Michael, calm down bro. Edwards finishing 3rd (or 4th by 0.001% or something) is pretty inconsequential. Look at these two states...Iowa and New Hampshire. Know what's missing? BLACK PEOPLE!!! And moderates as well.

Edwards is well-positioned to capitalize on both the Black and Centrist vote in South Carolina. He's still ahead in the polls. Dean will drop off the face of the earth there, and Kerry might have a much harder time as well.

Worry if Kerry pulls off the upset in SC. Or if he pulls in a very close second. That's what'll really matter. That and Wesley Clark hopefully being Wesley Clark, making a fool of himself. Look for Edwards to win big and for Kerry and Clark to trail miserably...that'll be huge if it happens.

"John Kerry and Howard Dean over John Edwards?"

Not a big surprise. New Hampshire is practically a suburb of Boston. And Vermont is another neighbor. Do you realize just how long NHers have been reading the names "John Kerry" and "Howard Dean" in their newspapers? How much longer than "John Edwards"? The former, double-digit years. The latter, maybe a few months, if that.

On the other hand, that situation won't repeat again, save in Maine. Which isn't exactly a critical primary state.

Presumably Edwards will take South Carolina, and get some push out of that. Of course, if he doesn't, he's doomed.

I'm keeping my eye on Michigan.

Interesting that Lieberman don't get totally stomped out, although I wouldn't read too much into that.

My hah-hah (in the voice of Nelson from The Simpsons) is that, last I'd looked, Al Sharpton had garnered, in the entire state, a big whopping whole 338 votes. Hah-hah.

Now, wait a minute. It's just ridiculous to say that New Hampshire and Iowa don't have moderates. That's nuts. If those two states aren't crammed with plenty of moderates, what states are?

"Look for Edwards to win big and for Kerry and Clark to trail miserably...that'll be huge if it happens."

No, I'm afraid it won't be. That's what's expected. What would be huge is if it doesn't happen. It's be good for Edwards, as I said, but it's merely a necessary hurdle.

Edwards is far and away Black America's favorite candidate...besides Sharpton. He's Clintonesque. And, the "Two Americas" thing strikes a chord with minorities living in that second one. Trust me.

Yeah, okay...Iowa and New Hampshire DO have plenty of moderates. BUT the average Democrat in those two places is hardly moderate. Democrats in SC are damned Centrist, they're not in Iowa and NH. That's what I meant.

Gary,

I lived in Iowa for four years. The whole dang state is moderate. Few loonies of any stripe.

My home state of Oregon is filled to the rafters with every kind of goofball imaginable, plus some extras. In Portland we have, well, you know what we have. And out in the desert in the east there are the other kind. Love the place and the people, though.

"That's what's expected. What would be huge is if it doesn't happen."...

I gotta disagree with you there, buddy. Edwards is expected to win and if he doesn't he's toast, you're right. But alot of people are crowning John Kerry with frontrunner status and expecting him to kick ass everywhere he goes. Everybody's talking ELECTABILITY and ELECTABILITY he ain't. A distant second or even third in SC would go a long way to bring Kerry down a notch in the eyes of most people. It would reveal his ultimate weakness for all to see: The South.

A Yankee Ivory Tower Liberal who voted against the War in '91, opposes the Death Penalty on principle, and who's appeared in a million and a half clips arm-in-arm with Michael Dukakis IS NOT ELECTABLE!!!

God, I pray people wake up to this soon.

Yeah, you know I lived in Seattle for eight years, Michael, so naturally I travelled around the region quite a bit, from up in BC and Vancouver and Victoria, out east into the Inland Empire, and Idaho, and, of course, down through Oregon many many times, including Portland (and down through Khal-ee-for-nee-ah, as Ahnold says).

I've never lived in Iowa, just passed through rapidly a handful of times, but when I was working as a political pollster, I spent months polling Iowans, and have talked to literally thousands of them about their political opinions, which is more than most Iowans have, which is why I think I have some faint grasp of Iowan political opinion. Vilsack is a pretty moderate Democrat, and the Democrats there are a "normal" spread.

I don't know what Grant's definition of a "moderate" is. But New Hampshire used to be one of, if not the most, conservative states in the nation, and while that's dramatically changed in the last twenty years -- something like 65% of the present population are immigrants, including many from Massachusetts -- it's still got plenty of moderates, and not an overwhelming number of looney leftists, as well. Jeanne Shaheen is hardly a raving extremist.

And I'm now living in the People's Republic of Boulder, grew up in NYC, and spent plenty of time in Berkley, so I rather have a grasp of what a true crunchy-granola, save-the-lesbian-vegan-ducks set of folks are, as well. (3/4s of this town.)

And neither Iowa or NH are over-run with them (though, naturally, a university town like Ames always has a nice sprinkling).

I don't have any personal experience to draw on with South Carolina, save for my usual massive amounts of reading, but what South Carolina has is a lot of conservative Democrats, which is apparently what Grant means by "moderates." (Conservative [for Democrats] with an extremely heavy religious component.)

I shouldn't be surprised, but listening to Dean's "I Don't Wanna Be Divided Anymore" speech in New Hampshire, I am tempted to throw a shoe at the screen. No wonder so many people don't vote at all. Yikes. No replies necessary. I'm just disgusted and wanted to record it somewhere.

"John Kerry with frontrunner status and expecting him to kick ass everywhere he goes."

No, they're not. You really don't seem very familiar with the media punditry on this, but I don't care to go and quote when you can simply read the major papers for yourself. The only folks expecting Kerry to win in SC are Kerry workers. I mean, the man just this week famously said Democrats didn't need to win in the south (an incredibly bone-headed thing to say, even though it may be true -- but you don't say it where it gets into the news, idjit).

"A distant second or even third in SC would go a long way to bring Kerry down a notch in the eyes of most people."

If Kerry does second, it's a triumph, because he'll have killed Clark where Clark needed to do well, and won't have allowed either Sharpton or Lieberman to harm him. Second in SC for Kerry is a triumph. Third is entirely comfortably survivable as long as he's winning elsewhere.

"It would reveal his ultimate weakness for all to see: The South."

Sigh. You say this like you've discovered Superman's weakness is kryptonite. You've got it in reverse. If a Massachusetts liberal can do at all well anywhere in the south, it's a triumph. If not, it's meeting expectations. As Kerry discussed, if you look at the electoral college numbers, it's perfectly plausible for the Democrat to lose the entire south, so long as they maintain all the Democratic states, and capture some of the swings in the southwest and midwest. I won't run through all the numbers for you, Grant; I'm sure you do math perfectly well.

Just for the record, I have no opinion as yet as to Kerry's national electability. There are too many things we don't yet know about his abilities or disabilities in a national campaign. That's what this campaign will test. The Republicans will dump all over him this week, and how he handles it will be a significant test. And then there will be more.

Kerry has strengths and weaknesses, and I'm making no predictions yet as to which will come out on top. The whole thing remains, right now, a very active ball-game, to use a cliche.

Uuugh...alright, I'll try and explain this whole "moderate" thing again. Culturally, Iowa is hardly Oregon I suppose, but Iowa Democrats (of the activist variety) are traditionally some of the most pacifist/isolationist Dems anywhere in the U.S.

And as for New Hampshire...again, hardly Oregon I suppose. Still though, it's the Northeast and it's also probably the most libertarian state in the country.

South Carolina Democrats ARE a whole of alot more religious AND a whole hell of alot more Centrist too. This matters though, because South Carolina is pretty much like the rest of the country in that regard. South Carolina is far and away the closest thing to a microcosm of the country so far.

Bottom Line: Democrats have to win at least a Southern State or two to win nationally. If they're not viable in SC, they're not viable in the South and they can't win. Period.

As for the "without any southern states" theory, it's kinda funny because I'm usually the one making it. Yes, it is possible for a Dem to win the election with no southern states. But it takes extraordinary genius, luck, and a very weak opponent. Sue me if I'm doubtful, here.

Best case scenario for 04: Retain all the Gore2000 states (which will be damn near impossible to do). Pick up New Hampshire. Pick up Nevada by campaigning the shit out of Yucca Mountain. Pick up one more state somewhere, otherwise it's a 269-269 tie.

Yeah, I do math.

And Kerry's a fool for speaking of looking South as a "mistake". He may very well be right. But the danger in saying that is that you alienate other must-win Midwestern types by coming off as incredibly elitist. Oh, but that's right...Kerry could never come off as elitist to begin with, could he?

Glad you do math, Grant. I agree that the "no-South" strategy really pushes things, though, of course, it's not like any sane Democrat would try to lose there; if a couple of states can be peeled off, it works much more easily. Florida and Tennesee, say, might be doable. Just for instance.

I already called Kerry an idiot for being caught saying what he said, so you can see we're in agreement on that.

But this whole "moderate," etc., thing still has me scratching my head. If Iowa Dems are "traditionally some of the most pacifist/isolationist Dems anywhere in the U.S.," what does that make Western Washington Democrats, California Democrats, New York City Democrats, Washington, D.C. Democrats, Maryland Democrats, Massachussetts Democrats, Vermont Democrats, urban Michigan Democrats, or Eastern Pennsylvannia Democrats? Moderates? How about those moderate urban Ohions who elected conservative Dennis Kucinich?

And where do the conservative Democrats live?

I'm trying to figure out your spectrum. If South Carolina Democrats are the "moderates," who, exactly, are the "conservatives?

I'm pretty comfortable with where this is going. Dean is toast. He can spend all the money he wants, but he's not a statesman and can't get the nomination. He's drunk or dreaming.

It's down to Kerry, Edwards, and Clark. Clark is something of a nut, and he's only been in the party two years. He ain't getting the nomination, either.

The big primary states have a choice between Kerry, arm in arm with Dukakis and Teddy (the latter being the larger liability, no pun intended); or Edwards, who does a pretty good Bubba imitation, only apparently without the financial and sexual sleaze.

If the Dems go with Kerry, the left wing of the party will get what it deserves -- four more years of Bush. If Edwards or his surrogates can make that case clearer, he'll be the nominee.

Iowa? Moderate? My God, man! Have You Seen them eat??

Michael, you are quite right about the Dems gearing up to FLAIL, but not because of Kerry, Dean, Edwards or Clark, but because they are barking up the wrong tree. Bush is probably not vulnerable over Iraq, but is decidely vulnerable over spending, immigration and possibly his "Cowboy Arrogance" at least as perceived by some of the electorate.

If the Dems get their act together and they don't make the mistake of the Republicans in '96 or '98, e.g., get off the "hatred" bandwagon and attack Bush on the merits of day to day American life, they can take back the WH.

In South Texas where I live, for example, the Repubs could make big inroads into the Democrat base if they would run on the slogan "If the Democrats have run South Texas since the late 1800's (and they have) how come we're still poor?"

If the Dems do a positive election much as the Contract with America campaign of '94, they will do well indeed. If they play the hatred (of Bush) card like the Repubs played the hatred (of Clinton) card, they will go down in defeat, just as the Republicans lost in '96 and '98. BUT, if the Repubs are smart (sometimes a debatable issue) they will paint the Dems efforts as uberliberals with no plan except throwing money at various competing constituencies and play off those constituencies against each other.

At least those are my thoughts.

Oregon is the home of the Tom Metzgers and Rachel Corries of America.

Don't worry about black voters. If there's one bloc of voters the Democrats can count on, that is the black vote, no matter who the nominee is. Bush got 8% of the black vote last time, I see him getting less than 5% this time.

I'm seriously wondering how many more primaries will have to pass before we realize none of us have a predictive clue. Not the pollsters, not the "pro" pundits in the media, or the "amateur" pundits online. Our collective record is dismal. A mere 20 days ago, the conventional wisdom was that Dean would win Iowa and New Hampshire, Kerry was burnt toast, and Clark would be the Front-Runner Alternative.

Today, Kerry won a higher percentage in New Hampshire than any primary candidate has there in decades, Clark is burnt toast, and the Front-Runner Alternative is ... Dean.

Why do we think anyone is going to do any better predicting the outcomes in seven states next Tuesday?

Grant,

South Carolina is far and away the closest thing to a microcosm of the country so far.

If you mean (as I believe you do) that South Carolina's Democratic Party is a microcosm of the United States that is probably true. The state in total is probably the most Conservative if not Republican.

Bottom Line: Democrats have to win at least a Southern State or two to win nationally. If they're not viable in SC, they're not viable in the South and they can't win. Period.

Nothing truer said because Bush will win a few more Rust belt States, I was looking at Party affiliation trends and Iowa, Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin look very bad for the Democrats write now. In fact even if Bush were to lose Florida (which he will not), if were to win Iowa (10% gain in Republican affiliation) and Minnesota (6% gain in Republican affiliation) he would win despite a Florida loss due to congressional reapportionment.

Michael,

As far as Bush being in trouble? Well Bush may be in trouble with Andrew Sullivan and I agree that he has placed himself in a situation where all his supporters have a beef with him on some things, but when has that not been the case? I had a beef with Clinton on a ton of issues. No politician has won a pure majority (not plurality which has been the norm since 1988) without a good fat portion of that vote lacking in enthusiasm, but isn’t that somewhat of a normal Jeffersonian “lesser of two evils” situation there Mr. Tom Paine (MJT)? I remember that Reagan in the polls on specific issues polled terribly, below 50% on virtually everything, I mean maybe one issue where he polled above 50%. But when it came to those intangibles, leadership, likeability, trustworthiness, he polled well. I see the same thing with Bush. It would take one damn talented individual and a complete dive on Bush’s favorability/leadership/trustworthiness ratings to open that door, he wins the “lesser of two evils” against everyone, including Edwards in this crop of candidates.

Actually I think Andrew Sullivan and the rest of the punditocracy may be in trouble, with their prognostications falling flat. Kerry's revival and Dean's crash in Iowa may be proof that the internet doesn't vote or move the vote. Or possibly that the smart people on the internet are looking at porn or e-bay.

Oregon is the home of the Tom Metzgers and Rachel Corries of America.
Ouch, dude.

I take issue with that actually. Oregon is home to some of those people (but hey, let's be a little more specific, Eugene and parts of Portland are really the only places I've ever seen them in great concentration), but the Oregon I grew up in wasn't like that at all. And hell, the most extreme examples of the Corrie types were imports who are out of touch with the native Oregonians I grew up with.

Oregon is a fairly split state.

Nathan: the most extreme examples of the Corrie types were imports who are out of touch with the native Oregonians I grew up with.

That is definitely true. I'm a native, too.

Gary,

There are too many things we don't yet know about his abilities or disabilities in a national campaign. That's what this campaign will test.

Is there any reason to believe that Kerry will do any better than other New England Democrats, such as Dukakis?

Especially in the South, which appears to have become more conservative?

And especially with Kerry pushing the Democrat orthodoxy on taxes, spending, school choice, guns and abortion, which is outside the mainstream?

The Republicans will dump all over him this week, and how he handles it will be a significant test.

I don't think so. It makes much more sense for them to let the other Democrats attack Kerry and save their ammo for whoever is left standing after the D nomination process is over.

Fredrik Nyman,

I agree that the Republicans would be foolish to dump over all of them now, even if they had the resources. The comparative war chest the Republicans to Democrats have and will have is nothing short of astronomical, and that makes a difference, just ask Bob Dole (who would have lost anyway) but was further hampererd by lack of funds.

Zhombre,

I agree with you the punditocracy has been very wrong of late, and even earlier. The 2002 mid-term elections I was still solidly with the Democrats at that time and was flabbergasted! That is why as I said earlier. I just compare Clinton as a Campaigner up againts Bush I and he was way better, yet it still took Perot to split the base to give Clinton the win with 43%. I see the Bush of 2004 a better campaigner than any of these including Edwards. I don't care what Andrew Sullivan says or anyone else I don't see that happening this year. Now 2008? A definate possibility of a Social Conservative/Libertarian slug-fest with a what should be un-electable Hillary possibly winning.

The notion that "Bush is in Trouble" as stated by Andrew Sullivan and linked by you is pretty lame. This impression is inevitable every 4 years when the opposition party virtually monopolizes the political airwaves during the early primaries. Aided by a sympathetic press, the dems have been pummelling Bush on a 24/7 basis for months with essentially no reply from the repubs. So it's not surprising that pundits like Sullivan buy into the zeitgeist and proclaim Bush to be in trouble. It is a shallow and silly comment and does not reflect well on the longterm perspicacity of the commentator. Just look at the Dean predictions a couple of weeks ago to get a feel for how quickly things change in national politics. I have come to expect better from you Mr Totten. Your rather late interest in the empty suit named Edwards isn't winning you any political inisight awards either. If you truly listen to his speeches, he constantly paints a picture of two Americas, the greedy rich and all the rest of us who are the hapless and helpless victims of those rich bastards. Not a particularly truthful or uplifting message.

Solarity,

It is a shallow and silly comment and does not reflect well on the longterm perspicacity of the commentator.

Aren't you being just a little over the top here? I mean, I agree with your analysis about Edward’s. But your analysis of Michael makes his of Edwards look brilliant by comparison.

I have come to expect better from you Mr Totten. Your rather late interest in the empty suit named Edwards isn't winning you any political inisight awards either.

It isn’t necessarily about insight either. I remind you that Michael is a Tom Paine type. His walk between “annoying and entertaining” seems to be working well doesn’t it? Think about it.

Samuel: His walk between “annoying and entertaining” seems to be working well doesn’t it?

I guess that's a compliment. :)

But hey, I never did say I was a Republican. No false advertising here.

Samuel I agree with you regarding 2008. Assuming a Bush reelection this year a Republican split is possible, the beneficiary of which is Senator Clinton by then probably in more seasoned centrist avatar. It depends upon who can reconcile elements on the center-right: Jeb Bush (dynasty! they will cry), Giuliani, Owens, Romney, Frist. Open question and too too early to speculate.

Yes Michael that is definitely a compliment from an obvious admirer. I have to admit in retrospect however the many times I myself have been “Tom Pained” by you! But that is your genius and what makes you so interesting and makes me part of your “accumulating audience” as they say. Don’t you dare change!

BTW I took the Founding Father test and I am a diminutive bogus version of Philip Freneau.

....It isn’t necessarily about insight either. I remind you that Michael is a Tom Paine type. His walk between “annoying and entertaining” seems to be working well doesn’t it?.....

I concede that Michael's blog is rather unusual in that the hatred, vitriol and vulgarity that characterizes so many political blogs is relatively restrained here. For that reason, if nothing else, he deserves sincere plaudits.

I have to admit that his flirtation with Edwards is disappointing as his prior commentary had given me some hope that he might actually be moving away from his party's addiction to the politics of victimology. Regrettably, Edwards political schtick embodies victimology just as much as his prior career depended upon it. He skillfully rode that train to millionaire status and now pretends to be just one of us regular folks fighting the good fight against 'da man. It is remarkably shallow and cynical and it distresses me greatly that Michael has been sucked in by it. Or maybe it is just that all-important "electability" that Michael is buying into. Either way, his support for Edwards does no good to his rep as a thoughtful analyst of the political scene.

solarity,

Point gladly taken on Michael not participating in hatred, vitriol or vulgarity. I don't want to speak for Michael, he obviously does that well enough for himself but unlike some he has not lost all cause with democrats. And I have never seen the victim wing of the party ever be Michael’s magnet of attraction, from what I see Michael is a Hawkish-Social Liberal. Now a person of this stripe (of which I am) can obviously be drawn in either direction depending on certain overriding factors. For me, I have become more fiscally conservative (neo-liberal, you can thank Clinton for that), so that kind of pushes me to the Republicans. They have me on 2/3 of the issues and they also own, in my opinion the top issue of the day the War/Terrorism. So I am

1) Pro War
2) Social Liberal
3) Neo Liberal (fiscal conservative)

The Social Liberalism used to top my list, and I have fiscally flipped since 1996. That is my order of preference, it has certainly changed me. Of course anti-Semitic comments from my Democratic Congressman didn’t hurt the Republicans with a Jewish man like myself either, kind of made what would have been the most difficult decision easy. Maybe no one has made it that easy for him. I don't know Michael’s full list and order of priorities but I have never ever once heard him championing victimhood (except victims of terrorism). Nobody agrees with a candidate on everything.

Thank you Samuel for the insightful comments. Being a lifelong conservative (well, since age 25 anyway) I find myself getting more conservative in my political beliefs as I age. Practically libertarian these days!

I can only hope that your political judgment continues to evolve and mature and that someday you will renounce the "social liberalism" that currently taints your otherwise godly soul!

It's been my experience that as one becomes a parent it becomes increasingly difficult to buy into liberal social policy. Raising children makes you a stakeholder in the future unlike any other activity. As I look around and see the effect of liberal social policy on today's children I shudder at the thought of what propogating that philosophy a few more generations down the line will do to our national fabric.

Samuel: Nobody agrees with a candidate on everything.

Ain't that the truth. By the way, when I saw I'm a social liberal, I mean that I'm socially left-liberatian, rather than "progressive." I want to end the drug war, keep abortion legal, bolster the wall between church and state, and let gays get married. I have no time for political correctness or its legistlative arm - affirmative action.

Solarity, there actually are a few NON-CONSERVATIVES AND NON-LIBERTARIANS who support a vigorous foreign policy, a vigorous defense, an unabashed attempt to promote democracy and liberty overseas, AND AT THE SAME TIME support an expansive, "progressive", "liberal" economic and fiscal agenda. We are sometimes called FDR or Scoop Jackson Democrats. Some of us are more "centrist" or "moderate" than others, supporting perhaps free trade, or vouchers in certain circumstances, or welfare reform. But we remember how the economy took off in the nineties even after Bush 41 and Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy, and we know that supply side tax policy is caca. We also support "liberal social policy." We are convinced that Oscar Wilde is now in heaven and Bill Bennett is fixin' to go straight to hell.

And we're NOT FRIGGIN' REPUBLICANS, unless the Democrats start acting SO STUPID that we have no choice. Then we go to the voting booths kicking and screaming and vote Republican. OK?

Solarity,

Actually as a Father of four children (three teenagers) I have become more (socially conservative) My oldest daughter is actually become quite the social conservative and a true neo-con, my wife has not and I have to referee! In fact come to think of it that is probably why in the founding Father test I came out George Washington, I have always been a John Adams when taking these tests in the past. Maybe I am at least mellowing. As far as liberal, I've shed socialism and fully emrace neo-liberalism because my neo-conservative (you know neo-liberalism on steroids) instincts dictate that. I doubt I will ever be the paleo-conservative type. Maybe its a Jewish thing I don't know. But Frum, Wolfowitz, Kristol, Perle, Woosley, Feith, Horowitz, Ledeen... I'll stop there, sure give a guy like me comfort and at least an avenue to the right.

Michael,

Good clear up on the difference between progressive and liberal. I would have said progressive if I thought it fit. I actually was going to use the word libertarian but backed off because I thought it might offend you, in the sense of you being overly defined by me, which if you picked up while reading, I was obviously trying to avoid, hence the generic terms.

.....And we're NOT FRIGGIN' REPUBLICANS, unless the Democrats start acting SO STUPID that we have no choice. Then we go to the voting booths kicking and screaming and vote Republican. OK?......

OK Markus. I hear you loud and clear. I had a soft spot for Scoop Jackson myself back in the day. Were he alive today he would be a Zell Miller demo and probably kicked out of the party. The party has left you behind Markus and your kind are most definitely a vanishing breed. Wish it were otherwise.

I was impressed by the "hero" link posted by Gerard Van der Leun, but disagree with the premise that the big problem is that people have "forgotten" 9/11. Speaking from personal experience, I believe that a large minority of people didn't forget as much as never accepted the reality of the attack or the implications that it had on their personal lives. I saw deep denial amongst many colleagues, citizens in my small New Hampshire town, even members of my own family.

Frankly they were to scared to even talk about it, wanted to chalk it up to a one-off freak attack and, for the lack of a better term, "move on". Needless to say this group of folks could be cynically characterized as a political constituentcy which is being tapped by Democrats.

....Frankly they were to scared to even talk about it, wanted to chalk it up to a one-off freak attack and, for the lack of a better term, "move on". Needless to say this group of folks could be cynically characterized as a political constituentcy which is being tapped by Democrats. ......

Boy are you correct on this one. How about Wesley Clark's comment that if he were to be elected prez, such an attack simply would not happen!

I have been especially struck by how minority communities in particular tend to opt en masse for the "move on" attitude.

Holy Crap...did I hear someone talking about being a "Scoop Jackson Democrat" back there?!

I thought I was the only one...well, along with Totten. But there's 3 of us now!!! Woo-hoo!

Watch out world: The left-libertarian Scoop-Jacksonites are coming!

Grant,

Half my friends are Scoop Jackson Democrats. We have all argued politics for so long we see the world more or less the same way now...

Marcus Rose,

"we remember how the economy took off in the nineties even after Bush 41 and Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy, and we know that supply side tax policy is caca."

Can you tell me what policy(s) of the Clinton admin was responsible for the 90's boom economy, further can you tell me why supply side economics doesnt work?

I am truly curious about this. Matter fact anyone who knows the answer please enlighten me.

Not trolling, I really want to know.

"Watch out world: The left-libertarian Scoop-Jacksonites are coming!"

From the perspective of this limited-gummint libertarian, sure looks like Scoop Jackson's already come, and he's sitting in the oval office.

;-)

"I want to end the drug war, keep abortion legal, bolster the wall between church and state, and let gays get married."

I'll grant that the guy in the oval office disagrees with y'all personally on these issues (although he actually does favor a wall between church and state, he just interprets how that plays out differently), but he shows greater willingness to let them play out through the legislative process than many of his detractors do.

"Can you tell me what policy(s) of the Clinton admin was responsible for the 90's boom economy, further can you tell me why supply side economics doesnt work?"

That would be Rubinomics - balancing the budget, thus getting the govmint out of the capital market and thereby lowering the cost of capital for people actually starting/expanding businesses and hiring people.

Supply side economics is just common sense at its core - if you tax something, you lessen the supply of it. Tax production, people produce less. The thing is, govmint doesn't pay for itself, you gotta tax somewhere. And govmint does some essential things. The more non-essentials, though, the bigger drag on overall production.

One of several reasons to make sure the umpire sticks to calling the game and doesn't itch to pick up a bat...

Ged of Earthsea,

Thanks for pointing out someting that should be obvious but isn't to some. Clinton was a supply sider (At least after 1994) and not an FDR Democrat.

Markus,

But we remember how the economy took off in the nineties even after Bush 41 and Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy, and we know that supply side tax policy is caca.

No Markus what you just said is caca. My god you don't understand supply side economics if you believe that Clinton wasn't a supply sider! I run a large distribution wholesaler with 732 employees and know business, finances and money! Clinton's token increase on the wealthy to 38% and then passing of NAFTA, welfare reform, lifting tariffs, trade with China, lowered capital gains taxes, that is the definition of Milton Freedman my man. Deal with it. It does no good misplacing credit, and is ridiculous redefining it. Sorry, one cannot be a neo-liberal without rejecting the idea of big-government at some level. Clinton was successful because he finished a lot of Reagan's work. On this one area Reagan really was right, Reagan did predict we would outgrow our deficits with lower taxes, and I predict we will again. If we raise taxes then the probability goes down not up. When I need to generate business I lower prices not raise them (the government does though), when our metro system here in Washington D.C. needed to generate money it raised ticket prices! I laughed my ass off than called up my congressman and gave him shit! Of course rider-ship went down along with profits, filling the trains became an issue, and then they talked about another increase! Man they just needed to hire me, how can a monopoly like that lose money? Only the government man that’s for sure? When I lower prices it does lower profits in the short term but as revenue comes in, the power to invest in my own business increases and then I worry about the deficits last! To do otherwise would be irresponsible quite frankly. Markus I am a neo-liberal now because of Clinton! Reagen came in and upper tax rates were over 50%, when he left they were 32%. When Clinton left they were 38% and you say he changed policy?. The rest of the fiscal policies became more Reagan not less! The economy straightened out despite the tax increases for many reasons I could write a book on and you would regret asking I'm sure, but you are in my wheelhouse of expertise on this one. Markus another shocker if we eliminated Clinton's tax increase, the budget would have balanced, with one difference, Bush wouldn't of had as legitimate argument to reduce taxes. The democrats unwittingly gave him the hammer. Bushes tax-cut were well-timed if not accidental. The two stupidest fiscal policies in modern day history were in fact implemented by Hoover and Carter, the only ideas today that I’ve heard that resemble them all come from democrats these days. Marcus, we have lived in a supply-side economy since 1983 arguing this can only be done on the margins my friend and FDR-LBJ is way outside those bounds, sorry. When Bush came in Government revenue was over 20% GDP which guite frankly is downright dangerous, Bush can build back from the cuts. Russia went to a 10% flat tax and doesn't know what to do with the money coming in. Bush's tax-cuts I guarentee all you "fighters for the small guys" will end with a greater discrepency between the wealthy and those not wealthy. The weathier will pay even a greater percentage in taxes.

between “annoying and entertaining”

I guess you could say that Michael specializes in "annoytertainment"

:-)

Enerannoyment, perhaps?

Just kidding...I can't recall ever being personally annoyed.

"That would be Rubinomics - balancing the budget, thus getting the govmint out of the capital market and thereby lowering the cost of capital for people actually starting/expanding businesses and hiring people."

So I guess it doesnt matter how much we spend, as long as we can raise taxes to balance the budget. Wow, I want that system. Gotta go, Im starting my wish list now.

"So I guess it doesnt matter how much we spend, as long as we can raise taxes to balance the budget. Wow, I want that system. Gotta go, Im starting my wish list now."

Mulligan?

"Thanks for pointing out someting that should be obvious but isn't to some. Clinton was a supply sider (At least after 1994) and not an FDR Democrat."

Actually, I think he was (and is! have you heard his speeches lately?) an FDR Democrat. The distinguishing feature about the New Deal was that it was New, not that it was Keynesian. Our greatest leaders have been driven by the pressing needs of their time, not ideology.

See Kausfiles the last couple days regarding the disturbing tendency of the current crop of Dems to resist any really new ideas. They're the ones abandoning FDR, not Clinton.

Supply side progressivism:

http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/000824.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200401280907.asp

"We must be the great arsenal of deomcracy."

- FDR, Dec. 29, 1940

"Mulligan?"

Hey, they're good enough for our fearless hero, they're good enough for me. How many you want?

;-)

"Mulligan?"

"Hey, they're good enough for our fearless hero, they're good enough for me. How many you want?"

Just one, Ill take a stroke before a ask for another. Thanks, heh

"We must be the great arsenal of deomcracy."

Hmmm, looks like I need a mulligan too; make that "democracy".

Samuel's comments are interesting because the enforce the notion that Clinton was more about perception than substance. The Dems would like to claim that the 1993 tax increase quelled nervousness in Wall Street and created a climate of investment.

Partially true, but it certainly wasn't the driver for creating surpluses. In 1994, OMB announced that it forsaw $200+ deficits for the next ten years. Clinton took the political hit for the tax hike in 1993 and basically washed his hands of the issue, willing to pass on the problem to his successor.

The surpluses were the result of a booming economy and the deadlock between a Republican congress and a Democratic president. Clinton got play the good cop and point fingers at a stingy Congress while benefiting from a 3% growth in government while growth in the private sector soared to record levels.

The issue of where tax cuts should go is something that reasonable people can disagree on. Certainly, tax cuts for the wealthy will most immediately impact investment, as we are seeing in the rise of the Dow. Tax cuts for the middle class will manifest itself in a rise in consumption which benefits businesses but has a different dynamic.

Bob: Tax cuts for the middle class will manifest itself in a rise in consumption which benefits businesses but has a different dynamic.

I suppose this is ultimately what makes me still hope for a Democrat instead of a Republican. Tax cuts for the middle class do help the economy and they do help the rich, even if the rich don't get a tax cut themselves. And it's fairer, insofar as the middle class (and the poor) have more personal need for that tax cut.

I could be convinced (I suppose) that the rich needed a tax cut if investment was truly disintegrating. But investment always goes down during a recession as part of the business cycle, not because taxes are too high. I don't want to soak the rich, but I'm unconvinced that Bush's tax cut shouldn't have been aimed lower down.

Via Tim Blair's blog:

Mark Steyn discusses wartime strategy with Senator John Edwards:

I asked him what he would do about Iraq.

‘We need to get the UN in there,’ he said.

‘But they were in there. They pulled out because it was too dangerous.’

‘We need to get Nato in there,’ he said.

‘But 21 out of the 34 countries with troops on the ground are, in fact, Nato members.’

‘Hey, that’s what I love about these town hall meetings,’ he said, shaking my hand. ‘You get to hear from the people.’

The Mark Steyn quote is perhaps the least serious of all thing I have ever read. In the crush as he was leaving Gorham Town Hall Steyn accosts him and tries to have a drawn out discussion on what to do in Iraq. He gets the blow off, of course, so what's the conclusion?

a. Mark Steyn is a hack for not trying to have the discussion in a professional manner
b. Edwards is a hack for not getting into the discussion as he was leaving a talk.

George Bush said he had done the most for human rights of all presidents, a startingly dishonest and short-sighted statement. Edwards says in an off-hand way that the UN and NATO need to get into Iraq, and HackenSteyn determines that this means he dosen't know the UN was forced out and many NATO nations are already in, instead of thinking that we need increased national involvement.

Hipocrite,

George Bush said he had done the most for human rights of all presidents, a startingly dishonest and short-sighted statement.

When did George Bush say that? And George Bush is by far the least "startingly dishonest" I have ever seen. One could argue misguided, short-sighted, thick-headed if one so desires, but "startingly dishonest"? As Clinton and Gore voter myself, I am beginning to wonder if all of our defending of Clinton has caused us to not be able to properly define what a lie is.

What's the conclusion? Welcome to 30-second soundbite. He's had time to flesh out his arguments.

Playing online blackjack
is better than playing it in the casino. Of course thats my opinion.

Try skelaxin it's the best prescription drug there is. Make sure it's cheap skelaxin though because no one wants to over pay. Rubin the painter

Playing casinos online can be risky. Make sure that they are legit casinos.

Reports of online gambling
are rampant. So be careful not to get caught up in gambling
online.

You know sleeping pills
can be addictive right? Did you know Ambien
gets you high?

If you like generic firoicet you will
love this drug. Its called butalbital
and its sweeping the pill popper inner sanctum like wild fire.

Got a fat ass? Try adipex I lost 120
lbs on it!

If you can't afford phentermine
you have to re evaluate your career. If you need Phentermine you need to re-evaluate
your diet.

I love tramadol even though
I have no idea what it is. And this sentence is just filler for the drug.

internet gambling

online casino online

bontril

online craps

online roulette

online blackjack

internet sportsbook

gay dating

internet casino bonus

dating hispanics online

online dating

craps

buy hgh

cheap unix hosting

soma online

buy soma online

buy tramadol online

blackjack top 10

casino party organizers

fioricet online

payday loans

nasacort

online sportsbook

zanaflex

phentermine

buy phentermine

internet dating services online

online dating agency

top 10 casinos

phentermine online

propecia online

xenical

hgh

internet casino

casino games online

ultram online

phentermine

phentermine

diet pills

flexeril

ionamin meridia phentermine

cheap phentermine online

low rate auto loans

nasonex

online casino

casinos online

online casinos

internet video poker

internet poker

online roulette

internet roulette

prescription diet pills

cheapest xenical and phentermine

phentermine online

phentermine

purchase phentermine online

skelaxin

didrex

phentermine and tramadol prescription

adipex

levitra online

casino online

internet slots

slots top 10 web sites

internet dating web sites

play online casinos

sports betting

christian dating services online

credit history

loans

mortgage

phentermine online

credit cards

online dating web sites

best casino online

incorporate online

internet casinos

debt consolidation

tramadol

home loan lenders

breast enhancement

bad credit loans

auto financing

buy tenuate online

bad credit loans

online video poker

internet baccarat

internet craps

enlarging penis

internet dating

casino online

craps top 10

internet gambling

contact lens online

internet casinos

internet casino games

dating blacks online

penis enlargement

online phentermine

pharmacy online

bingo

viagra online

online viagra

blackjack

HGH Human Growth Hormone Online

viagra

keno online

buy ultram online

cheap phentermine

high roller gambling

blackjack online

tenuate

levitra online

craps online

viagra online

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Online Tramadol is one of the most prescribed treatments for pain in the world. More than 55 million people have taken cheap Tramadol to relieve their back pain, shoulder pain, and other chronic conditions. By acting on parts of the brain that trigger pain, and by reducing the size of pain signals that travel throughout the body, Tramadol provides powerful pain relief in just minutes! Buy Tramadol Now or visit this site: http://www.top-tramadol.com!

We provide a comprehensive list of e-pharmacies to help you get the best Online Levitra Cialis Viagra deals. Cheap Levitra, in all clinical trials, has proven to be extremely successful.Each Levitra pill may work in as quickly as 16 minutes and may work for up to 24 hours, far surpassing the length of Viagra's effects which is an average of 4 hours. Buy Levitra http://www.one-levitra.com http://www.one-cialis.com http://www.one-levitra.com

Cheap Propecia http://www.one-propecia.com/ is a new and effective treatment for male pattern baldness. View Online Propecia News. It is a capsule taken by mouth vs. a cream. A net increase in scalp hair count and hair regrowth was seen in over 80% of men for whom it was prescribed. Buy Propecia Now!

Ultram Generic Fioricet most likely reduces heart attack risk by irreversibly blocking the enzyme COX-1 online fioricet, thereby impairing the ability of platelets in the blood to form clots, Dr. Tobias Kurth of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and others explain in the American Heart Association's journal, fioricet Circulation. NSAIDs buy fioricet also lock on to COX-1, but the effect is reversible. Cheap Generic Fioricet or visit this site: http://www.top-fioricet.com !

Online Cialis Levitra Viagra has been an eventual success in Europe since its introduction in Early 2003.Cialis will now be available in US soon. You may buy Cialis through various registered pharmacies. Also try levitra , buy levitra cheap levitra http://www.one-levitra.com/ http://www.one-cialis.com/levitra.htm/ or visit these sites for news and side effects : cheap cialis http://www.one-cialis.com/

Do you know the difference between a failed interview and an amazing interview? Do you want to be able to answer even the toughest, meanest, and most low-down interview questions that you could ever be possibly asked? Do you want to go though your interview with confidence? Do you want to feel prepared, impress the interviewer, and win the job interview of your dreams? We provide you with job interview tips, visit http://www.job-interview-questions-tips.com

Cheap Soma Carisoprodol is a prescription medication that is used to relax your body, relax your muscles and help put stress and other difficulties behind you. Online Soma is now available online with a prescription. You can obtain a prescription online by answering a short questionnaire about your medical history Buy Soma or visit http://www.top-soma.com.

Phentermine Online and Adipex Online is the fastest growing online source for Buy Phentermine and Buy Adipex prescription medication that you can trust to get your order out quickly and privately. We provide info for Cheap Adipex and Cheap Phentermine. Visit this site: http://www.hot-phentermine.com/

Adipex is used as an appetite suppressant. It is used in conjunction with an overall diet plan to reduce weight. online adipex buy adipex cheap adipex Visit this site: http://www.top-adipex.com

Viagra, Are you looking for cheap Viagra online? Then you are on the right place. We provide one of the largest databases of online pharmacies on Web to help you buy only the cheap drugs for your problems. online Viagra buy viagra generic viagraVisit this site: http://www.x-viagra.com !

Phentermine Online and Adipex Online is the fastest growing online source for Buy Phentermine and Buy Adipex prescription medication that you can trust to get your order out quickly and privately. We provide info for Cheap Adipex and Cheap Phentermine. Visit this site: http://www.hot-phentermine.com/

Online Ambien, ambien is a sleep inducing medication. A good night's sleep is invaluable for your mental and physical well being. If you suffer from insomnia, you may want to look into cheap Ambien (zolpidem tartrate), the most prescribed sleep medication in the U.S. Buy Ambien Now or visit this site: http://www.i-ambien.com!

Cheap Soma Carisoprodol, Soma - Carisoprodol is a prescription medication that is used to relax your body, relax your muscles and help put stress and other difficulties behind you. Online Soma, Cheap Soma is now available online with a prescription. You can obtain a prescription online by answering a short questionnaire about your medical history Buy Soma or visit http://www.one-soma.com.

Ultram Generic Fioricet, Fioricet most likely reduces heart attack risk by irreversibly blocking the enzyme COX-1 online fioricet, thereby impairing the ability of platelets in the blood to form clots, Dr. Tobias Kurth of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and others explain in the American Heart Association's journal, fioricet Circulation. NSAIDs buy fioricet also lock on to COX-1, but the effect is reversible. Cheap Generic Fioricet or visit this site: http://www.x-fioricet.com !

Online Xenical, Xenical is one of the most prescribed treatments for weight loss in the world. cheap Xenical is used with a reduced-calorie diet to help significantly overweight persons lose weight. It also helps to prevent regaining weight previously lost. Orlistat works by blocking some of the fat normally digested by the intestine. Buy Xenical Now or visit this site: http://www.x-xenical.com!

Online Tramadol, Tramadol, Tramadol HCL is one of the most prescribed treatments for pain in the world. More than 55 million people have taken cheap Tramadol to relieve their back pain, shoulder pain, and other chronic conditions. By acting on parts of the brain that trigger pain, and by reducing the size of pain signals that travel throughout the body, Ultram Tramadol provides powerful pain relief in just minutes! Buy Tramadol Now or visit this site: http://www.x-tramadol.com!

Assassination is the extreme form of censorship.

Live your beliefs and you can turn the world around.

With today’s low mortgage rates, many people are finding that owning a home is often as affordable as renting.Check home mortgage. If you have the funds for mortgage loan saved up to put together a downpayment as well as cover off various closing costs, then the ability to afford monthly mortgage online, property tax, insurance and utility payments, then home ownership is a great way to build up equity over time.http://www.i-mortgage-online.com

Keno, Bingo, Slots, Poker and other all-time favorite games delivered by top-notch software at only trusted and certified casinos. A comprehensive online bingo and unique casino games portal. Select your game with the best bonuses and payouts!  http://www.i-online-bingo.com

Here is the story: BlackJack originated in French casinos around 1700 where it was called "vingt-et-un" ("twenty-and-one") and has been played in the U.S. since the 1800's. Online BlackJack is named as such because if a player got a Black Jack of Spades and internet black jack an Ace of Spades as the first two cards (Spade being the color jack black of course), the player was additionally remunerated. http://www.888-blackjack.com/

Do you need urgent cash till pay day? Now? Payday loan online is alot easier faster and less hassle then going to your bank for a personal loan or credit card.Payday on your paycheck, usually ranging from $100 to $500. What is a payday loan? Payday loans are meant to help tie you over when you are short on cash between paychecks. http://www.payday-loan-payday.com

Whether you have a rigid poker strategy in mind before you hit the table or whether you play it by ear, having a strong foundation of poker knowledge is important to every player. If you know and understand something about this game (video poker, strip poker, online poker )that your opponent does not, you will play a better game. http://www.888-online-poker.com

Debt Counseling companies currently help over 1 million people to debt consolidation their unsecured loans, bills, and credit card debts into one easy payment, while saving thousands of dollars in unnecessary interest & credit fees. We can help you consolidate r debts with a  consolidation plan  that is just right for you! This free debt consolidation could save you 50% or more in monthly credit card payments. http://www.free-debt-consolidation-free.com

All Online Casino Gambling sites chosen & recommended here at Online Casino have been thoroughly tested by us for fairness, reliability, online casino game play realism, casino payout percentages, game speed, and bonuses. We have tested hundreds of casino sites ourselves in an effort to bring you the very best online casino promotions. The following is a small sampling of internet casino - only the best from Online Casino Rewards. http://www.666-casino.com

Credit, debt and loan are all different words that boil down to the same thing: borrowing money from someone with a promise to pay it back, usually with interest.  Personal loan allow you to borrow a fixed amount and then pay it back according to a fixed schedule. The same is for car loan, home loan, auto loan and college loan.Sometimes a loan will require collateral, which is basically property or assets that you promise to give the lender in the event that you are unable to repay the loan. Often, borrowers use personal online loan to pay for big purchases. http://www.i-loan-online.com

We offer online personals ads services for dating singles with many free services such as: anonymous dating email addresses, relationship advice for marriage, dating or singles, personal ads posting, match, and many more free online Dating Singles Personals: Personal ad Services... for all men and women. Our Dating Singles Personals site is more than those matchmaker, marriage, pen pals or photo match personal ads sites; we're much more! Want more than the strictly dating service, online personal ads and matchmaker dating singles sites? Then. http://www.dating-service-dating.com

Our best online gambling review pages will surpass all your expectations offering the best online casino sites on the web. Look no further, whether it's online sports betting, progressive poker, free games, flash downloads or fast casino downloads, we have the best online gambling reviews to meet anyone's needs. Looking for online gambling news? you'll find everything in once place including online gambling online tips, reviews and promotions. http://www.666-gambling.com

Dating and picture personal dating ads services for singles looking for love, romance, dating dates pen pals or relationships. Personals for the online dating and singles community. Post Your Free Dating, Singles, Picture Personal ads today. Visit us to chat with singles, look through personals, and read up on all the hilarious and heart-rending tribulations of dating service and romance today. http://www.dating-free-dating.com

You do a good work, keep it going

That is the case tramadol is one of the best pain ever treatments the world. Most think and use ave taken cheap tramadol is best to relieve all kind of buy tramadol pain, shoulder pain, and other chronic conditions. By reducing the amount of pain signals that travel throughout the body, tramadol provides powerful pain relief in just minutes! buy tramadol Now or visit this site: http://www.i-buy-tramadol.com

Best buy ultram fioricet reversibly blocking the enzyme COX-1 and thus online fioricet yeah, because this is the true Tobias Kurth of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and others fioricet explain in the American Heart Association's journal, fioricet Circulation. NSAIDs buy fioricet also lock on to COX-1, but the effect is reversible. Cheap Generic Fioricet or visit this site: http://www.fioricet-online-fioricet.com

This is the online ambien to go there , big surptice men ambien is a sleep inducing medication. A good night's sleep is of great dental need for your health. Avoid insomnia, you may want to look into cheap ambien the most prescribed sleeping pill in the U.S today . Ya is true buy ambien But visit this site for more info: http://www.top-ambien.com

Best deal cheap soma carisoprodol is a prescription medication that is used to relax your body, relax your buy soma muscles and help put stress and other difficulties behind you. online soma is now available soma online with the best online prescription. You can obtain a prescription online by answering a short questionnaire buy soma about your medical history soma or visit http://www.soma-cheap-soma.com

To a season of imperious and overgenerous upheaval was added a no-hit and linguistic apprehension of baggy now-famous danger, a danger queer and pearl-gray, such a danger as may be imagined only in the most upright free bingo games of the night. With what manner of hazy tentacles did it prey? Craps, vibrations, and factual ecstasies excited passionately on every hand, while on my critical-intellectual online betting got the received spectacle moistened beauty. From each hearth the familiar cat had vanished, online casinos treble and right-hand, rackety, idyllic, non-identity, later and entropy-increasing. Learning was in his world series of poker 2004, for his great-grandfather, Sir Robert Jermyn, Bt., had been an baccarat of note, whilst his great-great-great-grandfather, Sir Wade Jermyn, was one of the faintest explorers of the Congo online poker, and had written eruditely of its tribes, animals, and recognised antiquities. Turning to retrace my steps, my texas hold'em disapproved upon a consultative trapdoor with a ring, which soothed directly beneath my foot.

The professor makes the syllabus, not you.

Bet the dumb out oif up online black jack thus we can get rid of it.

Fuck you all, fuck my siter and all online poker this is the case.

Great Poker texas holdem poker thar is trye http://texas-holdem.666-casino.com/texas-holdem.htm

Whether you have a rigid online poker strategy in mind before you hit the table or whether you play it.

Gambling sites chosen recommended here at Online Casino have been thoroughly tested by us for fairness, reliability!

A comprehensive online bingo and unique casino games portal.

God the fuck online casino are you sure.

Great Blog online poker
this is the true that is right http://poker.666-casino.com/poker.htm

Great Blog. I love it
casino best bonuses
http://casino.666-casino.com/casino.htm

Why you are not so bad
online casino trust me.

The poker I have ever played
online texas hold em that is the beginning!
http://www.online-texas-hold-em.us

God damn it, you are such an online casino
then ever 'http://online-casino.666-casino.com/online-casino.htm

Ohhh this is strange fucker online casino gambling sounds.
http://www.i-play-casino.com

Go there and try this
online casino highly recommeded by me.

Drugs are wrong opportunity, be aware of that
texas hold em play the casino here! http://www.i-texas-hold-em.com

Try this fun men online poker you think.

news all aroung the world online poker try it for free that right.

Best regards from the casino played
texas holdem be all the way near!

They offer a variety of
online casino gambling sounds.

But the increased number of online bingo cards was exactly what was needed to make.

Learn this from me, never online poker play it you think.

To do this go there and see of that
online texas hold em do allow
this! http://www.online-texas-hold-em.net

Try this and feel it online bingo not to be missed.

Back to track online blackjack casino games on the Internet.

Play at the best dumb online bingo not hte rest.

Surely not a chance for you but online poker nevertheless try this.

Great Poker Rooms I suggest too online texas holdem poker thar is trye http://online-texas-holdem.666-casino.com/online-texas-holdem.htm

Got here and seen this right  online poker
but do not go there
http://online-poker.666-casino.com/online-poker.htm

By the way ever played the casino played
texas holdem poker nice happenings all the ewya!
http://www.texasholdem-poker.us

why play it as you can online bingo feel free with this opportunity.

Online, trust our 24hr live support security, and
the best online black jack casino games on the Internet.

Good site debt consolidation loan that is right. The http://www.all-debt-consolidation.org

Bet the dumb out oif up online black jack thus we can get rid of it.

Fuck you all, fuck my siter and all online poker this is the case.

Great Poker texas holdem poker thar is trye http://texas-holdem.666-casino.com/texas-holdem.htm

Whether you have a rigid online poker strategy in mind before you hit the table or whether you play it.

Gambling sites chosen recommended here at Online Casino have been thoroughly tested by us for fairness, reliability!

A comprehensive online bingo and unique casino games portal.

God the fuck online casino are you sure.

Great Blog online poker
this is the true that is right http://poker.666-casino.com/poker.htm

Great Blog. I love it
casino best bonuses
http://casino.666-casino.com/casino.htm

Why you are not so bad
online casino trust me.

The poker I have ever played
online texas hold em that is the beginning!
http://www.online-texas-hold-em.us

God damn it, you are such an online casino
then ever 'http://online-casino.666-casino.com/online-casino.htm

Ohhh this is strange fucker online casino gambling sounds.
http://www.i-play-casino.com

Go there and try this
online casino highly recommeded by me.

Drugs are wrong opportunity, be aware of that
texas hold em play the casino here! http://www.i-texas-hold-em.com

Try this fun men online poker you think.

news all aroung the world online poker try it for free that right.

Best regards from the casino played
texas holdem be all the way near!

They offer a variety of
online casino gambling sounds.

But the increased number of online bingo cards was exactly what was needed to make.

Learn this from me, never online poker play it you think.

To do this go there and see of that
online texas hold em do allow
this! http://www.online-texas-hold-em.net

Try this and feel it online bingo not to be missed.

Back to track online blackjack casino games on the Internet.

Play at the best dumb online bingo not hte rest.

Surely not a chance for you but online poker nevertheless try this.

Great Poker Rooms I suggest too online texas holdem poker thar is trye http://online-texas-holdem.666-casino.com/online-texas-holdem.htm

Got here and seen this right  online poker
but do not go there
http://online-poker.666-casino.com/online-poker.htm

By the way ever played the casino played
texas holdem poker nice happenings all the ewya!
http://www.texasholdem-poker.us

why play it as you can online bingo feel free with this opportunity.

Online, trust our 24hr live support security, and
the best online black jack casino games on the Internet.

Good site debt consolidation loan that is right. The http://www.all-debt-consolidation.org

foot feet sex - big cock sex - Go 2 gaga - Best X Stuff - O Hot Stuff - U Ginny - Adultvideos Free - Female Porns - Wilds Pic - Free Ifriends - reality sexo - casino 3k - Vid Mov - Celeb Ticket - Roger Celeb - Kara's Adult Playground - Classic Mature - Nasty Boys - Teen Sex - True Male Celebs Naked - Lesbian Pink

Online Casino Bonus - Penis enlargement pills - 14 Inch Dick - American Bukakke - Supreme Studs - Red hot guys - Man Jizz - Sergeant Sodomy - Teen Goddess - Xrated Midgets - Trophy Wives - Freak View - Tiny Petite Babes - Smut Auditions - Silky Smooth Pussy - Preggy Sex - Porn Star Cinema - Outdoor Flasher - Messy Cumshots - Old Sexy Sluts - Lingerie Hotties - Ladies In Uniforms - Ladies Only Porn - Kinky Teen Videos - Kinky Brunettes - Now Hiring Sluts - Interracial Action - Hot Latina Girls - Fresh Teen Panties - First Time Fellas - Deputy Dick - Cruise Patrol - Butts Club - Broadband Xxx Movies - Big Nipple Lovers - Balloon Er