November 20, 2004

Zeyad's Frightening Report

Posted by Jeremy Brown

Zeyad, the Iraqi dentist who blogs from Baghdad at Healing Iraq, reports that fighting has moved into Baghdad. Zeyad finds himself at the heart of a very frightening situation and he blogs a first hand report that will make the hair on the back of your neck stand up:

Fierce fighting has been going on in several areas of Baghdad for the last 4 hours. I was supposed to leave for Basrah this morning, as soon as I walked out of the front door I was face to face with ten or so hooded men dressed in black carrying Ak-47's and RPG's. They had set up a checkpoint right in front of our door.

[...]

We watched them from behind the door with my mother frantically trying to get us inside. There was an exchange of fire and someone was bellowing "Where are the National traitors? (referring to the National Guards) Let them come and taste this." More shooting followed.

First, I think I can speak for all readers of this blog in saying I hope Zeyad and his family stay safe during this turmoil.

My next reaction, now that the wave of sympathetic fear has made its journey through my gut, is to zero in on the single phrase, among so many jarring phrases, that I am convinced characterizes what is going on now: 'hooded men'.

Here in the U.S. even White northerners like myself don't need to be reminded to be put off by the image of hooded militia running through residential neighborhoods looking for people to slaughter and terrorize.

Here is a look back at the 'race riot' in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1921:

This happened in the racially and politically tense atmosphere of northeastern Oklahoma. The area was a hotbed of Ku Klux Klan activity at that time. By June 1, white mobs had invaded the segregated black part of town and destroyed the Greenwood district, known nationally as the "Black Wall Street" for its economic success. Hundreds of people were killed; dozens of businesses, 1,256 homes, many churches and a hospital were destroyed, in an area covering 35 blocks. Estimates of the dead range up to 300. After the governor declared martial law, black people were rounded up by the National Guard and put into the baseball stadium. Several black families, such as Ada Lois Sipuel Fisher's, fled for more peaceful cities.

Contrast the target of U.S. military operations then with the targets now. Again, Zeyad:

A jet fighter was now screeching over our heads and it let off some flares apparently in an attempt to scare away the 'Mujahideen'. They left their positions for a while and slowly people started to come out. Parents nervously dragging schoolchildren behind them and youngsters who were undecided whether to move on or return home.

And Strategy Page offers some important context on what is now going on in Iraq (via Instapundit):

American troops now control all of Fallujah and have found extensive evidence of terrorist and criminal gangs using the city as a headquarters. Evidence was found of torture chambers, and video sets used for filming the execution of kidnap victims. Moreover, the body of a woman, thought to be foreign aid executive (Care International) Margaret Hassan, was also found in Fallujah. A video of her murder was recently released by her killers, and it appears that the killing was done in Fallujah. Without Fallujah as a “safe area” for keeping hostages, killing them, and getting away with it, the terrorists have to do their dirty work in cities where there is a strong police presence, and nearby American troops. That’s what’s happening in Baghdad, Mosul and other cities right now. The gangs are trying to control neighborhoods in these cities, and are not succeeding.

There's no denying that the current flareup in the fighting is disturbing to read about and is a horror for the people involved in it. But I don't see how anyone can deny that this is a struggle for the advancement of Iraq's future as a free, potentially democratic state. This is a struggle that we have every reason to hope will succeed and, I think, much justification for being cautiously optimistic about.

Posted by Jeremy Brown at November 20, 2004 09:20 AM
Comments

I believe that Zeyad is a Sunni although of the secular variety.I hope he and his family stay safe.
This is going to get ugly(well let's be honest,a trifle more ugly,as it's already grotesque).I believe that a considerable portion of the Sunnis have decided to 'roll the dice',in an attempt to re-animate the corpse of Sunni domination.Whether this decision is the result of Baathist intimidation or just the usual disastrously flawed 'ME'sense of history,the results are the same.
It is now just a question of how many Sunnis have to die before the cause is abandoned.The Sunnis appear to have rejected their fellow Iraqis except as subordinates,and are going to go down snarling.
Frankly,I am not surprised and it really makes things easier,in a way.The gloves can come off and the enemy can be dealt with more 'collectively'and less individually.Sort of a mini civil war with only the Sunnis being on one of the sides.I wish things had been different but I strongly believe that no amount of fore-planning would have served to convince the 'insurgents'to voluntarily give up their status in Iraq.What impresses me is the remarkable sophistication of the largely 'backward'Shia areas and their willingness to VOTE for the changes they see as needed.I hope they will remain 'tolerant'and 'clever',but it's not a certainty.All things considered though,if both we and our opponents are forced to 'roll'the dice and see what comes up,I really like our chances as opposed to theirs.In this game,we are the house.

Posted by: dougf at November 20, 2004 11:41 AM

If it bleeds, we can kill it.

Let them come.

Posted by: David at November 20, 2004 03:28 PM

My prayers go out to Zeyad and all our boys fighting the good fight.

Posted by: political at November 20, 2004 04:51 PM

"What impresses me is the remarkable sophistication of the largely 'backward'Shia areas and their willingness to VOTE for the changes they see as needed."

I'm with you on that. I remember Hitchens predicting that Iraqi Shia, having seen what horrors Iran was capable of unleashing on them and on their own people, would have zero interest in setting up a theocracy for themselves. I was worried it was wishful thinking on Hitchens' part, but I know by now that he doesn't say things like that unless he's done his homework.

Posted by: Jeremy Brown at November 20, 2004 07:52 PM

Jeremy:

Civil wars often bring out the worst in people.

Both sides will undoubtedly take many innocent lives in exchange for the temporary "upper hand" or for P.R. reasons.

Can't we be in the middle? Why take sides? On one hand, you have a virtual puppet government without support of the majority, and on the other hand we have random gangs of hooligans armed with AK-47s and bombs strapped to their chests. I don't think I'd feel comfortable having either side to protect me.

Regarding your reference to the KKK, they were "White Supremacists". The Iraqi insurgents would consider themselves a national liberation movement, so they must be compared to other such movements, not American terrorists wearing white linen. In other words, compare them with the American revolutionaries, or even the Viet Cong, but don't lump them in with the Klansmen.

Peace,
JB.

Posted by: Jeremy Brendan at November 20, 2004 09:42 PM

" On one hand, you have a virtual puppet government without support of the majority, and on the other hand we have random gangs of hooligans armed with AK-47s and bombs strapped to their chests"

I see. A government committed to setting up elections is a "puppet government" that isn't worth supporting? Only if you're an enemy of democracy, freedom and all those out of fashion liberal idea... Like everyone in the middle east who started this bullshit habit of calling Alawi "a puppet"

Nice of you to add the word "virtual", though asshole.

Posted by: Joshua Scholar at November 20, 2004 11:21 PM

"Regarding your reference to the KKK, they were 'White Supremacists'. The Iraqi insurgents would consider themselves a national liberation movement, so they must be compared to other such movements, not American terrorists wearing white linen. In other words, compare them with the American revolutionaries, or even the Viet Cong, but don't lump them in with the Klansmen."

The KKK weren't just "white supremecists," they were religious supremecists as well. You can call the Sunni a national liberation movement, but liberation from what? Iraqi occupation? They are Iraqis. They simply believe that their religious and moral views trump that of the rest of the Iraqi population, and they feel like they have to do something about it because, well, they're right in their own minds. Hmm, sounds like the KKK to me. I don't think the American revolutionaries would have killed a woman for not clothing from head to toe, or killed an Englishman simply because he was English - they were all mostly of English descent in the first place. But I would propose to you that a Sunni terrorist would kill a white man on the spot simply because he wasn't an Arab. Someone should write a book on the parrallels between the KKK and the multi-arab-national terrorist force in Iraq. I wouldn't be surprised if, like the KKK, some of those people within the police force are also in terrorist circles.

Posted by: Garret Bolthouse at November 21, 2004 12:27 AM

"Regarding your reference to the KKK, they were "White Supremacists". The Iraqi insurgents would consider themselves a national liberation movement, so they must be compared to other such movements, not American terrorists wearing white linen."

Thank God that John Kerry lost the election. Too many of his supporters agree with the above sentiments. Such people need to be marginalized.

Posted by: David Thomson at November 21, 2004 03:15 AM

"Can't we be in the middle? Why take sides?
...
Peace,"
JB.
---- JB

Well isn't this special?It is not often that one gets to see the effete pseudo-leftist arguments for do-nothingism laid out so cogently and all in one place as well.
May I paraphrase just in case the message might still be vague:
A.Everything is everything ( and consequently,nothing is really anything,and why disturb our harmony?)It's not as if we or non-violent Iraqis are the 'good-guys'here or anything.My goodness,what a quaint notion.
B.All we are saying is "Give Peace a Chance",and "Can't we all just get along?".
C.Please stop bothering me.Conflict is s-o-o-o-o distasteful,is it not?Hey guys, let's sit in the stands and watch the lesser breeds run amok.So diverting in a crude way,don't you think?I mean it's not as if what they do matters to us and our perfect lives.Really what can they do to us as they tumble down the lunacy slope?
9-11?
Oh that is so Last Week .

Posted by: dougf at November 21, 2004 03:49 AM

Garret Bolthouse "The Iraqi insurgents would consider themselves a national liberation movement, so they must be compared to other such movements...In other words, compare them with the American revolutionaries"

Yeah, the minute men were known for blowing up markets, killing all professionals and intellectuals hoping to drive them out of the country, using women and children as human shields, kidnapping for ransom and destroying the country's infastructure. That group that warned parents that they were going to destroy the local school in Bagdad the other brought Ben Franklin to mind immediately.

Posted by: Joshua Scholar at November 21, 2004 07:18 AM

Garrett,

remnants of the Nazi SS also tried to "liberate" their country from our GIs after WWII. SS officers — called 'werewolves'— engaged in sabotage and attacked both coalition forces and those locals cooperating with them—much like today's Baathist and Fedayeen remnants. They and other Nazi regime remnants targeted Allied soldiers, and they targeted Germans who cooperated with the Allied forces. Mayors were assassinated including the American-appointed mayor of Aachen, the first major German city to be liberated. Children as young as 10 were used as snipers, radio broadcasts, and leaflets warned Germans not to collaborate with the Allies. They plotted sabotage of factories, power plants, rail lines. They blew up police stations and government buildings, and they destroyed stocks of art and antiques that were stored by the Berlin Museum. Does this sound familiar?

So I don't care what they consider themselves. We will crush them like the vile cockroaches they are.

Your moral equivalency has reduced you to apologizing for fascism. You should be ASHAMED of yourself and your bankrupt ideology.

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 08:34 AM

Garret's rebuttal to Jeremy Brendan saves me a lot of typing. What he said. Plus, if we don't judge Klansmen on the basis of how they characterize themselves then why would we think to honor the self descriptions of hooded iraqi 'milita.' In the Tulsa, OK 'riot' (conflagration, siege...not sure what to call it) the KKK seemed to have thought they were taking a stand against what they would have seen as Black people offending God's will by gaining affluence and influence for the first time in America, thus something (the Klan would have argued) finally had to be done. I choose not to accept their framework for what, by any objective standard, was simply racist terrorism aimed at stripping a certain class of citizens of their rights and freedoms. The Klan might have thought of themselves as liberators also, just like the founding fathers. But that sort of interpretation represents their pathology, not historical fact.

Posted by: Jeremy Brown at November 21, 2004 08:38 AM

"Can't we be in the middle?"

"...In other words, compare them with the American revolutionaries."

Folks, the bad guys in Iraq are not the US Marines. I'm trying to be polite as I type this and I'm finding it very difficult. There are too many dimensions along which your statements are reprehensible; the opportunities for righteous rage too tempting. Where's DennisThePeasant when we need him?

I take comfort that these "random gangs of hooligans" (they weren't random a few days ago; then they were the city government of Falluja) are going around hooded. That's a sign that some part of them knows to be ashamed of what they're doing, and/or knows in the end their cause is doomed to failure.

Posted by: Mark Poling at November 21, 2004 08:40 AM

Garrett:

Here's a link on post-WWII Nazi "freedom fighters". Educate yourself, and stop nuancing yourself towards complete irrelevancy.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1373/is_10_50/ai_66157021

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 08:42 AM

FRIENDLY-FIRE ALERT !!

Uh David,uh,I think that Garrett is getting a bad rap here.He is exactly with you in despising the thoughts in JB's post.In fact,it is JB with whom we all have issues.
We need all the allies we have as the MSM continues to try to defeat GWB even though he was just re-elected!!!.

Posted by: dougf at November 21, 2004 09:26 AM

Sorry bout that Garrett. Replace your name in my posts with JB's.

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 09:29 AM

There is much comedy of errors potential here. I had to remind myself that "JB" is the other Jeremy, not me. It's all very funny, really.

Posted by: Jeremy Brown at November 21, 2004 10:57 AM

"There is much comedy of errors potential here. I had to remind myself that "JB" is the other Jeremy, not me. It's all very funny, really."--JB#1

And it is ALL David's fault.Not that I am pointing fingers in a childish,judgemental way,of course.Like the MSM,I am just recording reality with perfect impartiality, or recording the select portion of it I have chosen to highlight.Funny how it that perspective always seems to reflect well on me. Just lucky I guess.

Posted by: dougf at November 21, 2004 11:53 AM

dougf,

I will gladly take the fall, cause it's not about me and I'm a team player, as long as we can keep decimating those silly Libs.

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 12:12 PM

David Thomson: "Thank God that John Kerry lost the election. Too many of his supporters agree with the above sentiments. Such people need to be marginalized."

I agree wholeheartedly with the marginalization of such individuals. It’s long overdue. I pray that it’s not too late.

Posted by: Kay Hoog at November 21, 2004 01:54 PM

David, do you even know the date of the Nazi surrender at Reims? After that there were no significant destabilizing activities by Nazi remnants, zero US combat casualties and comparing the situation to present-day Iraq is just plain ridiculous. So go eductate yourself.

Posted by: novakant at November 21, 2004 02:12 PM

Novakant,

no, I suggest YOU educate yourself. I already provided you a starting point in one of my posts above.

here it is again:

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1373/is_10_50/ai_66157021

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 02:21 PM

Not so, novakant. Brush up a bit on the post-war insurrection movement in Germany, won't you?

Posted by: nuvokant at November 21, 2004 02:21 PM

LOL I was a little bit worried for a second there, but no biggie, just to let you all know, I quoted JB first, and then I commented. I am in no way a supporter of these terrorists and their cause.

Posted by: Garret Bolthouse at November 21, 2004 04:27 PM

See, I know you would love to compare the GW2 to WW2 because after all WW2 was the good war, but historically the comparison between post-war Germany and Iraq makes no sense at all - get your facts straight, here's a little help:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2087768

Posted by: novakant at November 21, 2004 04:44 PM

And I'm sure GW2 is Vietnam in your mind, novakant, because everything is Vietnam to the Left. That's so '60's. In the 1960's, the Left went off the rails, and they have yet to return. I doubt they ever will get over it until those who went through it depart from this mortal coil, so we appear to be doomed to have to hear about how wonderful the 1960's were for at least the next 20-30 years. I'm not sure I can stand it. . . .

Posted by: Ben at November 21, 2004 05:13 PM

"In the 1960's, the Left went off the rails..."

Nope, in the 1930s the Left went to the Other Side, the side that murdered 100 million people in the name of socialism, and they have been on that side ever since as dupes or even agents...

Posted by: Winger at November 21, 2004 05:32 PM

And I'm sure GW2 is Vietnam in your mind, novakant, because everything is Vietnam to the Left.

Well, I can only speak for myself and say that I find such historical comparisons generally rather unhelpful and unscientific, as every parallel is outnumbered by slew of differences.

Posted by: novakant at November 21, 2004 06:08 PM

Apparently the author of that Slate.com article hasn't studied up on his history:

Werwolf!: The History of the National Socialist Guerrilla Movement, 1944-1946

In the Slate article, Benjamin tries to prove the administration guilty of "sexing up" the German occupation by citing two history books that have almost nothing to say on the subject. That's hardly what you'd call evidence.

Further, he minimizes the significance of what those books report about the Werwolf resistance. Sure, there was guerrilla warfare, but measured by Benjamin's grand scale, "… little materialized." Additionally, he assures us, there was "no major campaign of sabotage … no destruction of water mains or energy plants worth noting" (emphasis added). Benjamin appears fully committed to "sexing down" the situation whenever possible.

What he apparently didn't bother to do is read Perry Biddiscombe's book (cited above) which gives full chapter and verse on Nazi-postwar guerrilla operations. Benjamin is right that the Werwolves were poorly organized, and the threat of attacks subsided after a several months of occupation. But they were very real. Prof. Biddicomb's survey of records by the U.S. Army Center of Military History shows that at least 39 combat deaths occurred in the first few months of the occupation. If the Nazis had been better organized, the Werwolf might well have given World War II GIs as much trouble as the thugs in Iraq are generating now.

If there is a difference, it's a quantitative difference, not qualitative. And Germany's utter destruction accounts for that.

Posted by: David at November 21, 2004 07:40 PM

"Yeah, the minute men were known for blowing up markets,"

Well, yes. But they didn't have a lot of explosives, so the approach was more to raid them for supplies.

"killing all professionals and intellectuals hoping to drive them out of the country,"

If you believe that all professionals and intellectuals were Tories, then yes. Otherwise they were considerably more selective. This part doesn't make sense to me for the iraqi terrorists. Why would they want those people to leave? I can see shaking them down for ransom, but getting them to leave the country? What does make sense is israeli hit teams doing that. Israel wins more the longer iraq stays completely disorganised. But there's zero hard evidence for that. Sure, there are israeli hit teams in the country but what we've seen documented about them is making raids into iran.

"using women and children as human shields,"

I don't remember any evidence for that in the american revolution.

"kidnapping for ransom"

Yes, we did that.

"and destroying the country's infastructure."

Kind of. There was a certain amount of burning things down on both sides, and sume bridge destruction etc, but again the lack of explosives made a big difference.

But the americans had a known government. Every colony had a functioning elected government already. They maybe had to run from the british when the british marched on whichever city they were in at the moment, but they were known politicians. Nobody knows who's running the iraqi resistance to the extent that it's getting run. Zarqawi appears to have some influence but it may be that the main reason iraqis have heard of him is the publicity we give him. The major part of his influence may be due to us.

The british had no doubt about Washington's name etc. Things were more open in those days.

Posted by: J Thomas at November 21, 2004 08:02 PM

"Killing intellectuals and professionals ... this part doesn't make sense to me for the iraqi terrorists."
- J Thomas

You forget that many of the insergents are islamists, and foriegners at that. They want to see the country fail so that there isn't a threat to God's own system...

Yes, destroying the oil infastructure makes no sense to someone who actually cared about his country... But even the Bathists were nilistic thugs, and the Islamists are beyond human reach.

You missed the point I was trying to make in the "blowing up markets," quote too. That was an example of a massacre, an atrosity against civilians. You can't come up with such a parallel because there aren't any.

Oh, by the way, where's your parallel between the American revolution and cutting civilian's heads off?

Posted by: Joshua Scholar at November 21, 2004 08:42 PM

This part doesn't make sense to me for the iraqi terrorists. Why would they want those people to leave? I can see shaking them down for ransom, but getting them to leave the country? What does make sense is israeli hit teams doing that. Israel wins more the longer iraq stays completely disorganised.

That's just disgusting. You're implying that the Israelis are killing professionals and intellectuals. Classy. Real classy.

But you don't get it. It didn't make sense for the Khmer Rouge to kill them all, but they did. It didn't make sense for Stalin, Mao, or the Nazis to kill their best and brightest or drive them out, but they did. Why? Because facists and dictators don't like people who think.

On the other hand, an organized Iraq is beneficial to Israel. Why? Because an organized Iraq will probably not be attacking Israel. On the other hand, an Iraq run by dictators and/or terrorists would.

Really, put down your anti-semitism or go back to dKos where it is accepted.

Posted by: Court at November 22, 2004 07:13 AM

FactCheck would like to note that David has not yet read the work he so readily cites to support his false, discredited theories of substantial German WWII resistance. To check this, ask him what the fifth word on the third line of page 193 is.

FactCheck would additionally like to note that there were no combat deaths of US troops in occupied Germany after Reims.

FactCheck is shocked, shocked to find out that a conservative supporter of the war in Iraq would cite a source he had not read. FactCheck is shocked, shocked that a conservative supporter of the war in Iraq would cherry pick his sources to prove something that's not true. Shocked, shocked, we tell you.

Posted by: FactCheck at November 22, 2004 10:22 AM

Only adults have difficulty with childproof caps.
Loan http://www.epaycash.com

Posted by: Loan at December 16, 2004 04:30 AM

Why bother building any more nuclear warheads until we use the ones we
have?
Payday Loan http://www.epaycash.com

Posted by: Payday Loan at December 16, 2004 11:10 AM

Dawn, n.:
The time when men of reason go to bed.
-- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
Payday Loans http://www.paylesspaydayloans.com

Posted by: Payday Loans at December 17, 2004 06:39 AM

ct party swingerdallas party swingerdc party swingerdiego party san swingerejs party swingerflorida party swingergay personals freegay personals free harrisburg pagay personals georgiagay personals hawaiigay personals in belfastgay personals in indiagay personals in jacksonvillegay personals in milwaukeegay personals in pittsburghgay personals in texasgay personals japangay personals kansasgay personals luckyclub paris swingerclub party sex swingerclub party swingerclub philadelphia swingerclub private swingerclub sacramento swingerclub swinger mexicoclub swinger tampaclub swinger torontoclub swinger vancouverclub swinger vegascolorado swinger clubadult personals in the ukadult personals photo ukdating internet singledating interracial singledating latin singledating lds singledating links singledating mailto russian single womandating match online singledating match singledating meet online singleamerican dating indianbest indian dating sitebest indian dating sitesadult sex chatadult sex chat aaaadult sex chat networkadult sex chat roomadult sex chat roomsadult sex chat sitesadult single chatadult single chat roomadult singles chat roomsadult stream chatasian dating lineasian dating localasian dating londonasian dating los angelesasian dating maleasian dating manasian dating man white womanasian dating manchesteradult finder friend site swingers.adultfriendfinder.comadult finder friend storyadult finder friend teamadult finder frienderadult finder friendlyadult finder frienfadult finder frinendadult finder groupadult finder jobadvice dating sexanal dating sexangelfire sex datingasian dating sexbangalore dating in sexbbw dating sexbbw sex datingbelgie dating sexbisexual dating sitebisexual dating web siteblack man dating interracialblack man dating white womanblack woman dating white manbritish dating manchristian dating manchristian dating man tipcool dating it man playdating a divorced manherpes dating serviceherpes dating serviceshispanic dating servicehispanic dating serviceshiv dating serviceshouston dating serviceshow to start a dating serviceindian dating servicesinteracial dating servicesyoung lesbian movieslesbian xxx movieslesbian teens movies

Posted by: dsff at May 5, 2005 08:14 AM
cool blog - thanks for the service

online casino

Posted by: casino at June 28, 2005 02:28 AM

Greetings From NY !

Posted by: casinos at July 7, 2005 12:41 AM

I agree with you the way you view the issue. I remember Jack London once said everything positive has a negative side; everything negative has positive side. It is also interesting to see different viewpoints & learn useful things in the discussion.

Posted by: penis pills at October 4, 2005 05:42 PM

viagra
cialis
levitra
meridia
xenical
propecia

Posted by: online casinos at October 7, 2005 12:16 AM

kosmetyki naturalne
kosmetyki
mieszkania w Warszawie
agencja reklamowa

Posted by: ap at December 1, 2005 09:23 AM

freetimes
jidds
fabrykapoe
sfworks

Posted by: artse at December 23, 2005 02:52 AM
Post a comment













Remember personal info?






Winner, The 2007 Weblog Awards, Best Middle East or Africa Blog

Pajamas Media BlogRoll Member



Testimonials

"I'm flattered such an excellent writer links to my stuff"
Johann Hari
Author of God Save the Queen?

"Terrific"
Andrew Sullivan
Author of Virtually Normal

"Brisk, bracing, sharp and thoughtful"
James Lileks
Author of The Gallery of Regrettable Food

"A hard-headed liberal who thinks and writes superbly"
Roger L. Simon
Author of Director's Cut

"Lively, vivid, and smart"
James Howard Kunstler
Author of The Geography of Nowhere


Contact Me

Send email to michaeltotten001 at gmail dot com


News Feeds




toysforiraq.gif



Link to Michael J. Totten with the logo button

totten_button.jpg


Tip Jar





Essays

Terror and Liberalism
Paul Berman, The American Prospect

The Men Who Would Be Orwell
Ron Rosenbaum, The New York Observer

Looking the World in the Eye
Robert D. Kaplan, The Atlantic Monthly

In the Eigth Circle of Thieves
E.L. Doctorow, The Nation

Against Rationalization
Christopher Hitchens, The Nation

The Wall
Yossi Klein Halevi, The New Republic

Jihad Versus McWorld
Benjamin Barber, The Atlantic Monthly

The Sunshine Warrior
Bill Keller, The New York Times Magazine

Power and Weakness
Robert Kagan, Policy Review

The Coming Anarchy
Robert D. Kaplan, The Atlantic Monthly

England Your England
George Orwell, The Lion and the Unicorn