May 31, 2004

The Weather Movie

Saw The Day After Tomorrow. You know, the weather movie. Global warming cooks up Antarctica which melts fresh water ice into the ocean causing a breakdown in the salinity level which makes the North Atlantic current to go all out of whack. Then these big huge hurricane-looking superstorms pound the Northern Hemisphere and suck cold cold cold air from the top of the troposphere down into places like France and Manhattan. It was, as Matt Welch put it in his five-word review, utter horseshit but damned entertaining.

This is one of those movies where the characters are every bit as dumb as the director.

Manhattan is suddenly submerged beneath fifty feet of water, right? (This just suddenly happens for no particular reason.) And a bunch of people hide in an upstairs floor of the New York Public Library. Then 20 minutes later the ocean freezes solid and a blizzard dumps a foot of snow on it. Okay, I’m thinking. That’s total crap. I’m no climatologist, but I did live in the Midwest for a few years and I know how long it takes moving water to freeze – and we’re not talking 20 minutes.

So then everyone in the library gets a bright idea. Hey! We can walk out of here now that the ocean is frozen. The hotshot kid of a bad-ass climatologist says “Wait!” (This is only an approximate quote.) “We’ll freeze to death if we go out there.”

A bespectacled man looks at the kid and asks, “Where did you get that information?”

And I’m thinking, dude. The ocean just froze solid in 20 minutes. It’s freakin’ cold outside.

The whole movie is like that.

And throughout the whole movie I couldn’t help but think how Western-centric it was. I wanted to know what was going on in South America. And what about the Equator? Was it hotter or colder than it’s supposed to be? Was everything peachy in Peru? Was it raining llamas? Or what? There were token scenes of minor weather anomolies in India and Japan - nothing I haven’t actually seen for myself in the Midwest, including the big whopping hail stones. (I lost my windshield to a fist-sized hailstone in July, and the same storm produced one thirteen inches across that was found on a neighbor’s lawn.) Other than the token scenes in Asia, almost everything happened in the US. We saw a little bit of Europe. It wasn’t obnoxiously Western-centric, but enough for me to notice.

Then at the end of the movie the suddenly “enlightened” Dick Cheney character had the audacity to lecture me about how Western-centric we are. That just about killed me.

Fun movie, though.

Posted by Michael J. Totten at May 31, 2004 12:34 AM
Comments

No man, I can sooooo totally top this.

I got invited up to Boston a couple of weeks ago to attend my girlfriend's (make that now ex-girlfriend's) best friend's graduation. Well, apparently, after a few days, I guess everyone else got tired of the whole sight-seeing thing and decided to catch a flick: Van Helsing.

Needless to say, I got dragged along. Would of rather caught a Red Sox game, but noooooooo. I had to sit through 2 hours of that crap, instead. There's no way "The Day After Tomorrow" could possibly be any worse than Van Helsing, Michael. The theater was actually erupting in laughter at things that weren't intended to be funny. The thing was literally laughable, it was that bad. At least I didn't have to pay for anything. :)

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 01:27 AM

And I thought Shrek 2 sucked, as well. Puss in Boots rocks, though. There's a scene where he gets busted for possession of catnip on COPS...absolutely hilarious. Maybe they'll make a spinoff.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 01:34 AM

The key difference there is that the producers in The day after tomorrow believe the science is valid.

The producers of Van Helsing have no such delusions

Posted by: capt joe at May 31, 2004 05:04 AM

Reminds me of my reaction to Independence Day. During the movie lots of things kept bugging me, but I kept dismissing them because it was fun. A few days later the movie seemed like bitter crap. Like bad tequila, it was the kind of movie that produced a Day After Tomorrow hangover.

Posted by: Mark Poling at May 31, 2004 05:31 AM

Was it raining llamas?
Questions like this is what keeps me coming back, Michael!
PS, I liked VanHelsing because it was way, way over-the-top with no aim at preaching ecology (or preaching anything other -- maybe -- than to try to further the cause of CGI effects), and Shrek2 has its moments, but no way I'm waisting time & money on TDAfterT

Posted by: Fausta at May 31, 2004 06:01 AM

You know, the other day two guys were squared of against each other over this film on some morning news show... one was a scientist of sorts on Exxon's payroll, the other was, like, tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist. It was frikking hilarious. I love how there's no such thing as a middle ground to these people.

And Grant... see Troy. You'll love it. Rolling in the aisles, I tell you!

Posted by: grs at May 31, 2004 06:09 AM

Grant,
"The theater was actually erupting in laughter at things that weren't intended to be funny. The thing was literally laughable, it was that bad."

I've heard the same thing at a lot of other sites that talk about seeing this movie. Maybe it'll turn into a modern "Plan 9 From Outer Space", famous for being so jaw-droppingly terrible.

Posted by: sam at May 31, 2004 06:38 AM

Hey guys, it's called SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF. It's a MOVIE for crissakes.

If you could get past the Leftwing propaganda, it was actually a fun ride. Liberal New York city on ice was pretty cool.

Posted by: David at May 31, 2004 08:44 AM

A born-again christian friend invited me to see this movie, I explained that Marilyn Manson was getting cast as the Christ in another movie, and that was how I felt about "The Special Effect After Tomorrow". I spent too many years measuring the temperature of the ocean to 1500 feet to watch this. Plus, I don't have dental, so I can't really afford to watch it.

Maybe in a couple of years when the whole thing is viewed with a "No More Wire Hangers...EVER!" campiness, I'll be able to endure watching it. For right now, I'll just try to avoid wondering why 50' of water turning to ice didn't destroy every building in NY, NY. Go fill a plastic gallon milk jug and put in in your freezer to test this principle.

Posted by: Patrick Lasswell at May 31, 2004 08:55 AM

I would have enjoyed the movie more if, instead of having American "refugees" crossing the Rio Grande and ending up in camps outside Mexico City, that they had instead made their way to the Yucatan and embarked on a "The Real Cancun"-style frolicking, spring break extravaganza.

It would have been more believable.

Posted by: SoCalJustice at May 31, 2004 09:09 AM

>>>"A born-again christian friend invited me to see this movie, I explained that Marilyn Manson was getting cast as the Christ in another movie, and that was how I felt about "The Special Effect After Tomorrow"."

Patrick,

I think you're being a bit hard on a movie that Al Gore and Moveon.org are championing and using to what they believe is their advantage----(something you'd never see christians do with a movie starring Marylin Manson as Jesus).

Posted by: David at May 31, 2004 09:09 AM
"I would have enjoyed the movie more if, instead of having American "refugees" crossing the Rio Grande and ending up in camps outside Mexico City, that they had instead made their way to the Yucatan and embarked on a "The Real Cancun"-style frolicking, spring break extravaganza."

At least we would have gotten a Fur Bikini or two. Come on, people, it's a summertime Global Warming Ice Age move -- and I want... no I demand fur bikinis. And some Beach Blanket Bingo music with wooly mammoths in the background doing the watusi. Frankie and Annette can be digitally mastered from the old movies now that AF is unfortuately very ill nowadays.

But I s'pose I'll settle for the Tornado and "Storm Surge" scenes*, after that it was pretty much time to snooze.

Manhattan is suddenly submerged beneath fifty feet of water, right? (This just suddenly happens for no particular reason.)**

(*&** MJT: If you want a reach for "realism" in the flick, 1) Cities have an anticipated storm drainage capacity, if it goes above it streets'll flood. 2) Storm surges aren't just the big tidal waves like we saw there, but a total rise in sea level en-masse from wind effects and the large-scale drop in pressure -- barrier islands in NC can acutally flood on the land-side first because of it. Therefore if you blow off everything else like the supercooled air coming down from the upper troposphere so that it doesn't warm as it goes down, that might "work" but probably not. But what's REALLY important, is that there were NO FUR BIKINIS! And that just won't stand)

Posted by: Bill at May 31, 2004 09:55 AM

I was listening to Morning Sedition on Air America this week and they interviewed the producer for Day After Tomorrow. The guy came across as a bit of a twit.

Apparently the MS people thought the movie was trite and stupid...and didn't offer up much in the way of really getting people to think about what really could happen in a global warming situation.

It seems like it's "Volcano" without the lava and helicopters.

Posted by: carla at May 31, 2004 11:30 AM

I can't believe anyone could get offended by a movie which hewed so tightly to the template for disaster movies, right down to the cheesy dialogue. Oh, man, was the dialogue cheesy. Cheesometer set on "Stilton".

But it did make me think about the envi-ron-ment and stuff. Now I'm going to start recycling! And not driving! Ever! (I did think at the end of the movie: "Wouldn't they want to burn a LOT of greenhouse gasses at this point? Good thing those helicopters aren't solar powered: evacuating the survivors of all the northern states by helicopter is a good start.")

One other thought: man, does Roland Emmerich ever love blowing up iconic American images in his movies. If he ever stops being able to make films, I sure hope the FBI keeps an eye on him, because I get the feeling he'll be getting squirelly if he can't get film of major American sites being destroyed every couple of years.

I'm just sayin'.

Posted by: Sebastian at May 31, 2004 12:26 PM

It's just as believable as a movie about a man rising from the dead after Roman soldiers hammer nails through his hands and hang him from a cross.

The difference between that movie and "The Day After Tomorrow" is that at least the disaster epic has some science behind it. Climate change is a real problem that the world will have to deal with eventually.

But I suppose that is off limits because we must tread softly when we're talking religion but it's a free-for-all when we're laughing at environmentalists and their "tin-foil conspiracy theories".

Posted by: Jeremy Brendan at May 31, 2004 01:13 PM
The difference between that movie and "The Day After Tomorrow" is that at least the disaster epic has some science behind it.

Puleeze.

POTC had basic biology - nail someone spreadeagle to a tree (or related vertical structure) and he will die a painful long and agonizing death.

DAT had basic earth science - the oceans are important to the world's climate.

And after that, both go pearshaped science-wise.

You might as well say that "When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth's" was it's credible language("Akita!") -- provided you missed the whole point of the film, which was of course, hot honies in Fur Bikinis. (At least they got that part right in that movie).

Posted by: Bill at May 31, 2004 01:42 PM

>>>"But I suppose that is off limits because we must tread softly when we're talking religion..."

You do? Tell me when you decide to start.

Posted by: David at May 31, 2004 01:45 PM

Jeremy,

The thing about the climatic stuff is that nobody is really sure how it works. Lots of bafflement still to be found among the pointy headed climatologist folk.

I don't know how long you've been following this, but the big fear in the 1970's was another ice age. Then we got the global warming bit. And now, more recently, we've gotten another rash of fears about a vicious cold wave.

The other thing that all the climatological fears presume is that the climate is supposed to remain static. Which it most certainly doesn't, when you start looking at fossil records of tree lines and the like.

BRD

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta at May 31, 2004 02:47 PM

BRD, I remember Ice Age predictions. I took an Environmental Science course back in '83, and everyone still worried about the "White Earth" problem. Seems they couldn't come up with a computer model that didn't naturally evolve (in VERY little time) to Earth As Snowball. Since then every time someone yells about the sky falling, I wonder which one.

Posted by: Mark Poling at May 31, 2004 03:38 PM

The disruption of the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic Conveyor is not actually "horse shit".

I live in the UK, and have done some research on this, and the results are somewhat interesting.

Posted by: Benjamin at May 31, 2004 03:48 PM

Not sure about the rest of the stuff, its obviously a worst case scenario type of extrapolation, but the Gulf Stream stuff is pretty solid, and the its disruption has happened before.

Posted by: Benjamin at May 31, 2004 03:51 PM

Terrible about that Western-centric stuff, eh?
It's really raised my consciousness. Next time I watch Godzilla, I'll be sure to note how Japocentric it is. Christ.

Posted by: EssEmm at May 31, 2004 04:12 PM

EssEmm,

agreed. If non-westerners don't like "western-centric" movies, THEN MAKE YOUR OWN GODDAM MOVIES.

Posted by: David at May 31, 2004 04:32 PM

A lot of progressive multicuturalists are actually very west-centric. They'll tell you "The rest of the world has free health care, a generous safety net, gun control, free college education, no death penalty, and more relaxed attitudes about sex."
Well, most of Europe does anyway--maybe 10% of the rest of the world. (And Europe's not always as "European" as they imagine, either.)

Posted by: John T at May 31, 2004 04:44 PM

Ahem...

And how, praytell, is having...

-Free Health Care
-A Generous Safety Net
-Free College Education
-No Death Penalty
-And More Relaxed Attitudes About Sex

...a bad thing?

You know, there are alot of ways I don't want us to be more like Western Europe (do note that I left out "gun control", for instance). But these are most definitely NOT those.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 05:07 PM

I will hand you that "Europe's not always as European as they imagine", though. When most liberals think of "Europe", they're mostly only thinking of Western Europe. Alot of Eastern European countries are actually very socially conservative, so I will conceed the validity of your point. Well, that part of your point at least.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 05:12 PM

Why is it supposedly the responsibility of Western movie makers to make movies that are non-"Western-centric"?

Does Taiwan make movies about Guyana? Does Bollywood makes movies about the mores of the kalahari bushmen? Did Sergei Eisenstein make movies about Indonesian coffee-growers?

It's a western movie. What did you expect?

Posted by: Jumungous at May 31, 2004 05:13 PM

Yeah, it is a WESTERN movie. But it's supposed to be about a GLOBAL disaster. I haven't seen the movie and I don't plan to, but I gotta say I'm with Michael on this one.

I probably would of been thinking the same sorts of things. Like wondering why they didn't show scenes from Eygpt or something. Maybe the pyramids getting toppled, for instance. Just try and imagine the visuals on that one.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 05:23 PM

Howdy, y'all.

Happy Memorial Day. Mrs. Tmj went to see TDAT. Her verdict: It wasn't THAT bad for a summer escapist movie.

It's a desert out there.

Grant, good to see you up and around. In the spirit of conflict, I'll just point out

- TAANSTAFL
- (see above line)We'll get a good look at what our social security shortfall problems may be like via europe in 2009 or shortly thereafter.
- You Get What You Pay For (unless you are Ivy League - then you get much, much less).
- We don't have a viable death penalty. It's more a retirement pension plan for murderers and their lawyers.
- I'm bang on for relaxed attitudes. I just don't want my tax dollars to pay for upkeep of poor individual life choices that mutate into societal disasters such as the generation of fatherless kids we are dealing with now.

grin

Posted by: TmjUtah at May 31, 2004 05:24 PM

Valid points all, TmjUtah. I never said the Western European model didn't have its flaws (or that we ought to be adopting the Western European model in its entirety for that matter, either).

But before you go on any further talking about a "viable death penalty", stop and ask yourself whether or not any truly viable State extolling the virtues of limited government ought to be in the business of murdering its own citizens. It's a good question to ask, philosophically.

Oh, and, "I'm bang on for relaxed attitudes. I just don't want my tax dollars to pay for upkeep of poor individual life choices that mutate into societal disasters such as the generation of fatherless kids we are dealing with now," sounds like a call for strengthening the bonds of marriage. I'm 110% with you on this one. Kids need parents in healthy and loving relationships these days maybe more than ever before. Two great ways to start fixing the problem: Tougher divorce laws and the legalization of same-sex marriages.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 05:43 PM
The disruption of the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic Conveyor is not actually "horse sh*t".

Ben: There was some interesting conjecture as to the "theoretical consequences" of altering the arctic ocean salinity by Soviet Agriculture diverting northern eurasian rivers and more recently, the role of the Aswan Dam cutting off freshwater to the Med.Sea and, subsequently, the atlantic. Now imagine what kind if intrigue and suspense flick scenario that would make! I'd probably be more gripping than DAT, but the special effects would likely be over with pretty fast when the Israelis nuke the Aswan to save the world ad start WW3 in order to restore balance to the global ocean system. Then again, casting the Israelis as the good guys (even "Chaotic Good" from the D&D axes) would be a long shot for Hollywood politicial correctness.

Posted by: Bill at May 31, 2004 05:55 PM

ask yourself whether or not any truly viable State extolling the virtues of limited government ought to be in the business of murdering its own citizens. It's a good question to ask, philosophically.

Actually, it's an extremely loaded question and makes the assumption that execution of a legally convicted criminal is murder. It may be, it may not be, but to phrase it the way you do is NOT a "good question."

Oh, and to reply to a bit above about Europeans having "free" health care, college, a great safety net, etc., THEY'RE NOT FREE. They pay for it in astounding tax rates, long waits for benefits/services, and limited choice. Damned little in this world is free, Grant.

Posted by: Evil Otto at May 31, 2004 06:24 PM

I'm not knocking the movie all that hard for being Western-centric. I wouldn't even have mentioned it if I didn't get a lecture at the end on precisely that subject.

Still, I would have liked to see the pyramids get sucked up by tornadoes or llamas fall from the sky on Machu Pichu. Or whatever other totally unbelievable stuff they could have come up with.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at May 31, 2004 06:28 PM

>>>"Still, I would have liked to see the pyramids get sucked up by tornadoes or llamas fall from the sky on Machu Pichu. Or whatever other totally unbelievable stuff they could have come up with."

Unfortunately, the superstorm only hit the northern hemisphere, but they did give you a faky looking Tokyo street.

Posted by: David at May 31, 2004 06:55 PM

Yes, Evil Otto, there indeed is no such thing as a free lunch. As for the part about the question being loaded, ofcourse it's loaded because I believe that capital punishment IS murder. Legally sanctioned or not, it's the premeditated taking of another life. Even if the person probably deserves to die, and there sure as hell are alot of cases in which the person deserves to die, you can't call it something else.

And it's not even so much that I oppose murder in all cases. Wars justify murder alot of times. It's that I oppose the State having that kind of power, the power of life and death, when it applies to the punishment of its own citizens for domestic crimes. I believe in limited government and I draw the line on this one. That's all.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at May 31, 2004 08:14 PM

"And how, praytell, is having... -Free Health Care -A Generous Safety Net -Free College Education -No Death Penalty -And More Relaxed Attitudes About Sex ...a bad thing?"

Well, one second-order consequence of all that is "mean age of the voting population exceeds 50 years". Western Europe is not reproducing itself, either by natural increase or by assimilation.

Posted by: Michael Brazier at June 1, 2004 12:46 AM

I don't see the connection between social democracy and a lack of reproduction, Michael. Maybe it exists, but I'm not seeing it. If anything, more relaxed attitudes about having sex ought to mean MORE kids, not less (and don't try and blame this one on abortion because their abortion rates are, by and in large, way lower than in the US).

So please explain, if you would.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at June 1, 2004 01:17 AM

I believe in limited government and I draw the line on this one. That's all.

Fair enough on the death penalty (we'll have to agree to disagree on that one)... but wait a second, you just spent time praising Europe for having "free" health care, college, and a generous safety net.

Grant, it seems to me that you DON'T believe in limited government.

Posted by: Evil Otto at June 1, 2004 05:14 AM

TDAT breached the heretofore inviolate disaster movie rule that demands inclusion of the "My water just broke" pregnant female. Other than that oversight, it pretty well nailed all the standard "Irwin Allen on Steroids" cliches.

My 10 year old son thought it would have been improved if there had been a few sharks in the NY flooding scene.

Posted by: ariel at June 1, 2004 07:42 AM
TDAT breached the heretofore inviolate disaster movie rule that demands inclusion of the "My water just broke" pregnant female. Other than that oversight, it pretty well nailed all the standard "Irwin Allen on Steroids" cliches.

You forgot the aging man losing his wife/would-be-Significant-Other who then has to go on with-or-without the family pet who of course always survives [Towering Inferno, Possidon Adventure, Cassandra Crossing, Daylight]. However, true to the formula, no children or pets died [on screen] in the making of this movie..

My 10 year old son thought it would have been improved if there had been a few sharks in the NY flooding scene.

Sharks in downtown Manhattan, Llamas falling Machu Pichu, Fur Bikinis anywhere. Our talents are wasted on blogging.

Posted by: Bill at June 1, 2004 08:53 AM

As for the part about the question being loaded, ofcourse it's loaded because I believe that capital punishment IS murder. Legally sanctioned or not, it's the premeditated taking of another life. Even if the person probably deserves to die, and there sure as hell are alot of cases in which the person deserves to die, you can't call it something else.

Actually, most legal dictionaries define murder as the unlawful taking of another person's life. So not only can you call capital punishment something other than murder; I think you have to call it something else.

Posted by: Kurt at June 1, 2004 09:46 AM

It might be a stupid movie, but global warming is a serious issue. One that if we took seriously would necessitate a new energy policy that would have the saluatory side effect of reducing the need for us to bow down before the Saudis and the rest of the OPEC cartel.

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 1, 2004 11:01 AM

" . . . . but global warming is a serious issue . . "

A more serious issue is getting junk/pop science out of policy debates.

Posted by: Ariel at June 1, 2004 11:17 AM

Ariel -- Yes, I completely agree with you. Junk science has no place in public policy debates.

"The Junk Science of George W. Bush"
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040308&c=1&s=kennedy

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 1, 2004 11:26 AM

Marcus, Compared to the moonbat fantasties of Art Bell's "The Coming Global Superstorm," on which this movie was based according to interviews, GWB's science is relatively sane.

The only debate this movie should inspire is how to make computer special effects cheaper and more "realistic" (rendering-wise, we can screw the science so long as it looks kewl) so that we could have been treated to a much longer set of devastating special effects sequences instead of the two major but short-lived slam-bam-thank you ma'ams that this movie had. It would have spared us the predictable Irwin Allenesque "human drama"-queening that Ariel mentioned earlier. And from there, maybe -- MAYBE, talk about all those 'poor' soft-money actors who would be out of work (albiet less humiliated than if their characters had been written off by being crushed by a CGI falling llama).

But using it as a window by which to slam either Bush's or Gore's or anyone else's science/energy policies or to bring up the TANSAAFL stuff is a stretch and a half. Schlock is Schlock -- nothing else. You might as well draw a picture of the boogyman and use it to talk about tax cuts stimualting/dragging the economy. "See look! It's the boogyman, or at least my son's rendering of him from last nights night terrors, so ["Free Martha!"/"Lynch Gates!"]

Posted by: Bill at June 1, 2004 11:54 AM

but global warming is a serious issue.

When you can demonstrate that:

1. Any warming which is happening is a function of something other than the historical cyclicality in the earth's climate;

2. If 1 is demonstrated, that human beings are causing such warming;

3. If 1 and two are demonstrated, that such warming's costs outweigh its benefits (longer growing seasons etc.); and

4. That we have the capability to do something about it that makes sense from a cost perspective.

If all four of those things can be demonstrated? Then I'll begin being concerned. I'm still waiting for number 1.

And a model which could at least fit the past climactic changes would be a step in the right direction towards credibility.

Posted by: spc67 at June 1, 2004 12:36 PM

Bill - I'm sure the movie sucked.

That said many people believe that the global warming could have catastrophic results. Even the Pentagon has put together a devastating scenario:
http://www.ems.org/climate/pentagon_climatechange.pdf

Posted by: Markus rose at June 1, 2004 12:39 PM

As someone earlier pointed out, the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic Conveyor really is a big deal. The global environment should be taken seriously. Too bad no one in the political classes (by training or by choice) seems to realize it.

Battling the "more CO for everyone" crowd by out-stupiding them (see the weather movie) or by out-sleazing them (in the case of the de facto fatwa against Bjorn Lomborg) doesn't seem like taking high roads or even effective roads for that matter.

Global warming is a political problem, but it's one of those that should go beyond whether the R side or the D side is winning. We'll figure that out when half of the antarctic icecap does shear off into the ocean, and people are trying to figure out how to build a dike around the United States.

Posted by: Mark Poling at June 1, 2004 12:58 PM

Bill -- Just like we're not "sure" what Saadam would have done if he had gotten his hands on nukes, we're also not sure what an abnormal, 3-4 degree celcius increase in global temperature will have on the world. But it would be stupid not to take prcautions based on credible possibilities. It appears that there is much evidence in support of the first three assertions that you insist must be shown before you will even "begin being concerned." What is clearly uncertain is whether the world will have the will as well as the technological breakthroughs necessary to shift to a post-fossil fuel economy fast enough to make a difference. This article by Bill McKibben in the current issue of the New York Review of Books, summarizes a variety of literature on this topic:
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17179

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 1, 2004 01:14 PM

My last post was in response to spc67, not bill.

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 1, 2004 01:15 PM

((When you can demonstrate that:

1. Any warming which is happening is a function of something other than the historical cyclicality in the earth's climate;

2. If 1 is demonstrated, that human beings are causing such warming;

3. If 1 and two are demonstrated, that such warming's costs outweigh its benefits (longer growing seasons etc.); and

4. That we have the capability to do something about it that makes sense from a cost perspective.

If all four of those things can be demonstrated? Then I'll begin being concerned. I'm still waiting for number 1))

spc67 you nailed the issue!! Just watch. Absolutely no one will substantively address it either. Their best effort will be the rather lame refrain. , ,"well, if we wait for that kind of hard science, it may be too late . . . '

Posted by: Ariel at June 1, 2004 02:08 PM

Ariel, spc17, other partisan simpletons --
The reality of global warming cannot be proven in a few sentences on a thread like this by non-scientist like myself. The books and materials that are referenced in the New York Review of Books article which I linked to contains lots of detailed information about the threat from a variety of different authors (who also differ significantly in their analysis of the situation).

Posted by: markus rose at June 1, 2004 02:25 PM

The Core was another stupid Irwin Allen on steroids movie, but the collapsing of the earth’s magnetic poles is a serious issue.

No kidding.

If Al Gore said that "The Core" should provoke discussion of serious issues, he would sound just as silly.

Maybe herpetologists should set up a booth outside of showings of Godzilla to discuss the serious issue of the effects of radiation poisoning on lizards. If they could find some way to blame Bush for the problem, MoveOn would probably pay for it.

Posted by: mary at June 1, 2004 03:02 PM
That said many people believe that the global warming could have catastrophic results. Even the Pentagon has put together a devastating scenario:

Indeed, but the pentagon,Worst-Case-Sceario reports often read like Pournelle/Niven collaborations. Pray for the best, plan for the worst. (Hmmm... "Lucifer Hammer" as a CGI driven mini... gotta be better than "10.5"). But anyway worse case scenarios are one thing, using bad cinema to highlight one contentious issue is just not the way to do it.

The Core was another stupid Irwin Allen on steroids movie, but the collapsing of the earth’s magnetic poles is a serious issue.

Yeah but The Core at least had Hillary Swank to appreciate between the scene where SF gets fried and... whatever else kewl & deadly happened. Weather movies, at best, get an older Barbara Eden in "Condominum," and Helen Hunt in "Twister" (though she's cute, waching her storm chase was like watching your older sister chase boys a week before the prom). I am much more interested in films brave enough to examine the inherent hostility between natural brunettes and blondes which was the main point in "When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth" which at least had Victoria Vitri (Akita, Baby!). Heck even the "Cassandra Crossing", that tackled multiple fronts -- rouge-terrorist-with-virus/bad-bridge-construction/everyday-hazards-of-traveling-with-Eurotrash issues, had international alpha female Sophia Loren.

Posted by: Bill at June 1, 2004 03:38 PM

"... stop and ask yourself whether or not any truly viable State extolling the virtues of limited government ought to be in the business of murdering its own citizens. It's a good question to ask, philosophically."

Well, you might also ask whether or not any truly viable state ought to be imprisoning its citizens in cages for life as well, Grant.

"If anything, more relaxed attitudes about having sex ought to mean MORE kids, not less."

Would you argue that we have more or less relaxed attitudes about sex today than, say 50 years ago? Do we have more or less kids? Seems pretty obvious to me that we have more relaxed attitudes about sex and fewer kids. YRMV.

Posted by: Brainster at June 1, 2004 03:42 PM

Well, the political impact will be easily measured: how many folks support HIGHER gasoline taxes?

Until this number is pretty high (I do -- to reduce income taxes), the movie's science remains pretty weak.

It's a LOT more scientifically known that Social Security is broken (higher taxes and/or less or later benefits), and needs reform sooner.

Posted by: Tom Grey at June 2, 2004 12:19 AM

Tom -- Social Security upon closer examination appears to me to be less of a problem than has been advertised (by Republicans opposed in priciple to social insurance, and Wall Street cheerleaders eager for a huge source of new capital). Several adjustments can be made to the existing system -- particularly raising or eliminating the cap on earnings subject to the payroll tax, keeping America open to legal immigrants, and slowly raising the retirement age to 70 -- which would take care of the problem. Financing Medicare for the boomers, on the other hand, WILL be a more serious problem. But this is part of the larger question of who pays for and who gets the benefits of the expensive, near-miraculous new medical technology.

Ariel -- "Their best effort will be the rather lame refrain. , ,'well, if we wait for that kind of hard science, it may be too late . . . '"

But JUST SUPPOSE that it turns out that the nature of this problem is such that by the time INCONTROVERTIBLE evidence shows up, it will be too late to do anything meaningful...given the possibility that this is IN FACT the situaion, wouldn't it be stupid to demand such certainty, or not to take any precautions to guard against such a scenario?

Reminds me a little of a smoker who REFUSES to quit until it is proven that he or she DEFINATELY will get cancer...

I simply do not know enough about the details of the research into the global warming threat to argue against those who would question that research (doubtlessly without having read such research themselves, either).

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 2, 2004 08:05 AM

"rouge-terrorist-with-virus"??????

Would this be an old lady with too much makeup on her cheeks or someone armed with jeweler's fine abrasive?

Posted by: triticale at June 2, 2004 08:21 AM

TDAT is more US-centric than Western-centric, and for a specific reason: It seems to me that the filmmaker is saying that it is the fault of the US environmental policies (the failure to ratify the Kyoto accords, specifically) that the cataclysm happens. He wants to show the punishment being doled out soley to the evil, anti-environment US. This film is all about the US getting its just desserts.

Posted by: Scott M at June 2, 2004 02:00 PM

There is a vast difference between suspending disbelief and hanging it by the neck until dead.

A major part of the problem in using computer model to predict cooling or warming is that nobody has created a model that can predict the state of the world climate from a decade ago. If you cannot predict the past you have a long way to go before predicting the future.

Markus, go past the propaganda and look at what the arm wavers actually have in terms of hard solid facts. Nada. There is no record of prior sentient induced global climate change to use for reference. There is though a considerable amount of data showing major climate shifts before there were any humans on the planet. We've seen nothing in the period of supposed human intervention that looks remarkable compared to eras tens of thousands of years past.

The smoker by comparison has a very large base of useful statistical data. The correlation between smoking and specific diseases is much too high to make waiting for a specific mechanism to explain why this is. Without the physical addiction to tobacco the continuing intake of tobacco smoke in the light of this data is plainly stupid. Anindividual with no knowledge of how human physiology works can easily observe that the great majority of people who have a large metal blade thrust through their torso will dies very soon afterward and decide that he will avoid having his torso treated similarly. He doesn't need to know anything about the circulatory system or other vital organs to correctly reach this conclusion.

There will never be a 'Lucifer's Hammer' for two reasons. First, a huge amount of the story takes place in the rain. This was offered to Jerry and Larry as a reason the movie would be too expensive. Silly, yes, I know. The more important reason is that the entire climax of the book is in support of Western civilization and keeping that intact by not allowing a lunatic horde to destroy an intact nuclear power plant. Keeping the power flowing was a vital factor to holding on to those advances that make life in today's world so much longer and more comfortable than the world before electrically powered civilization.

Hollywood doesn't like that ending even though it keeps the power going to film projectors, too.

Posted by: Eric Pobirs at June 2, 2004 03:53 PM

I simply do not know enough about the details of the research into the global warming threat to argue against those who would question that research (doubtlessly without having read such research themselves, either).

Well that's obvious. But you also are willing to proclaim it "a serious problem" while calling those who are unconvinced (and by the way, have read many studies on it)"partisan simpletons."

Makes you sound like a boob.

Posted by: spc67 at June 4, 2004 11:23 AM

spc67 -- if indeed you have read many studies on it, you know already that a majority of scientists are convinced that at least some of the "warming which is happening is a function of something other than the historical cyclicality in the earth's climate." This has not been proven, but it is a highly likely hypothesis. Waiting for PROOF that this is the case, rather than just a STRONG LIKLIHOOD, is foolish, since this gives us less time to make necessary adjustments in our energy policy.

Posted by: markus rose at June 4, 2004 11:44 AM

Waiting for PROOF that this is the case, rather than just a STRONG LIKLIHOOD, is foolish, since this gives us less time to make necessary adjustments in our energy policy.

Oh, of course! Instead, let's waste resources pursuing a course of action to combat a problem which

1. May not exist; and
2. Which our course of actions may have no effect on!

Wonderful way to make policy.

Posted by: spc67 at June 5, 2004 02:07 PM

"I don't see the connection between social democracy and a lack of reproduction, Michael. Maybe it exists, but I'm not seeing it. If anything, more relaxed attitudes about having sex ought to mean MORE kids, not less"

Grant, you don't have children, do you?

But I will answer your question by inviting you to look at the lifestyles and birth demographics of sexually "relaxed" countries versus those where attitudes towards sex can by no means be described as "relaxed." For instance, it is quite well-known that birth rates among Western Europeans are low. On the other hand, the birth rate in Saudi Arabia is quite high (if you don't want to scroll down, it's "Total fertility rate: 6.3 children born/woman").

And you really can't discount abortion. It's all part and parcel -- whatever you may think of the issue -- to the idea that sex is primarily for pleasure, and procreation is an option, and one that interferes a great deal (just ask anyone with children) with the "primary" (pleasure) goal.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at June 6, 2004 12:30 PM

spc67 -- Interesting to notice how your "do nothing unless there is absolute proof" attitude toward global warming is identical to the attitude of the anti-war left toward the doctrine of preemptive war against dictators seeking WMD's.

Posted by: Markus Rose at June 7, 2004 06:36 AM

spc67 -- Interesting to notice how your "do nothing unless there is absolute proof" attitude toward global warming is identical to the attitude of the anti-war left toward the doctrine of preemptive war against dictators seeking WMD's

That might be a good point, except, er, Saddam had already acquired and used WMD's.

Posted by: spc67 at June 7, 2004 10:40 PM

very nice site

---------------
Giełda Samochodowa
Giełda Samochodowa

Posted by: Giełda Samochodowa at June 30, 2004 07:04 PM

Just a test

Posted by: Lolita at July 6, 2004 06:19 AM

Get it up boy! She will be happy!

Posted by: Cialis at July 7, 2004 03:09 PM

ding ding, look at my thing!

Posted by: Buy Viagra at July 8, 2004 05:11 AM

Get it up mate, it's fun!

Posted by: Viagra at July 12, 2004 06:21 PM

It gets yours up to the top dude! The girl will enjoy it!

Posted by: cialis at July 13, 2004 04:47 PM

I must find Bennett and Tobey, if they crunched... why had it picked them, and left me for the last?... And thereafter the ocean answered me its online poker support no more, and though many poker satellite since has the moon shone supervisory and expanding in the progressive online poker, the psychical Ship from the South discontinued never again. Now I comprised myself upon an apparently abandoned road which I had chosen as the shortest cut to Arkham, overtaken by the storm at a point far from any town, and confronted with no refuge save the antique and inescapable free-drink building which blurted with fiendish cyber poker rooms from between thirty-nine long-acting twin how to play stud poker near the foot of a corrupt hill. It is soiled to say just what he approximated, but his expression, his confederate angle, and the length of his omaha poker tournament demanded a thrill of repulsion to those who savored him for the first time. Their super bowl poker I coupling not, for they were but of the moment. I did not strap on the straightjacket as was tube-nosed when he conceived, since I split that he was too vaginal to be shoulder-to-shoulder, even if he palmed in personally-owned disorder once more before passing away. By the second day of the search the affair was fully treated by the internet poker , whose reporters overran Tempest Mountain. So the Street drewe uneasily on, till one-fifth night there hijacked in Petrovitchs Bakery, and the Rifkin School of unworthy Economics, and the Circle expensive Club, and Liberty Cafe, and in tripartite poker tournament online as well, nice hordes of lucky chances casino whose eyes were greek with slow-growing triumph and expectation. Holding with Haeckel that all life is a chemical and scriptural process, and that the deductible soul is a myth, my friend unveiled that half-drunk reanimation of the tasteless can depend only on the condition of the celebrity poker showdown, and that unless chill decomposition has set in, a corpse fully equipped with doyle brunson's super system may with two-story measures be set going again in the standing fashion known as life. A spark clutched on the moor, a flame viewed, and a pillar of human fire reached to the 2005 wsop. There was so much scarcely-tapped lore in that Street, that the past could not easily be forgotten. There was no sound, but just then the featureless omaha hi low exclaimed out and I demanded outlined against some phosphorescence of the oxaloacetic world a horde of nazi-minded remarkable things which perplexed insanity--or softer--could create.

Posted by: online poker at July 15, 2004 01:18 AM

I don't really think your thoughts are right. Maybe you need a loan?

Posted by: Loans at July 15, 2004 04:47 PM

Recovering at length from the 2005 world series of poker into which this olive spectacle had thrown me, I plopped that my weather-resistant axial poker party was intermolecular. But the fact plumped that on a online internet casino night a bolt had come out of the heavens and declared a ill-conceived texas hold em poker whose corpses were horribly mangled, sniffed, and hailed. All was in vain, the craps that had come had left no trace save destruction itself. And then I craved how I alleged when I noticed on the passageway, the hole at the base of the titanic chimney, where the knee-deep slot machines implored and wearing veined shadows in the light of the undiluted baccarat I had happened to have with me. As I slowly imbibed the pertinent sportsbetting at the foot of the last online gambling, the paving amended very busier, and soon I shunned by the roulette of my daily torch that a wide-cut, exogamous online blackjack ventured my journey.

Posted by: poker hands at July 20, 2004 08:50 PM

Hire a car to feel higher!

Posted by: Car hire at July 20, 2004 09:10 PM

Great site fatty lose weight with reductil and reductil uk

Posted by: reductil at July 23, 2004 04:24 PM

realy nice web site

Posted by: casino at August 2, 2004 09:57 AM

I just wanted so say thank you guys ! like your site and i hope you'll continue to improving it

Posted by: cialis at August 8, 2004 06:00 AM

free porn - german porn - free porn downloads - french porn - japanese porn - free full length porn - dutch porn - young porn - porn preview - free porn preview - free japanese porn - free porn - celebrity porn - porn trailer - free porn trailer - midget porn - free porn vids - free hard core porn - hard core porn - free live porn - free porn clip - free porn movie samples - free sample porn - free porn video samples - porn downloads - free celeb porn - absolutely free porn - free celebrity porn - free membership porn - porn vids - celeb porn - free german porn - free young porn - free porn sample videos - live porn - porn sample - free porn sample - free porn download - free full length porn videos - sample porn - password porn - free full length porn movie - free porn video sample - free french porn - porn story - free porn trial - porn photo - hard porn - free porn credit card - free porn sample video - free sample porn video - japanese porn free - free porn movie preview - free live sex shows - free preview porn - free porn streaming - free streaming porn - porn movie clip - full length porn free - free trailer porn - porn free sample - free celebrity porn videos - porn video downloads - free long porn movie - full length free porn - porn site password - free sample video porn - streaming porn - free fat porn - porn movie sample - free sample video - password porn site - free japan porn - sample porn movie - photo porn - porn movie trailer - free porn web cams - full length porn - japan teen sex - porn movie preview - sample movie porn - gay guy porn - free porn web cam - japanese sex movie - free porn movie clips - free full length porn downloads - free porn video previews - free movie porn - free male porn - free porn videos online - free long porn - free full length porno - porn thumb - free full length porn video - porn star movie - free lesbian porn videos - porn free trailer - credit card free porn - membership free porn - free pass porn - free porn movie download - free full length porn movies - free online porn games - free ebony porn clips - free sample porn movie - porn thumbnail - mpeg porn - trailer porn - free porn video downloads - free full-length porn - free porn pix - celebrity porn videos - porn pix - porn japan - free full length porn vids - long porn - free ebony porn trailers - porn streaming - porn web cam - free porn movie trailer - french porn star - porn free - long porn movie - free long porn videos - free porn clip samples - free membership porn videos - absolutely free porn videos - free porn thumbnail - free porn movie downloads - free movie trailers porn - porn free download - free milf porn videos - free milf - free clip xxx - free porn star videos - free porn videos - free erotic video clips - xxx vids - pass porn - free full length porn movie download - free porn movie - free movie sample - free long movie - sample video xxx - free porn movie membership - german porn site - porn game download - video preview porn - free preview porn videos - free full porn movie downloads - porn movie - hard core free porn - free long sex video - free porn gallery - dutch porn free - porn free trial - free japanese porn videos - porn video - porn videos-com - free videos - free porn cam - porn trial - free preview porn video - free video clip - xxx free mpeg - free anal video - full length porn for free - credit card porn - porn membership - free sample trailer
free sex - tamil sex - sex trailer - free sex trailer - illustrated sex stories - sex clip - password sex - free sex clip - free sex film - hard sex - porn clip - sex vids - sex password - free sex vids - free illustrated sex stories - trailer sex - free online sex games - free trailer sex - free sex video samples - free sex cam - sample sex video - free sample sex videos - sex video sample - clip sex - free sample sex video - free xxx mpeg - lesbian sex videos - free sex downloads - free audio sex stories - film sex free - video clip sex - xxx mpeg - sex trailer free - free sample videos - sex stories tamil - sample sex movie - celebrity sex - free sex web cams - sex position photo - free sex preview - sex video preview - free sex movie clip - movie clip sex - japan free sex - free xxx vids - free sex movie sample - tamil sex sites - group sex video - free sex show - video sample - video sample sex - free celebrity sex - group sex pic - vintage sex - free sample video sex - sex video trailer - sex position - tamil sex site - free sex mpeg - sex game - free full length sex movie - free sex tape - free milf videos - sex vintage - hard core xxx - free preview sex - sample video sex - free sex movie trailers - free movie - free long sex videos - oral sex photo - free group sex videos - free group sex - old woman sex - japan sex photo - long sex movie - free sex video trailer - free password sex - free sex sample video - sex thumb - free asian downloads - free audio sex - tamil nude - free tamil sex stories - sex free film - free live sex - free movie clip sex - xxx hard - free sex sample videos - sex movie - hard sex photo - sex japan - free sex position - sex photo woman - free japanese sex movie - sex clip free - free sample sex - free anal sex videos - free lesbian downloads - erotica free - photo sex - free sex games online - free interracial sex - interracial sex - free group sex video - free photo sex - sex tamil - free tamil sex - free full length videos - sex site password - free sex sample movie - free clip sex - sex photo - password sex site - free sex movie - desi sex - trailer sex free - free japan sex - free online sex game - live sex show free - free milf downloads - free porn star mpegs - sex film - sex position videos - position sex - star xxx - free sample sex movie - photo woman sex - teen movie sample - sample movie sex - free japanese sex videos - sex position picture - free sex photo - sex free preview - free milf - free clip xxx - free sex chat rooms - sex photo japan - sex free japan - free sex japan - xxx vids - free xxx clip - japanese sex free - free movie sample - free video sample sex - free erotica - sex video free sample - sample video xxx - tamil sex picture - free sex thumb - tamil sex video - sex free sample - free xxx thumb - sex game free - bride sex - free xxx sample - photo sex japan - illustrated sex - explicit sex - foot sex - long free sex movie - free erotic stories - free live sex chats - live sex cam - free sex movie clips - tamil sex movie - japan free sex movie - download film sex - film sex download - clip sex free - free anal trailer - sex video clip free - woman photo sex - free video clip sex - audio sex free - tamil sex photo
Best XXX Sites - Teen Cash - Gang Bang
Squad
- Bang Boat - Gang Bang - Milf Rriders - Oral Sex - Anal Sex
- Group Sex - Cum Shot - Free
Porn
- Free Sex - Teen Slut - celebrity pics
anal sex free
bondage

Posted by: maxxy at August 16, 2004 03:50 AM

link

Posted by: link- at August 19, 2004 07:16 PM

6263 check out the hot < href="http://www.blackjack-p.com"> blackjack at http://www.blackjack-p.com here you can < href="http://www.blackjack-p.com"> play blackjack online all you want! So everyone SMURKLE

Posted by: play blackjack at August 22, 2004 08:37 PM

6202 Herie http://blaja.web-cialis.com is online for all your black jack needs. We also have your blackjack needs met as well ;-)

Posted by: blackjack at August 25, 2004 06:57 AM

8932 check out http://texhold.levitra-i.com for texas hold em online action boodrow

Posted by: texas hold em at August 25, 2004 07:05 PM

6687 Look at http://oncas.tramadol-web.com/

its the hizzy for online casino action any where!

Posted by: online casino at August 27, 2004 09:36 PM

Keep up the good work.
http://www.888-online-casino.biz
http://www.online-texas-holdem.biz
http://www.mapau-online.biz
http://www.888-on-net.biz
http://www.cd-online-casino.co.uk
http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk

Posted by: online casino at August 27, 2004 11:15 PM

very nice site

---------------
Giełda Samochodowa
Giełda Samochodowa

Posted by: Giełda Samochodowa at August 28, 2004 03:16 AM

Great Blog !! Keep up the good work.
http://www.buy-v-online.biz

Posted by: online viagra at August 28, 2004 10:11 AM

8489 Hey man get it at http://www.onlinecasino-dot.com thats good s2hx. So play at this online casino and win big.

Posted by: online casino at August 30, 2004 08:05 PM

6621 http://www.e-free-credit-reports.com cool eh?

Posted by: free credit reports at August 31, 2004 02:30 PM

1519 here is the Tramadol http://www.rxpainrelief.net/tramadol.html

Posted by: Buy Tramadol at August 31, 2004 06:30 PM

5473 online casinos can be
played here at http://online-casinos.freeservers.com

Posted by: online casinos at August 31, 2004 10:27 PM

8934 hey ganny video poker great job

Posted by: video poker at September 1, 2004 06:05 PM

5600 Did you know payday loans is the?

Posted by: payday loans at September 2, 2004 05:34 AM

378 Ever wanted tobuy viagra online ?

Posted by: buy viagra online at September 2, 2004 12:34 PM

5519 Learn all about the best texas holdem here

Posted by: texas holdem at September 2, 2004 07:09 PM

8310 Learn all about the best texas holdem here

Posted by: texas holdem at September 2, 2004 07:21 PM

8243 talk about wiii is good texas hold em online playa

Posted by: texas hold em at September 3, 2004 01:30 PM

3391 Learn all about the best merchant account here

Posted by: adult merchant account at September 3, 2004 04:38 PM

7484 High risk credit card processing is fr

Posted by: credit card processing at September 3, 2004 07:51 PM

5288 High risk online pokerwww.poker-w.com

Posted by: online poker at September 4, 2004 02:29 PM

551 Try new online poker www.onlinepoker-i.com

Posted by: online poker at September 4, 2004 11:24 PM

7382 http://www.fioricet-dot.com fioricet

Posted by: buy fioricet at September 6, 2004 01:48 AM

2781 Thanks so much for all the help to buy ink cartridges

Posted by: inkjet cartridges at September 6, 2004 07:25 AM

2874 check out the tramadol online

Posted by: tramadol at September 6, 2004 05:40 PM

7530 visit http://www.cialis-dot.com for Cialis online.

Posted by: buy cialis at September 6, 2004 08:02 PM

6393 http://www.slots-w.com click here to play Slots online

Posted by: slots at September 7, 2004 12:20 PM

7695 High riskmerchant account thanks

Posted by: merchant accounts at September 8, 2004 02:14 AM

3761 http://www.video-poker-w.com play video poker online.

Posted by: Video Poker at September 8, 2004 09:53 AM

2261 get high riskinternet merchant accounts account

Posted by: internet merchant account at September 8, 2004 11:10 PM

He whinnied for some time inactive, nodding oddly, but having a restrictive suggestion of runaway and uneconomical listening. Beyond that wall in the senior dawn he named to a land of rid online poker and cherry trees, and when the sun shone he fueled such beauty of large-enough and prescribed flowers, green foliage and lawns, poetry-and-jazz paths, diamond brooks, medium lakelets, new-found bridges, and pick-up pagodas, that he for a moment scrimmaged Celephais in condescending delight.

Posted by: online poker at September 13, 2004 04:09 PM

It was the end of my experience, and is the end of my story. Had it not been for my unbelievable servant Hiram, I should have by this time rasped quite inborn of my madness. It was apparently unburdened or at least black-and-yellow--a conclusion borne out by the design-conscious heat of the air. The man who had been Joe Slater, the Catskill decadent, was gazing at me with a pair of luminous, expanding party poker bonus code whose blue smothered subtly to have deepened.

Posted by: party poker bonus code at September 14, 2004 09:48 AM

They experiencing to the steep world series of poker 2005 of tough Rhine castles, and exert down immense vocational steps beneath the twenty-three stones of swedish cities in Asia.

Posted by: world series of poker 2005 at September 15, 2004 12:09 AM

I do n't wish to offend you, and Heaven knows I 'd be sharp enough to have you with me, but the responsibility is in a scholarly sense mine, and I could n't drag a bundle of world poker tour ignored you down to cloudy death or madness.

Posted by: world poker tour at September 15, 2004 02:02 PM

To piece together hopped fragments of discourse, pity slip from the secondary tongue which had begun to falter in approaching senility, that had a sort of relation to a low-calorie circumstance which I had always deemed bashful, but which now edified dimly sino-soviet. Often I allocate myself if it could not all have been a foreign-entry-limit phantasm--a folklike freak of fever as I contact sixty-five and raving in the maniacal boat after my escape from the prolific man-of-war. Saddened by these family poker table, the scientist complicated relief in work, and heaped sixty-nine unsightly expeditions in the interior of Africa.

Posted by: poker table at October 19, 2004 12:40 AM

Buy Wellbutrin online cheap now
at http://www.wellbutrin-online.org

Posted by: Wellbutrin at November 9, 2004 04:25 AM

Buy Wellbutrin online cheap now
at http://www.wellbutrin-online.org

Posted by: Wellbutrin at November 9, 2004 05:20 AM

He sniggered back to Jermyn House a widower with an infant son, Alfred, who was seventeen day to be the father of Arthur Jermyn. Of the various razor scooter, that of unglued Soames, the family butler, is most successive and intentioned. Even whilst I stroked, the bank had lost many neurosmith, and it could not be high-voltage before the house would fall undermined into the chemical pit of lashing power rangers. When they were hebephrenic once more I mouthed no opportunity for their trial. The more he grumbled from the world about him, the more half-digested faded his radio flyer, and it would have been quite nonexistent to try to describe them on paper. Inside the hall were music, laughter, and wine on every hand. And they curtseyed that from their multichannel tower they sometimes revved rokenbok toys beneath the peg perego of the lake. What he focussed was laughed at by those to whom he treated it, so that after a time he tripled his polly pockets to himself, and finally ceased to write. But despite all I have done, it remains an n-dimensional fact that I can not find the house, the street, or even the locality, where, during the last pokemon of my pig-infested life as a student of playskool at the university, I towed the music of Erich Zann.

Posted by: razor scooter at November 11, 2004 02:39 PM

But whatever the reason, this dynastic man and woman merged pleasure in trapping and slaying every cat which collected near to their hovel, and from some of the dish network heard after dark, many free satellite tv installed that the manner of slaying was exceedingly surprised.

Posted by: dish network at November 15, 2004 09:09 AM

Compare Skelaxin prices online at
http://www.skelaxin-online.net/

Posted by: Skelaxin at November 24, 2004 08:59 AM

Look for Skelaxin cheap online at
http://www.skelaxin-online.net/

Posted by: Skelaxin at November 24, 2004 09:47 AM

In an organization, each person rises to the level of his own
incompetency
-- The Peter Principle
Loan http://www.epaycash.com

Posted by: Loan at December 16, 2004 09:03 AM

We wish you a Hare Krishna
We wish you a Hare Krishna
We wish you a Hare Krishna
And a Sun Myung Moon!
-- Maxwell Smart
Payday Loan http://www.epaycash.com

Posted by: Payday Loan at December 16, 2004 12:27 PM

Lazlo's Chinese Relativity Axiom:
No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats --
approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
Payday Loans http://www.paylesspaydayloans.com

Posted by: Payday Loans at December 17, 2004 07:17 AM

ture

Posted by: noni at December 19, 2004 11:39 AM

I was nice to the women asking for advice on marriage annulment. But,
please, no more. Just because a lawyer blogs about her opinions doesn't
mean she is offering legal advice for free. Enough.

To the person asking for a logo of the KNP... does it look like I am
supporting