WHO SHE IS. Of course the President would love to cast the war debate as basically being an argument between a clean-cut "real American" and someone who has just done a bong hit. Unfortunately, this is turning into an argument between himself and "potheads" like Chuck Hagel, Rep. Walter Jones and George Will.

Posted by: markus at August 25, 2005 01:48 PM

The problem is, her general message is RESONATING with anti-peacenik Americans

Markus,

I'll admit Sheehan has gotten more support than she deserves, but she's still in the minority by about 10 points according to polls I've seen, and she fading fast even though the mainstream media has been carrying her water for her. Slowly but surely, however, the alternative media is splashing her own words all over the blogoshere and talk radio and exposing her for the political operative she is. The other day she referred to foreign jihadis in Iraq as "freedom fighters". My god, they killed her son, but her politics trump even a mother's love. That kind of talk just doesn't sell with regular folks, so she's easy to frame as the moonbat she is.

Posted by: spaniard at August 25, 2005 02:03 PM

"Of course not. Native Americans are citizens of this country. Palestinians are not citizens of Israel.

That's the difference."

You mean after we killed most of them and took nearly all their land we gave citizenship to the few that remain; or named shopping centers after the dead ones.

Perhaps Israel can take a leaf from our book: kill off most of the Paleos and let the few that remain become citizens.

Posted by: Seymour Paine at August 25, 2005 04:08 PM

If historic Palestine were returned to the Palestinians, the Jews could be repatriated to the Christian and Muslim countries they originally came from.

And the Palestinians originally came from the Arabian peninsula. Make them go back, too, and give Palestine back to its previous landlord - the UK.

The Jews are already where they originally came from, unless you want to go all the way back to Ur of the Chaldees - which happens to be in Iraq. The Jews are descended from (at least one) Mesopotamian who intermarried with local now-extinct tribes and who eventually built an indigenous government in Canaan. Jews have lived in modern-day Israel at least since the Persians allowed many of them to repatriate to their former kingdom.

Since the Babyloinain conquest, Palestine was always some distant nation's province. The "Palestinians" are simply descendents of one set of invaders, not the most recent ones, and were not even the most recent Muslim occupiers - that distiction goes to the Turks.

Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at August 25, 2005 10:05 PM

And the Palestinians originally came from the Arabian peninsula.

Genetic studies, I believe, show the 'palestinian arab' population to be pretty similar to the 'palestinian jew' population (i.e. the minority of jews who remained in the region under Ottoman rule). www.gnxp.com has more.

Presumably what happened is, as is usually the case, an arab ruling class moved in after the conquest, most converted to islam, a minority didn't.

In any case, this stuff has very little to do with what is to be done here and now, which should be governed by the actions and lives of currently living people, not abstract artificial constructs such as national myths and histories.

soru

Posted by: soru at August 26, 2005 03:46 AM

In the midst of all the bullshit about who lived where a million years ago and how this has any meaning on who should be forced out of their home at gunpoint while listening to the screams of murder, rape, and other joys of ethnic cleansing, I propose a thought experiment:

What if, improbably, it could be demonstrated that today's Palestinians, that is, the Arab population between the sea and the Jordan River, were the direct genetic descendents of the Philistines who are recorded as living there prior to the arrival of the Jews, who claim to have conquered the land?

Or, what if: what if it could be demonstrated that the Jews of Israel were not invaders, but in fact the aboriginal people of the land (archaeology tends to back this up)? And what if it could be demonstrated that, genetically, the Arabs living in the area were simply members of that same original tribe who later converted to Islam? In other words, what if there were no genetic difference at all - just the same people, whose ancestors lived there 2000 years ago as well?

Would this change anyone's calculus? Would anyone switch sides in their support?

I sincerely doubt it would, because I imagine that a lot of people who defend one side or the other do so because they identify with the plight of that people and have demonized the other side. Things like "we lived here first - 2000 years ago!" are convenient excuses. You have to build a portfolio of excuses for this sort of thing.

Honestly, people, who gives a fuck who lived where 2000 years ago, or 1000 years ago, or whenever? Jews live in Israel now. They should not be murdered to drive them from homes which they acquired peacefully. Most Jews in Israel had nothing to do with the violence of Israel's various conquests. Likewise, there are people living their now who identify themselves as Palestinians. I don't give a fuck whether their ancestors came from Arabia a hundred years ago or a million years ago. They're people, now, and they live there, now, and that's pretty much that, as far as I'm concerned.

Similarly, Europeans whiped out huge numbers of native peoples around the world - in America, in Australia, and so forth. A lot of the remaining indigenous people have gotten the shaft. This does not mean that the descendents of the Europeans should give up their homes to the descendents of the native peoples. I did nothing wrong to live in my tiny DC apartment. I think, as a society, we are living off the largess of what our ancestors stole from the ancestors of other people, and as such we share an obligation to help them move beyond the poverty they've pretty much been sentenced to for hundreds of years, but I'm a liberal, and I think we as a society have an obligation to help lots of people, so again, this has nothing to do with land.

Honestly, people, why would you care where people lived thousands of years ago? Here are some reasons not to care:

1) It was a long fucking time ago.
2) All those people are dead.
3) This means you cannot punish the bad deeds they committed.
4) People alive today shouldn't be blamed for the actions of dead people they never knew.
5) Even if the above weren't true, most of the past is unknowable.
5) a. That is, things like race and ethnicity are recent inventions. Peoples have moved, mixed, dissapeared, appeared, moved, stayed, moved, mixed, split, moved, mixed, and on and on and on so many times that it's almost impossible to know completely who your ancestors were, where they lived, and when they lived there.

It's like arguing over who "owns" England. Is it a man from York? No, says a man from London: my English ancestors were here before your Viking ancestors. No, says a man from Cornwall: my Celtic ancestors were here before your Anglo-Saxon ancestors. No, says a Welshman: my pre-Indoeuropean ancestors were here before all of you. And then they do a genetic test and find out, hey, there's a little bit of all four in all of them, plus a little Norman French, Roman, Dutch, and German ancestry in all of them. Maybe some African! A friend of mine is a "Black Norwegian" - that is, a Norwegian descended in part from African slaves brought back by Viking during the Middle Ages, and so she looks Italian, not Scandanavian.

In other words: who the fuck cares about the made-up ethnicity your ancestors created for you in the early 1800's as they pursued a political and philosophical agenda that has no basis in history or genetics?

Posted by: The Commenter at August 26, 2005 06:11 AM

soru,

Curious. Nobody brings up the topic of "artificial constructs" when the paleostinians are busy re-writing history-- only when the jews set the record straight. Re genetics, does that mean the palestinian Arab is genetically different from the Jordanian Arab? Let them test that.

Commenter,

I would submit to you that people's sympathy with the plight of either jews/paleostinians DOES have something to do with their story, and that if the zionists had instead landed in Madagascar instead of Israel, or that if palestinians could be shown to have recently immigrated because of the zionist economic boom, we wouldn't even be having this conversation. People's stories do count. We aren't just economic meat puppets as according to Marx, and now modern Liberals.

Posted by: spaniard at August 26, 2005 07:20 AM

Hey, if you want to think of yourself as a meat puppet, that's fine, but that's your business. Being a liberal means that I'm ok with your bizarre fetishes so long as they don't involve me and you don't interfere with my bizarre fetishes, none of which, fortunately, involve meat puppets.

But seriously folks, what I mean by that was this: frequently, we take a position for emotional reasons, and then try to build logical arguments and excuses around that to justify to and convince others.

People like the space program because, hey, space! It's cool. Also, we get some electronic gadgets or some new screws or something like that. Support billions for space because we get screws!

That sort of thing. I feel like the various defenses of the Israelis or the Palestinians are the sort of things that people collect, rather than building a coherent, logical argument for either.

I mean, seriously, you support a group's political claim to a particular territory because someone of that group has ancestors who lived in the territory 2000 years ago? Because there are a whole lot of people who maybe had some ancestors, or believe they are related somehow to other people who had ancestors, who lived somewhere else, and a lot of them had to leave their homes because of violence.

Zum Beispiel: There's a valley in eastern France that marks the furtherst western advance of Attilla the Hun's army. In the valley, there are still some people with characteristically Asian eyes, because they are descended from the east Asian Huns. Do they get kicked out by some people who claim they're descendents of the Visigoths who lived there before the Huns came? Or Romans, before the Visigoths? Or Gauls, before the Romans? Or...?

Posted by: The Commenter at August 26, 2005 07:40 AM

we take a position for emotional reasons, and then try to build logical arguments and excuses around that to justify to and convince others.

Commenter,

Your argument is built on sand. You're only begging the question when you state as fact that such reasons are only "emotional", and then you build your entire argument on this unproven assumption.

And even if true and you're right, all of that stands on the further assumption that "emotional" reasons aren't valid. Like a true marxist.

So tell me then in your opinion, what would be only valid reasons to support one side or the other?

Posted by: spaniard at August 26, 2005 10:59 AM

Ah, so, we take another dip into the Insaneopool.

Spaniard, I'm not a Marxist. I'm not quite sure where you got that notion.

I was simply describing my impression of how I've observed most people argue about most issues. There's always that grab-bag sense of trying to acquire as many arguments in defense or attack of something, regardless of how relevant they are to the original point or important they are to the arguer.

Sort of like: "I disagree with Michael Moore's political views. Plus, he's fat!"

Or: "Abortion is morally wrong. Also, it's risky!"

Or: "Israelis have a claim to live peacefully in their homes because they have done nothing to deserve being forced out by violence. Oh, and their ancestors lived here a long time ago."

I never argued that emotional reasons were invalid reasons. I simply don't see the whole "X lived here 2000 years ago, so that gives Y a reason to live there now" as being all that valid. Furthermore, I tend to see that as a kind of grab-bag argument: how many excuses can we find to justify something, regardless of how relevant or important any of them are?

Posted by: The Commenter at August 26, 2005 11:27 AM

Commenter,

ok, so I don't really believe you're a marxist. But you think like one even though you don't even know it.

First, my original point is that history, culture, values, religion are what matters most to people-- far more than what goodies and entitlements they can get from their government.

Second, regarding your "grab bag", I would agree that you're right in the general sense. But vis a vis the Arab/Israeli conflict those aren't just grab bag issues-- so you're wrong.

Posted by: spaniard at August 26, 2005 11:39 AM

Oooh, I have a good example.

The justification(s) for the war in Iraq!

I bet you guys can think of a few that I forgot, but these are some I remember:

1) WMD!
2) Saddam <3 terrorists.
3) Saddam had invaded his neighbors before.
4) Saddam was a tyrant.
5) Saddam gassed the Kurds.
6) Saddam tried to kill Papa Bush.
7) Freedom will make terrorists sad and there won't be any more terrorists. Or, democracy will drain the swamp that breeds terrorists.
8) Fightin' them over there, so we won't have to fight them over here*!
9) Saddam totally had those missiles that were a little in violation of UN Resolutions (I realize that, yes, this was bad and that this was legally, under international law, a casus belli - but who would have ever gone to war just over this?).
10) We can move our troops out of Saudi Arabia.
11) Iraq can pay for its own reconstruction.
12) We will be greeted with flowers and candy kisses.

And on and on and on. Now, whether you support(ed) or oppose(d) the war, I don't care. One must recognize that there are pretty good reasons to go to war (say, if Saddam actually had WMD and wanted to get them to the terrorists with whom he had an actual relationship) versus really bad ones (Iraq is way easier to beat than North Korea, so we'll get Iraq instead, and he tried to kill Papa Bush! and there were those missiles).

But it didn't matter how good or how bad the reasons were: what mattered was the size of the pile of justifications. Which is easier: convincing the American public of the merits of invading Iraq in order to bring democracy so as to spread American ideals through the region in order to weaken the popularity of and support for terrorism, OR saying: we need to invade because of A and B and C and D, and Saddam is bad because of E and F a G and H?

I have a feeling that the latter is much easier, since that's what people (like the Bush administration) do. Maybe they feel it and maybe it's a cynical ploy, but I think it has a lot to do with the sense that something is so overwhelmingly important, because of all these reasons! Maybe the reasons aren't that important individually, but can't you see the weight, the sheer mass, of all these reasons for doing or not doing something?

Which gets us back to the 2000 years question: there are good reasons and bad to support Israel. I think that the 2000 years one is pretty bad, but it adds to the pile, you know? It adds to the enormous weight of the pile of arguments, and it makes it overwhelmingly clear which side is right, because, I mean, didn't you hear all my reasons? Do you want me to list them all again?

So, I wonder: does everyone who associates with someone who might have had some ancestors who lived somewhere else in the past have a moral right to the place where those people might have lived?

  • "here" does not include London, Madrid, Beslan, or any other place in the world, anywhere.
Posted by: The Commenter at August 26, 2005 11:50 AM

That's funny, Spaniard. I never realized that I thought like a Marxist. Thanks for letting me know what's going on in my own head.

I wonder who else out there thinks things without know that. I mean, you might, for example, think like a monkey in the last stages of syphlitic madness, and not even know it! Huh. What a strange world we live in.

Posted by: The Commenter at August 26, 2005 11:52 AM

Since I started it, the final word:

Pat Robertson is every bit as anti-American as Michael Moore is. And, no, his anti-American comments are hardly isolated and taken out of context. We're not all going to agree on just what is American and what is not. The Founding Fathers didn't even agree on that one.

All I'm saying is, please respect the fact a vast majority of Americans believe that pluralism and religious freedom are American values. Pat Robertson does not. Any idiot who's listened to the guy for more than 5 seconds can figure that out. As such, we call him anti-American.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at August 26, 2005 02:41 PM

A harder problem I think is Jerusalem.

You think this is the harder problem? This will make the rest of the problem look simple in comparison.

Posted by: Dave Ruddell at August 27, 2005 03:17 PM

All I'm saying is, please respect the fact a vast majority of Americans believe that pluralism and religious freedom are American values. Pat Robertson does not.

Do you have a quote? any evidence at all?

You know what they say about opinions and assholes.

Posted by: spaniard at August 27, 2005 03:41 PM

Hi I have been given the task of getting links for our websites thathave good page rank on the links directories.In addition we have many categories so your site will be place on an appropriate page. If you would like to trade links please send me your website details.Best Regards,seopro@walla.com
http://www2w.bravehost.com vs the best casino http://casino.vmedical.us new online casino
casinos
casino
online poker
online gambling
online casinos
online casinos
online casinos
online poker
online casinos
online casino
casino
poker
casino
casino
casinos
online casino
online gambling
casino
poker
neteller casinos
online casino
online poker
online casino
internet poker
free online poker
texas holdem poker
poker
online slots
online roulette
online blackjack
poker
online casinos
online casino
online casino
online roulette
online poker
internet casinos
online slots
online blackjack

Posted by: online casinos at October 9, 2005 11:13 AM

Very nice site. panasonic jvc lg philips sony Telewizory Plazmowe promocje sklep.

Posted by: Telewizory Lcd at October 19, 2005 03:20 PM

online poker
online casino
online viagra sale
try viagra online
order viagra online
buy viagra online
order cialis online
free levitra online
cheap meridia online
buy xenical online
order propecia
order viagra online
online casino
online slots
phentermine
phentermine
levitra
tami flu
online poker
poker
poker
online poker
online poker
poker
poker

Posted by: online casino at October 23, 2005 10:54 AM

Adult Personals adult dating service sex dating adult
club erotic personals adult dating online
dating service join free.

adult personals Adult personals online
personals
adult dating
adult dating sex dating
adult
personals
adult personals sex dating
Internet Dating Service Internet Dating Service
dating
services
dating services - adult dating
service
adult dating
service
adult dating service adult
personals
adult photo personals adult photo personals
sex
dating
sex dating adult dating service
sex
dating
sex dating adult personals
personals
personals adult personals
adult sex
dating
adult sex dating adult personals
adult dating
online
adult dating online adult personals
online
personals
online personals adult personals
adult dating
service
adult dating service adult
personals
adult dating
personals
adult dating personals adult
personals
adult dating
adult dating service
adult dating
service
adult dating service
adult dating
online
adult dating online
single woman single woman
singles singles
singles match singles match
sexy singles sexy singles
singles dating singles dating
single dating single dating
dating service dating service
dating tips dating tips
adult personals adult personals
adult dating adult dating
adult personals adult personals
adult personal ads adult personal ads
adult dating adult dating
adult singles adult singles
adult picture personals adult picture personals
adult personal page adult personal page
adult personals pic adult personals pic
adult photo personals adult photo personals
xx xx
adult personal ads adult personals ads
adult singles adult singles
adult photo personals adult photo personals
adult personals pic adult personals pic
adult personal page adult personal page
adult picture personals adult picture personals
adult dating adult dating
personals ads personals ads
adult dating adult dating
adult personals adult personals
adult dating ads adult dating ads
adult singles adult singles
adult single dating adult single dating
adult personal adult personal
free adult dating free adult dating
adult dating online adult dating online
adult dating site adult dating site
adult swingers adult swingers
adult friend finder adult friend finder
xx xx
x x
singles adult singles adult
sexy singles sexy singles
singles personals singles personals
singles dating online singles dating online
adult singles dating adult singles dating
adult singles adult singles
singles site singles site
singles club singles club
singles dating service singles dating service
adult swingers adult swingers
adult personals adult personals
adult dating adult dating
singles on line singles on line
personals singles personals singles
sex personals sex personals
swingers swingers
swingers club swingers club
dating sex dating sex
personals sex personals sex
adult personals dating adult personals dating
online adult dating online adult dating
personals adult dating personals adult dating
sex dating sex dating
adult personals adult personals
personal ads personal ads
adult personal ads adult personal ads
free personals free personals
adult personals adult personals
sex dating sex dating
Autosurf For Cash autosurf for cash
Get Paid To Surf get paid to surf
satellite tv satellite tv
adult personals adult personals
sex site myspace.com sex site myspace.com
Discount Airfare discount airfare
Discount Hotels discount hotels
Discount Travel discount travel
Discount Cruises discount crusies
Discount Hotel Rooms discount hotel rooms
Discount Car Rentals discount car rentals
Discount Airline Tickets discount airline tickets
Discount Vacations discount vacations
Discount Airline Tickets discount airline tickets
Discount Air Travel discount air travel
Discounted Airfare discounted airfare
Airfare airfare
Levitra Generic Levitra
online pharmacy online pharmacy
Prozac Prozac
Cialis Generic cialis soft tabs
Cialis Generic cialis soft tabs
tadalafil tadalafil cialis
meridia generic meridia Sibutramine
Zenegra Zenegra
Celebrex Generic Celebrex Celecoxib
sildenafil sildenafil
sibutramine sibutramine Generic Meridia
celecoxib celecoxib Generic Celebrex online pharmacy
adult personals adult personals
home security home security
nanny cam nanny cam
nanny camera nanny camera
home security system home security system
home automation kits home automation kits
wireless camera systems wireless camera systems
universal remotes universal remotes
camera systems camera systems
home automation home automation
home security systems home security systems
credit card offer credit card offer

Adult Personals adult dating service sex dating adult
club erotic personals adult dating online
dating service adult singles join free.

Posted by: adult singles at November 4, 2005 01:12 PM

boston celtics news boston celtics news rumors
charlotte bobcats news charlotte bobcats news rumors
miami heat news miami heat news rumors
new jersey nets news new jersey nets news rumors
new york knicks news new york knicks news rumors
orlando magic news orlando magic news rumors
Philadelphia 76ers news philadelphia 76ers news rumors
washington wizards news washington wizards news rumors
atlanta hawks news atlanta hawks news rumors
new orleans hornets news new orleans hornets news rumors
chicago bulls news chicago bulls news rumors
cleveland cavaliers news cleveland cavaliers news rumors
detroit pistons news detroit pistons news rumors
indiana pacers news indiana pacers news rumors
milwaukee bucks news milwaukee bucks news rumors
toronto raptors news toronto raptors news rumors
dallas mavericks news dallas mavericks news rumors
denver nuggets news denver nuggets news rumors
houston rockets news houston rockets news rumors
memphis grizzlies news memphis grizzlies news rumors
minnesota timberwolves news minnesota timberwolves news rumors
san antonio spurs news san antonio spurs news rumors
utah jazz news utah jazz news rumors
golden state warriors news golden state warriors news rumors
los angeles clippers newslos angeles clippers news rumors
los angeles lakers news los angeles lakers news rumors
phoenix suns news phoenix suns news rumors
portland trailblazers news portland trailblazers news rumors
sacramento kings news sacramento kings news rumors
seattle supersonics news seattle supersonics news rumors
tickets tickets
sports tickets sports tickets lakers tickets
concert tickets concert tickets
eagles concert tickets eagles concert tickets
theater tickets theater tickets
tickets tickets
nfl tickets nfl tickets
2006 super bowl tickets 2006 super bowl tickets
baseball tickets baseball tickets
hockey tickets hockey tickets
nba tickets nba tickets lakers tickets
lakers tickets los angeles lakers tickets
clippers tickets los angeles clippers tickets
boxing tickets boxing tickets
nascar tickets nascar tickets
tennis tickets tennis tickets us open
final four tickets final four tickets college basketball tickets
college football tickets college football tickets
rodeo tickets rodeo tickets pbr tickets
pbr tickets pbr tickets nfr
national finals rodeo tickets national finals rodeo tickets
2006 world cup tickets 2006 world cup tickets
soccer tickets soccer tickets world cup
wwe tickets wwe tickets raw smackdown
raw tickets wwe raw tickets
smackdown tickets wwe smackdown tickets
lakers tickets la lakers tickets
cheap lakers tickets cheap los angeles lakers tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
lakers tickets la lakers tickets
cheap lakers tickets cheap lakers tickets
lakers season tickets lakers season tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
los angeles lakers tickets los angeles lakers tickets
2006 rose bowl tickets 2006 rose bowl tickets
pasadena rose bowl tickets pasadena rose bowl tickets
rose bowl tickets pasadena rose bowl tickets
bowl games bowl games cheap super bowl tickets
cheap super bowl tickets cheap super bowl tickets
cheap super bowl tickets cheap super bowl tickets
nfl football tickets nfl football tickets
nfl super bowl tickets nfl super bowl tickets
ducks tickets mighty ducks tickets tickets
world series tickets world series tickets
2005 world series tickets 2005 world series tickets bowl tickets
baseball world series baseball world series
world series world series
miami vice dvd miami vice dvd
miami vice miami vice
la live la live
sporting event tickets sporting event tickets
music events music events
sporting event tickets sporting event tickets
all events all events
sports events sports events sporting event tickets sporting event tickets lakers tickets
music events concert tickets
cheap concert tickets cheap concert tickets
concert tickets online concert tickets online
broadway tickets broadway tickets
broadway show broadway show
broadway musical broadway musical
nfl tickets nfl tickets
nfl football tickets nfl football tickets
cheap nfl tickets cheap nfl tickets
baseball tickets baseball tickets
mlb tickets mlb tickets
nba tickets nba tickets
basketball tickets basketball tickets
nhl hockey tickets nhl hockey tickets
nhl tickets nhl tickets
hockey tickets hockey tickets
serenity dvd serenity dvd
the 40 year old virgin dvd the 40 year old virgin dvd
the skeleton key dvd the skeleton key dvd
law and order dvd law and order dvd
serenity serenity
serenity dvd serenity dvd
the 40 year old virgin the 40 year old virgin
the 40 year old virgin dvd the 40 year old virgin dvd
the skeleton key the skeleton key
law and order dvd law and order
white sox world series tickets white sox world series tickets
chicago white sox world series tickets chicago white sox world series tickets
white sox tickets chicago white sox tickets
world series tickets world series tickets
baseball world series tickets baseball world series tickets
tarps tarps
discount tarps discount tarps
covers covers
discount covers covers
hollywood club hollywood club
club club
music site myspace.com music site myspace.com
700 sundays tickets 700 sundays tickets
wilshire theatre wilshire theatre
wilshire theatre tickets wilshire theatre tickets
700 sundays 700 sundays
Buy cheap concert tickets for audioslave, 2005 rolling stones concert tickets as well as the eagles concert tickets plus kanye west in concert and keith urban buy depeche mode tickets you can even buy paul mccartney concert tickets gwen stefani of no doubt concert tickets don't miss 311 in concert if you have children the wiggles concert tickets would be a great choice plus get all concert tour schedule for 2005 music events.
concerts concerts
concert schedule concert schedule
concert dates concert dates
concert tickets concert tickets
cheap concert tickets cheap concert tickets
concert tour concert tour
kanye west concert tickets kanye west concert tickets
rolling stones tour rolling stones tour
rolling stones tickets rolling stones tickets
eagles concert eagles concert
the eagles the eagles
audioslave tickets audioslave tickets
depeche mode tickets depeche mode tickets
gwen stefani tickets gwen stefani tickets
paul mccartney tickets paul mccartney tickets
paul mccartney tour paul mccartney tour
paul mccartney concert paul mccartney concert
paul mccartney 2005 tour paul mccartney 2005 tour
paul mccartney 2005 us tour paul mccartney 2005 us tour
bon jovi tickets bon jovi tickets
bon jovi concert bon jovi concert
bon jovi tour bon jovi tour
bon jovi tour dates bon jovi tour dates
bon jovi concert dates bon jovi concert dates
bon jovi concert schedule bon jovi concert schedule
rolling stones concert tickets rolling stones concert tickets
eagles concert tickets eagles concert tickets
eagles farewell tour eagles farewell tour
eagles tour eagles tour
eagles concert tour eagles concert tour
audioslave concert tickets audioslave concert tickets
audioslave tickets audioslave tickets
audioslave concert audioslave concert
depeche mode concert tickets depeche concert tickets
depeche mode tickets depeche tickets
gwen stefani concert tickets gwen stefani concert tickets
gwen stefani tickets gwen stefani tickets
gwen stefani concert gwen stefani concert
gwen stefani tour gwen stefani tour
gwen stefani tour dates gwen stefani tour dates
paul mccartney concert tickets paul mccartney concert tickets
paul mccartney tickets paul mccartney tickets
paul mccartney tour paul mccartney tour
paul mccartney concert paul mccartney concert
paul mccartney 2005 tour paul mccartney 2005 tour
paul mccartney 2005 us tour paul mccartney 2005 us tour
paul mccartney us tour paul mccartney us tour
bon jovi concert tickets bon jovi concert tickets
stones tickets stones tickets
rolling stones concert rolling stones concert
rolling stones tour 2005 rolling stones tour 2005
rolling stones tour rolling stones tour
2005 rolling stones tour 2005 rolling stones tour
rolling stones tour dates rolling stones tour dates
rolling stones concert tour rolling stones concert tour
rolling stones concert schedule rolling stones concert schedule
2005 rolling stones 2005 rolling stones
the wiggles tickets the wiggles tickets
the wiggles concert tickets the wiggles concert tickets
concert ticket wiggles concert ticket wiggles
wiggles tickets wiggles tickets
the wiggles concert ticket the wiggles concert ticket
wiggles concert wiggles concert
the wiggles tickets the wiggles tickets
the wiggles tour the wiggles tour
wiggles concert tickets wiggles concert tickets
wiggles in concert wiggles in concert
keith urban tickets keith urban tickets
keith urban concert tour keith urban concert tour
concert keith urban concert keith urban
keith urban concerts keith urban concerts
keith urban in concert keith urban in concert
keith urban tour dates keith urban tour dates
keith urban concert keith urban concert
keith urban concert tickets keith urban concert tickets
kanye west concert tickets kanye west concert tickets
kanye west concert kanye west concert
kanye west tour kanye west tour
kanye west concert ticket kanye west concert ticket
kanye west tour date kanye west tour date
kanye west in concert kanye west in concert
311 tickets 311 tickets
311 concert tickets 311 concert tickets
311 tour dates 311 tour dates
311 in concert 311 in concert
311 concert 311 concert
311 concert tour 311 concert tour
final four tickets final four tickets
cheap sports tickets cheap sports tickets
theatre directory theatre directory
football directory football directory
nba basketball tickets nba basketball tickets
ncaa tournament ncaa tournament
broncos football directory broncos football directory
nba basketball nba basketball
buy theatre tickets buy theatre tickets
kicking and screaming dvd kicking and screaming dvd
munsters dvd munsters dvd
unleashed dvd unleashed dvd
land of the dead dvd land of the dead dvd
high school reunion collection high school reunion collection
cinderella man dvd cinderella man dvd
tickets links tickets links
battlestar galactica dvd battlestar galactica dvd
broken flowers dvd broken flowers dvd
american gothic dvd american gothic dvd
sports tickets for less sports tickets for less
nfl football tickets nfl football tickets
sports links sports links
tickets directory tickets directory

Posted by: concert tickets at November 4, 2005 01:35 PM

Resources for major league baseball tickets buy baseball tickets
Major League Baseball Tickets where mlb baseball tickets are bought
Baseball Tickets U2 tickets cheap concert tickets has scored another box office bonanza, grossing $48.4 million on tour during the first half of 2005.
Concert Ticketsinfo to purchase cheap concert tickets
Cheap Concert Tickets info to purchase cheap concert tickets
Concert Schedule You can buy nba basketball tickets
Basketball Tickets for all basketball games with nba finals tickets
NBA Finals Tickets where to buy nba tickets Basketball TicketsNFL Football tickets NFL Football , American, distinct type of nfl football tickets
NFL Tickets that developed in the United States in the 19th century now get your super bowl tickets.
NFL Tickets As NHL Hockey tickets spread across the continent with the national hockey league
National Hockey League , there was a marked increase in the number of organized NHL hockey tickets
Hockey Tickets leagues. Hockey Tickets wwe tickets world wrestling federation or as it is know the wwe buy wwe tickets for all wrestling tickets events with wwe smackdown tickets
WWE Tickets also wwe wrestling tickets. WWE Tickets rodeo tickets rodeo tickets are becoming even more popular these days the pro bull riders or known as the pbr tickets and the national finals rodeo tickets also known as nfr tickets
Rodeo Tickets are flying through the roof. Rodeo Tickets soccer tickets or what they call in european countries football tickets in the US as us soccer tickets go World Cup Soccer Tickets buy world cup soccer tickets.
Soccer Tickets Part of the Los Angeles Center Theatre tickets Group with los angeles theater tickets, along with the Mark Taper Forum, the Ahmanson Theatre tickets or as you would say ahmanson theater tickets don't forget to get the hard to get wicked tickets.
Theater Tickets buy los angeles tickets like los angeles dodgers tickets Dodgers Tickets or buy los angeles lakers tickets
Los Angeles Lakers Tickets or relax and buy los angeles theater tickets
Los Angeles Theater don't for get those los angeles clippers tickets have a good time los angeles concert tickets. Los Angeles Theater well you won't lose out if you go to live horse racing tickets there is plenty of enjoyment at the fairgrounds at thoroughbred horse racing.
Thoroughbred Horse Racing buy boxing Schedule with boxing schedule Boxing Tickets. autoracing or the term for today really would have to be nascar tickets with nascar schedule along with nascar racing
Nascar Racing people these days are scrambling to buy nascar tickets for all the nascar races.
Nascar Tickets buy sports tickets Sports Tickets for all events what sports tickets are you going to buy?
rose bowl tickets rose bowl tickets singles singles
the big lebowski the big lebowski dvd
Lakers Tickets buy sports tickets
Sports Tickets for all events like lakers tickets what sports tickets are you going to buy?
sex dating sex dating.
best affiliate program best affiliate program free affiliate program free affiliate program
dodgers tickets dodgers tickets big lebowski dvd big lebowski dvd the big lebowski big lebowski dvd
Los Angeles Lakers Tickets buy los angeles lakers tickets at staples center for all events like los angeles lakers tickets what los angeles tickets are you going to buy for sports tickets?
Blues Brothers blues brothers dvd movie
rumble fish dvd rumble fish dvd
carlito's way rise to power carlito's way rise to power carlitos way rise to power carlitos way rise to power
angels tickets angels tickets sports tickets sports tickets
Los Angeles Concert Tickets buy los angeles tickets for all los angeles concert tickets Los Angeles events like los angeles dodgers also los angeles angels tickets events like los angeles clippers tickets what los angeles tickets are you going to buy for los angeles concert tickets? Affiliate Program ticket affiliate program
lakers tickets lakers tickets sports tickets sports tickets singles dating singles dating
lakers news lakers news
dodgers tickets los angeles dodgers tickets
lakers tickets los angeles lakers tickets
super bowl tickets super bowl tickets
lakers tickets los angeles lakers tickets tickets tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
sports events sports events
sporting event tickets sports event tickets
event tickets event tickets
all events all events
sporting events sporting events
theater tickets theater tickets
music events music events
all events all events
other events other events
concert events concert events
lakers rumors lakers rumors news
music events music events
all events all events
nfl tickets nfl tickets
broadway tickets broadway tickets
concert tickets concert tickets
sporting event tickets sporting event tickets
nba tickets nba tickets
mlb tickets mlb tickets
sports events sports events
sporting events sporting events
other events other events
music events music events
event tickets event tickets
sporting event tickets sporting event tickets
sporting events sporting events
seaquest dsv dvd seaquest dsv dvd
seaquest dsv seaquest dsv
leave it to beaver dvd leave it to beaver dvd
hollywood club hollywood club
sports site myspace.com sports site myspace.com
music site myspace.com music site myspace.com
leave it to beaver leave it to beaver
2006 super bowl 2006 Super Bowl
rose bowl rose Bowl
lalive lalive
wrestlemania tickets wrestlemania tickets
lakers tickets la lakers tickets
lakers tickets cheap los angeles lakers tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
lakers tickets la lakers tickets
lakers tickets cheap lakers tickets
lakers tickets lakers season tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
lakers tickets los angeles lakers tickets
buy theatre tickets buy theatre tickets
los angeles theater los angeles theater
nfl directory nfl directory
nfl sunday tickets nfl sunday tickets
lakers tickets lakers tickets
nba basketball tickets nba basketball tickets
nba directory nba directory
cry baby dvd cry baby dvd
breakfast club dvd breakfast club dvd
mall rats dvd mall rats dvd
house dvd house dvd

Posted by: cheap concert tickets at November 4, 2005 01:45 PM

adult personals - adult personals and adult singles top choice

free adult personals - free adult personals, adult singles and adult chat rooms

adult dating - adult dating for adult personals and adult singles

free adult dating - free adult dating with free adult web cam and free adult chat - adult dating free

adult swingers - adult swingers and adult personals use this free adult web cam and adult chat

free adult swingers - free adult swingers, free adult personals - adult sex dating

adult chat - adult chat and free adult dating for adult personals

free adult chat - free adult chat and free adult web cam

adult friend - adult friend and adult personals free adult dating

adult web cam - adult web cam and free adult chat for sex personals

adult finder - adult finder for adult personals

free adult web cam - free adult web cam and free adult chat

adult dating service - free adult dating service with free adult chat

sex dating - sex dating for adult personals and erotic adult personals

adult sex dating - adult sex dating for adult personals and adult singles

adult singles - adult singles for adult sex dating

sex adult dating - sex adult dating, adult singles site

adult dating service - adult dating service, sex adult dating

adult models directory - top adult models free directory

adult friend finder - find adult friend for free

adult finder - adults find friends for free!

adult chat - best adult chat available here

best porn stars - best and most famous porn stars

adult dating - top adult dating site

adult dating chat - adult dating chat - any adult welcome!

adult sex dating - adult sex dating portal

free adult dating - free adult dating available here

adult dating online - adult dating online best choice

adult dating personals - find adult dating personals here

adult dating site - best adult dating site

adult xxx dating - adult xxx dating available here

adult singles dating - adult singles dating top site

porn star gallery - most famous porn stars free gallerys

porn star gals - best porn star free gals

famous porn stars - most famous porn stars free photos

porn stars - porn stars and adult models free photos

free porn stars - free porn stars listings and galleries

top porn stars - top porn stars free listings

online dating service - free online dating service

dating services - free dating services, online personals

single dating - singles dating online

internet dating - best internet dating site!

christian dating - christians dating services free

christian dating service - dating service for christians

christian dating services - dating services for christians

free online dating - free online dating services

online dating Louisville - Louisville online dating

hispanic dating service - hispanic dating services

dating lexington online - dating lexington online singles and personals
Discount Pharmacy discount pharmacy best choice

Online Pharmacy cheap online pharmacy store,

Discount Online Pharmacy at best prices.

Sildenafil Citrate Sildenafil Citrate pills

Tadalafil - Tadalafil pills and Generic Cialis - Generic Cialis pills

Vardenafil HCI (Generic Levitra)

6-Tablet Trial Pack

Carisoprodol (Generic Soma)

Finasteride (Generic Propecia)

Atorvastatin (Generic Lipitor)

Sibutramine (Generic Meridia)

Celecoxib (Celebrex)

Metformin (Glucophage)

Amlodipine (Norvasc)

Simvastatin (Zocor)

Tretinoin (Generic Retin-A)

Atomoxetine (Generic Strattera)

Bupropion SR (Generic Wellbutrin)

Eszopiclone (Generic Lunesta)

Fexofenadine (Alegra D)

Loratidine (Claritin)

Ranitidine (Zantac)

Regalis (Cialis)

Sertraline (Zoloft)

Free games free games

free ringtones free ringtones

free online games free online games

free screensaver free screensaver

free credit report free credit report

free clip art free clip art

free downloads free downloads

free stuff free stuff

free wallpapers free wallpapers

free email free email

free people search free people search

free translation free translation

free chat rooms free chat rooms

free chat free chat

free software downloads free software downloads

free sample and free samples

free desktop wallpaper free desktop wallpapers

Posted by: adult personals at December 28, 2005 02:31 AM
To qualify for a credit card you must be at least 18 years old and have a regular
source of income. Despite invitations from credit
card issuers
, you will still have to demonstrate that you are a good risk
before they grant you credit.
The proof is in your credit report. Before you submit a credit
card application
, you may want to obtain a copy of your credit
report
to make sure it is accurate. Credit
cards by type
could be following:

0% Intro & Low APR credit cards
- 0% Intro & Low APR credit cards
,

Rewards credit cards
- Rewards credit cards ,

Instant Approval credit cards
- Instant Approval credit cards,

Airline Miles Cards
- Airline Miles Cards,

Business Credit Cards
- Business Credit Cards,

Gas Credit Cards
- Gas Credit Cards,

Student Credit Cards
- Student Credit Cards ,

Low Interest Credit Cards
- Low Interest Credit Cards, ,

American Express credit cards
,

Bank Of America credit cards
- Bank Of America credit cards,

Chase credit cards
- Chase Manhattan credit cards,

CitiBank credit cards
- Citibank credit cards

Columbus Bank credit cards
- Columbus Bank credit cards,

Discover credit cards
- discover credit cards

HSBC Bank credit cards
,

New Millennium Bank credit cards
- Millennium Bank credit cards, and

U.S. Bank credit cards

Calculator
Mortgage
- calculator free mortgage, calculator mortgage rate

Mortgage
Calculator
calculator interest mortgage, mortgage interest calculator, calculator
mortgage
.

Read more about personal
finance
, earnings,
stock
markets
and economy
at online