October 13, 2003

The Libertarian Temptation

When I first met my wife Shelly she said she had “libertarian curiosities.” Noooooooo, I thought to myself. I had been there. I had done that. And I said so.

Back in the early 1990s I joined the Libertarian Party. I didn’t know much about it at the time, but I did know they favored freedom more than anything else. It helped that they were different from the Democrats and Republicans. 1960s left-overs were unappealing then as now. And the 1992 Republican convention in Houston, where Pat Buchanan declared a “culture war” on America - with the nightmarish Pat Robertson by his side - was enough to keep me out of the GOP for a long long time.

I was put on the Libertarian mailing list. It turned me off pretty fast.

They wanted to legalize dope. Fine, fine, I’m still fine with that. They also wanted to abolish the IRS. They wanted to privatize the roads and set up toll booths to pay for it. (Any idea how much the tolls would cost each time?) They wanted to quadruple my college tuition by yanking subsidies from universities. They would have ruined me.

So back to the Democrats I went, convinced that Libertarians were a crazy-ass cult of liberals seduced by right-wing loopiness.

Since then a lot more people have joined them. They haven’t joined the Party, necessarily, but they do call themselves libertarians. They are small-l libertarians, not the goofballs I knew.

Thank goodness for that saving small-l. It mellows them. And now their ideas are spreading.

Matt Welch has a new piece in Reason about a young libertarian leader in France.

Sabine Herold, to put it mildly, is not your typical Frog. Herold, the 22-year-old leader of Liberté, J’ecris Ton Nom (Freedom, I Write Your Name), has in the last few months emerged as the massively popular and highly photogenic leader of -- zut! -- a burgeoning pro-market, pro-American counterculture in France. Earning comparisons to Joan of Arc, Brigitte Bardot (!), and Margaret Thatcher in the panting British press, she represents something French politics hasn’t seen in years: a public figure eager to take on the country’s endlessly striking unions.
My mother’s second husband gets tremendous rewards from his union. I’ll never be able to hate them. I owe, we all owe, tremendous thanks to the labor movement for bringing us weekends (as well as lots of other goodies), even if we aren't in a union ourselves. French unions, though. Hmm. They are to ours what the French Revolution was to the American Revolution. In other words, they are not my step-father’s unions. Go for it, Sabine. Take them on.
It is startling to hear any Parisienne, let alone a college student, drop references to F. A. Hayek in casual conversation, describe Communists as "disgusting," or lead pro-war demonstrations in front of the American Embassy. Herold is fond of issuing heretical statements guaranteed to make any good fonctionnaire’s skin crawl.
I must say that I like this woman. She doesn't seem to be one of the doofuses who sent me crazy mailings in the 90s.
"It’s annoying," Herold says, "because in France, we start striking, and then we go to negotiate. It would be so much more interesting to go negotiate first, and then if nothing happens, just go on strike. I don’t know, maybe it’s an old love of the Revolution, or that people missed World War II and they want to be in another kind of Resistance."
In other words, French unions should be more like American unions. And not be such poseurs. The French resistance is dead, along with its spirit.
"I think one of the big problems in France is that we are anti-American without knowing why," she says. "It’s just kind of a natural thing. I mean so many people I meet are anti-war, and they’ll just say that Bush is stupid and the Americans are awful imperialists. It’s just their typical answer, and they never think of why. That’s crazy. I think it’s because we’re all being brought up like that, especially at school. It’s incredible how we’re taught about America -- they’re always explaining, for example in geography or history courses, how Americans are imperialistic."
Indeed. The French think that we are what they used to be. It’s axiomatic for them. If it takes a libertarian to make them come to their senses, then that’s fine by me.

It’s not news to everyone but it is news to me that there are different kinds of libertarians, just as there are different kinds of lefties and righties. Reason magazine is a lot more…reasonable than I would have thought. As Matt Welch told me, their libertarianism is not an ideology. Rather, it is a way of looking at the world. Social liberalism plus a healthy respect for the market economy.

I've never been totally comfortable with the Democrats, but my frustration with them right now is higher than ever. I've been tempted many times to declare myself libertarian again. The folks at Reason are some of the smartest around, certainly preferable to the fossilized anachronisms at The Nation. They're also more refreshing than the crusty old conservatives at National Review, though NR does save itself with Victor Davis Hanson's brilliance and Jonah Goldberg's humor.

I've received a great deal of email from moderate libertarians inviting me over to their side. Join us, they say. We’re the centrist alternative you’ve been looking for.

Well, maybe. Sometimes. But not always. They have an isolationist streak that doesn’t work for me at all. They fight my beloved New Urbanism. And I still can’t get out of my head the stateless utopia of toll-booths.

I’m weary of ideology. I’m not in the market to buy one. So I will have to pass. But I’m glad the French are getting a whiff of this stuff. They need it. And its influence in America, though it sometimes can be extremist, is welcome.

My wife’s curiosities were more worth having than I realized three years ago. Libertarians matured while I wasn’t watching. So I take back what I said about them back then.

Posted by Michael J. Totten at October 13, 2003 11:34 PM
Comments

As a long time "l" libertarian (former L)-- wanting a maximum of human freedom and human responsibility, yet unsure what principles and political compromises most advance that goal, I advise you to attend some more meetings with real LP activists. Almost all are quite intelligent, distrustful of any authority. If you connect well with some, it could be fine for you.
Sigh. But the LP is also full of "purity police". Many, if not most, leading LPers are against the Iraq war -- for the right reason of the huge increase in US gov't power and the restrictions of freedom of US citizens, and the need to use ever more tax money, the costs. Which, for me and many other libbers, is NOT enough to balance the security benefits, and the humanitarian benefits, but at least is the reasonable cost-benefit analysis. See (Libertarian) Samizdata.net
http://samizdata.net/blog/

There's also the basic non-aggression axiom; you are free to act while not hurting others. Inside the LP there is a minority who believe that abortion violates this principle (Libertarians for Life); most LPers are strongly, even radically, pro-choice.

The pragmatic Lib position is: socially liberal (choice) and fiscally conservative (low tax). Anti-gov't, anti-authoritarian. Classical liberal.

Check out Britain and Hong Kong for Radio Frequency ID chips and variable road pricing, as a way of charging more for the roads in crowded (rush hour) times.

I remember two common critiques: 1) Libs are too radical; and 2) even if elected, a few Libs couldn't really do anything to change the system.
(I usually took this to mean the person didn't want to "waste their vote" on a third party). Both critiques are excellent, and contradictory: there's little chance of a few Libs getting anything radical passed, so don't worry about (1); but because they ARE radical it is likely they would do more than any other choice to reduce gov't/ increase individual freedom, so (2) applies least to them.

We have been calling ourselves classical liberals here in Europe, to separate us from US welfare liberals (it was the gov't welfare for every special interest group that discredited the term "liberal"), but “libertarian” is becoming known as a word, too. There’s a great AEI-Brookings paper on a very pragmatic Libertarian Paternalism.
http://www.aei.brookings.org/admin/pdffiles/phptj.pdf

Posted by: Tom Grey at October 14, 2003 02:02 AM

When it comes to ideologies, the totalitarians and collectivists are at the top of my hate list. North America does not suffer much from indigenous fascists; instead the opposite ideology, libertarianism, is our local danger. I understand the historical attraction of Mrs. Thatcher and Ms. Herold, but I am afraid that their North American followers to not understand the acid effect of radical individualism on the fabric of our social existence.

Posted by: Gideon Strauss at October 14, 2003 03:24 AM

I am afraid that their North American followers to not understand the acid effect of radical individualism on the fabric of our social existence.

Say what you will about radical individualism, it can't begin to touch the body count piled up by authoritarian states over the last century. To my mind, nothing damages the fabric of individual and social existence like mass murder. Call me when the radical individualists have managed to kill 100 million people, and we can talk about whether individualism or collectivism is the more dangerous.

Now, some minimal level of government is necessary, in my opinion, which is why libertarians are not anarchists. That minimal level is far below what we have now throughout the world. Thoughtful libertarians are trying to reverse, incrementally, the seemingly unstoppable march to larger and more powerful collectivist states.

Full disclosure: I am a contributer to samizdata.net, but I honestly believe the discussions there about the whole range of libertarian issues are as thoughtful and entertaining as I have seen anywhere. We even have contributors on both sides of the war question. Sorry, Michael, but for the most part we don't have much use for state-sponsored and -enforced living arrangements like New Urbanism. If its so great, why don't people adopt it without a jackboot prodding them on?

Drop on by if you want a taste of current thinking on libertarian issues.

Posted by: R C Dean at October 14, 2003 04:38 AM

Hey...I have alot of "objectivist" friends. You know, the Ayn Rand people. Well, let me tell you, they think incredibly little of "libertarians". They all tell me that libertarians are nothing but a bunch of anarchists and that somehow they're different (more radical, if you ask me, but different) because they accept the reality of government and simply want to change it to their own objectivist norms of "reason". These people are a strange bunch, no doubt. But I'd gladly welcome a libertarian's take on Objectivism if anybody would be so willing.

Posted by: Grant McEntire at October 14, 2003 06:25 AM

Hey, lets not start building up big expectations of the French! I remember the Reaganites getting all excited in the early 80's when Chirac was elected Mayor of Paris. I distinctly remember statements like, "the French are coming to their senses!"

:)

Posted by: Van Gale at October 14, 2003 06:41 AM

I'm a moderate libertarian.What that means is that in theory,I agree with most of the libertarian goals.However,in practice,the goals of abolishing the welfare state,public education,progressive taxation and so forth are way too radical for me.They are also way too radical to be accepted by most people,ever,at the same time.

There is a good reason for this kind of conservatism.History shows that imposing radical change in a society on a massive scale will lead to social upheaval,and worse.Just look at what happened after the French revolution.Social reform is something that ought to be practiced in bits,so as to let society adjust properly.

Libertarianism:it's a good thing in small doses,but you wouldn't want to swim in it.

Posted by: JH at October 14, 2003 06:45 AM

"I am afraid that their North American followers to not understand the acid effect of radical individualism on the fabric of our social existence."

What "acid effect" would that be?

Nothing is more frightening than people being free, huh?

Libertarianism relies upon the belief that, at his core, man is a decent creation. It requires that man must trust other men to act in a reasonable manner. Those who see other men as things to be controlled will feel their skin crawl when libertarianism mentioned. That usually manifests itself in terms like "radical individualism".

Posted by: Roark at October 14, 2003 06:52 AM

"In other words, French unions should be more like American unions."

Well, imitating our teacher's unions won't get them far away from mediocrity and job-protecting rackets, for sure not in education. We're in relatively better shape because the American people hasn't accepted unions just as it hasn't socialism, not for some kind of reasonableness implicit in our unions. Please read the Thernstroms' recent book on minority education No Excuses.

Posted by: Val at October 14, 2003 07:07 AM

It's was funny for me that you posted this today. Just yesterday, I checked out the New York Libertarian party website, and I was thinking about signing up. But I think I agree with you. I may have certain 'libertarian' leanings, but I am not so keen on the actual policies promoted by the party leadership. Anyway, it doesn't seem that there is much room for a third party in national politics, the two-party system is just too strong.

Posted by: Glenn at October 14, 2003 07:32 AM

I was interested in libertarianism for awhile, but was also turned off by the tolls. Never tell a New Jerseyan that the world needs more tolls.

Some state programs, like roads, social security, police, firemen, military defense, schools and reservoirs benefit everyone, and should be supported by everyone. We should - you know - share. Some libertarians believe that if state supported schools or social programs aren’t working, they should be replaced by private schools or charities. Pakistan already has that sort of system in place. State supported programs and schools are replaced by Islamic ‘charities’ and madrassas. It’s not working very well.

Sabine Herold and the moderate libertarians have interesting ideas – they’re not anti-war, they don’t have the ‘pull yourself up by your own bootstraps or it’s off to the poorhouse with you.’ attitude of extreme libertarians. Moderate libertarians sound like traditional anti-authoritarian liberals. Why don’t they just call themselves liberals? Are they turned off by the whole liberal/socialist/lefty/Democrat association?

You’re right, trying to stick a label on ideas is tiring. Ideologies have too many unnecessary rules. If you say that you’re a libertarian, are you allowed to support public schools? If you say you’re a Democrat, are you allowed to support pre-emptive military action? These rules may be the reason so many anti-authoritarian types don’t like to call themselves anything lately.

Posted by: mary at October 14, 2003 07:33 AM

Hello Michael. I've been reading you for a long time, including your descriptions of your political philosophies. Hate to have to be the one to break this to you, but as a "classic liberal" who believes strenuously in freedom, you're already a "small l" libertarian.

Welcome to the club.

Have to admit, the Libertarian extremes in the National party are why I left the Libertarian Party years ago, even though I continue to "protest vote" them in presidential elections. I came to feel more and more [in a similar way to your dissafection with the Democrat Party] that they didn't in the least reflect the basic views of a "classic libertarian with conservative leanings and classic liberal social views" such as myself.

It's left me effectively partyless for a decade, although I still call myself a libertarian, just as you class yourself a liberal.

Oh well. If this trend continues, we're going to see a "moderate, centrist, classic liberal, libertarian, constitutionalist, fiscally conservative, Jacksonian forien policy" independant/mainstream Common Sense Party form in the wake of the self destruction of the Republican/Democrat/Libertarian parties sooner than late.

Can't be too soon for me. [We can all argue about the exact shape and proportions of all those views in the new party when it starts to form. Should be fun. ;)]

Posted by: Ironbear at October 14, 2003 08:20 AM

Public school officials tried to intimidate us into medicating our son when it was totally unnecessary. Thank goodness for private schools. They generally do a better job of educating at a lower expense (although it comes out of your pocket.) My son now attends a public HS that we are very happy with, although we had to move to get into that school district. We took the responsibility and hassle of moving and it was worth it.

Be cautious about the Libertarian political party. I voted for the Libertarian candidate for governer in Illinois, and found out later that the party is populated by Lyndon LaRouche types.

Posted by: DaveC at October 14, 2003 08:23 AM

"Moderate libertarians sound like traditional anti-authoritarian liberals. Why don?t they just call themselves liberals? Are they turned off by the whole liberal/socialist/lefty/Democrat association?" - mary

Why yes, we are. [I'm not pregnant but I have a cat in my lap, hence the Royal "We" g]

The whole liberal/socialist/lefty/Democrat association has put me at least, off permanently from ever sticking a "Liberal" in front of my political and social views. They don't match, and I will not even by implication align myself with what has currently come to be the definition of Liberal.

Posted by: Ironbear at October 14, 2003 08:25 AM
You said:

My mother’s second husband gets tremendous rewards from his union

This seems wrong to me. I doubt that the union actually produces any rewards other than good fellowship. I suspect that you mean either that the union negotiated good things from his employer(s); or that the union is using his dues to buy some sort of group benefits. AFAIK this is about all unions actually do in a positive sense.

Posted by: mark thompson at October 14, 2003 08:43 AM

I suspect that you mean either that the union negotiated good things from his employer(s);

Yes, that's what I meant.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at October 14, 2003 09:03 AM

Interestingly, the mystery writer Stuart Kaminsky, whom I have known for many years as a colleague and who is a prominent libertarian, emailed me recently after reading my blog for the first time to ask if I, "the great leftist," had suddenly become a libertarian. Well, in some areas, sure, but in others absolutely not. One of those is education. I don't think it's an accident tht America rose to prominence in an er of strong public schools. Also, I think health care is a human right. (And of course that leaves aside the toll road nonsense that I won't even go into). Still, the libertarians have many strong arguments, stronger than ever for me, and I'm not just talking about legalized dope.

Posted by: Roger L. Simon at October 14, 2003 09:33 AM

This seems wrong to me. I doubt that the union actually produces any rewards other than good fellowship. I suspect that you mean either that the union negotiated good things from his employer(s); or that the union is using his dues to buy some sort of group benefits. AFAIK this is about all unions actually do in a positive sense.

Are you being sarcastic? ALL they do? That's like saying that the government doesn't really do anything for us, because it just uses the taxes we pay to buy some group benefits (like the military, education, social security, etc...) and negotiates "good things" from other countries. I don't know about you, but I participate in the political process for more than just "fellowship."

Posted by: Smokey at October 14, 2003 09:43 AM

"moderate, centrist, classic liberal, libertarian, constitutionalist, fiscally conservative, Jacksonian forien policy" independant/mainstream Common Sense Party

Sign me up.

Another way to look at it: a party that favors the common good over special interests. The problem: where would the activists and financial support come from?

It's not hopeless, though -- to some degree, this is the Clinton / DLC wing of the Democratic party, and moderate wing of the Republican party.

Posted by: Oberon at October 14, 2003 10:30 AM

Hey, don't knock the toll-road idea. It's not practical everywhere, such as the sparsely populated stretches of road in the west, but it toll charges are a very efficient way of balancing the need for (1) road construction (2) road maintinance, and (3) traffic congestion in urban areas. It's actually been a pretty successful experiment in London (though perhaps too punitive), where it was initiated by "Red" Ken Livingston of all people.

Posted by: George at October 14, 2003 10:53 AM

Oberon,

I guess the money is the key isn't it? I'd give to a party that promised to help those in need, but weed out those who aren't (rather than "pay" them to like the party), who didn't try to win my vote by demonizing efforts to do what in the end makes sense (at least to me), but also respects me enough to let me do my own thing as long as I'm not hurting others.

Would a primary-less election do the trick? Maybe in conjunction with a single term limit? The recent California election for all its crazy candidates was interesting in that R's had their choice between Arnold and Tom, while D's could only vote for Cruz. Maybe if there were no primaries and no imcumbents (or maybe allow incumbents but not allow them to advertise since they're so exposed anyway) then people could actually find, support and vote for a candidate that meets their ideal. Voters could weigh the candidates adherence to specific positions vs. electability to a finer degree than under the primary system.

Maybe that's all un-workable, but it sure would be (and was in the Recall) nice to have more choices.

Posted by: crionna at October 14, 2003 11:40 AM

Unions gave us the 40-hour work week. Today, they give us the 40-day strike. We'll see them getting a little more public exposure, given the grocery clerk's strike in California (now spreading to the East coast). They start at around $36,000/year, with full health coverage. They're striking because the companies want them to pay $5/week ($15 for families) for their coverage - which is one of the best around. Today the Los Angeles transit mechanics went on strike - shutting down LA's bus service. They're only making $50k/year.

The pendulum has swung to the other side. Henry Ford broke his strikers. Today a union of 10,000 people could shut down the country (the Longshoremen, who came close last year.)

I get the impression that the French unions are more socialist than ours.

Posted by: Mike at October 14, 2003 11:48 AM

While the libertarianism of Sabine Herold (and of Matt Welch, Virginia Postrel, Samizadata.net etc.) is admirable; the rigid, doctrinaire big L Libertarianism of the Libertarian Party, and of the rest of the writers for the current incarnation of Reason magazine are about as far from the post-ideological, post-label centrism of you and of Roger L. Simon as you can get.
If you look at the comments section for Matt Welch's post of the link to his Sabine Herold piece on Hit and Run, you'll see almost all the comments are from people claming that he is some kind of heretic for daring to invoke the holy libertarian label to describe someone who supported the Iraq War, or indeed, any war, ever. For the rigid, doctrinaire, big-L type Libertarians this is an absolute litmus test issue, sort of like being pro-choice is for liberals, and these are the types who dominate the Libertarian Party, and increasingly, Reason Magazine. And, they also have a lot of overlap with even more extreme ideologues: anrchists, minarchists, anrcho-capitalists, Ayn Rand disciples, and the like. PJ O'Rourke had this great comment about the Libertarian Party, something like that it was a bunch of High School Math teachers, arguing about how to privatize the sidewalks. I'm more inclined to agree with your assessment in the 90's than your present one. I suspect that libertarianism seems more palatable to you now that you've gotten tired of the conventional Left and are seeking out different viewpoints, but I'm not sure if Big-L Libertarians matured in the interim. I'd be more inclined to say the opposite, particularly in the case of Reason Magazine, which under Virginia Postrel portrayed a more common sense, Hayekian perspective, and now under Nick Gillespie is something entirely different.

Posted by: Eric Deamer at October 14, 2003 12:00 PM

Michael,

I wonder how long your credulous love of unions would last stuck on the freeway in Los Angeles. Knowing you, I am sure that you could endure a day for solidarity's sake. You probably would last at least a week. But on the seventh week of the seventh year...oops, just drifted into an augary...after several years of this kind of crap and the insidious effects of routine striking your love of unions would likely turn ugly. American unions survive better because of the treat of strike. In France, and much of the EU, strikes are the endless tollbooths of their existance; extorting a toll on the economy and the people as if it were their due.

The greatest gift the Unions ever recieved from Washington was the Taft-Hartley Act which prevents them from shutting down the United States and being loathed in return. We just invaded two nations because 3,000 of our citizens and guests were killed, and we would not stand for that kind of effrontery happening again. How well would the unions stand up if they were conspicuously culpable for the deaths of fifteen thousand Americans?

The key to American stability is the balance of power and the notion that all power derives from the people, not the government, the corporations, the military, nor the unions. In France they have never established that balance as a central idea of their identity and they suffer for it now. Hooray for Sabine Herold for providing the beleagered French with the prospect of equitable liberty.

Posted by: Patrick Lasswell at October 14, 2003 12:12 PM

"Also, I think health care is a human right."

Roger, How so? Perhaps you mean the "pursuit of healthcare" is a human right." :>)

IMO Life and Liberty are human rights inherent in being alive, but the "pursuit of happiness" was so worded on purpose. The human right of "life" does not and cannot include any aspects pertaining to quality. Assert your right to be cancer-free or Parkinson's-free for life, for, example.

Since "Healthcare" comprises scientific discovery by individuals, invention and development of applications therefrom, and the time and expertise of individuals to provide it, in what way will you mandate compliance to provide healthcare as a "right" by law. What will be the consequences if the providers refuse?

You could say "just provide all of the above through government spending--since all the components and people in 'healthcare' are under the wing of the government, no coercion is involved." Would it work? Go to a CAT scan clinic in upstate New York and ask for a show of Canadian hands.

BTW I think the healthcare industry in the United States is presently showing all the severe distortion often predicted to occur in an over regulated business segment. Let it go and stand back.

Posted by: Stephen at October 14, 2003 12:15 PM

PJ O'Rourke had this great comment about the Libertarian Party, something like that it was a bunch of High School Math teachers, arguing about how to privatize the sidewalks.

Heh. Yes, the big-L libertarians can't have me. They just can't.

he [Matt Welch] is some kind of heretic for daring to invoke the holy libertarian label to describe someone who supported the Iraq War, or indeed, any war, ever.

Yeah, for that reason too. As I said, the small-l libertarians are tempting, but I do have to pass.

What I'm doing instead is adding libertarianism to my ever-expanding intellectual toolbox. At the moment it includes left-liberalism, feminism, secularism, humanism, environmentalism, small-l libertarianism, and neo-conservatism. The last thing I want to do is pick up only one of the above while throwing the rest into the trash.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at October 14, 2003 01:01 PM

I think as an experiment it would be great to have a an affluent country organized on libertarian lines...but I'm fairly certain that it would be a country that I wouldn't want to live in -- one ruled by large corporations.

Posted by: Markus Rose at October 14, 2003 03:22 PM

In re "...one ruled by large corporations"

"...such people need to learn the difference between economic power and political power--on their backs as, I think, they will."

      -Ayn Rand (Francisco D'Anconia), Atlas Shrugged

Posted by: Stephen at October 14, 2003 03:46 PM

"I don't think it's an accident tht America rose to prominence in an er of strong public schools. Also, I think health care is a human right. (And of course that leaves aside the toll road nonsense that I won't even go into)."

One way to be practical AND libertarian is to advocate for market-driven processes (as opposed to command-and-control processes) even in government-controlled publically funded areas. Vouchers for education is a good example. Another is the modernization and reduction of the federal government payroll undertaken by Gore during the Clinton admin. Which worked as far as I know.

My achilles heel is arts funding, public libraries, and wilderness areas. There are certain things essential to civilization that fall victim to the tragedy of the commons if left to market forces. But their administrations can still be informed by good business practices and not have the non-profit organizational culture.

Posted by: Yehudit at October 14, 2003 04:07 PM

Yehudit,

I agree totally.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at October 14, 2003 04:13 PM

You might consider adding Georgism, for Henry George (The Single Tax) advocating a land value tax. Modern Georgists often expand that to include other extractive (gold, radio bandwith) industries, and some (like me) to include pollution taxes and their surrogates. Like gas taxes. With all the discussion about left-right, one on a ranking of taxes (individ income tax about the worst) might be illuminating.

Posted by: Tom Grey at October 14, 2003 05:06 PM

Roger, I think any civilization to be proud of would have a system of generous health care available for all. But the problem of "health care as a right" involves the need to impose a duty, on somebody else, to give the care. Who, how much -- decided by force of gov't.

Given the current health mess, imagine a few changes: a 100% tax credit (much better than deduction) for personal and family health insurance, and also for any charity which uses at least 80% of its funds for health care for the poor and uninsured.
An increase in the number of accredited Med schools (currently monopolistically limited).
The replacement of current laws against practicing medicine w/o a licence with a written statement of a pacient agreeing to pay for care that might be medical care from a non-licensed care worker.

Health care problems would be greatly reduced.

Note an issue with lib-oriented problem reductions -- it doesn't promise that the problem is solved for everyone. Thus, even if a market oriented small gov't practice works better than the Canadian socialist practices, the big gov't promise to care for all always sounds better.

Posted by: Tom Grey at October 14, 2003 05:25 PM

Michael,

French unions should be more like American unions.

There is an important distinction to be made between public and private sector unions. Private sector unions are ultimately constrained by market discipline. Public sector unions are not. Public sector unions are much more powerful in France which is one reason why that country is in a downward spiral.

Posted by: HA at October 14, 2003 06:09 PM

Here are something interesting differences between Republicans and Democrats. Read into it what you wish:

Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say they believe in God (by eight percentage points), in heaven (by 10 points), in hell (by 15 points), and considerably more likely to believe in the devil (by 17 points). Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they believe in reincarnation (by 14 percentage points), in astrology (by 14 points), in ghosts (by eight points) and UFOs (by five points).

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html

Posted by: HA at October 14, 2003 06:30 PM

What we really need is a pragmatist's party.

Posted by: linden at October 14, 2003 07:02 PM

HA,

I don't believe in any of that stuff. Not a bit of it.

Posted by: Michael J. Totten at October 14, 2003 07:30 PM

HA, way to go with the cheap rhetorical non sequiter. I know that you're aware there's been an interesting discussion going on here, because your comment right before this was on topic and a good point. So, if you really feel like you just have to get the word out about the Democrats but the subject material just isn't steering your way, may I suggest starting your own blog?

Posted by: Christopher Luebcke at October 14, 2003 09:58 PM

Christopher, perhaps HA posted a bit out of context, where the question is why did SF vote to keep Gray Davis?:
>>> The San Francisco Chronicle poses the question, and Orville Schell, dean of the journalism school at the University of California, Berkeley, offered this answer: "It strikes me that the better educated people are, more often than not, they tend to be more liberal, and I think this is a very well-educated area." <<<
The (I saw through WSJ) article includes exit poll breakdowns by education, followed by the Fox poll.
The relevance is that the "educated elites" vote/ support the Dems, and for big gov't, and to punish those who gain success through the market rather than, like at school, through verbal intelligence. See Nozick (libertarian hero, writer of Anarchy, State, and Utopia -- who disavowed the Lib. Party) Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?:
http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/NozickCapitalism.htm
"It is surprising that intellectuals oppose capitalism so. Other groups of comparable socio-economic status do not show the same degree of opposition in the same proportions. Statistically, then, intellectuals are an anomaly.
...
Intellectuals now expect to be the most highly valued people in a society, those with the most prestige and power, those with the greatest rewards. Intellectuals feel entitled to this. But, by and large, a capitalist society does not honor its intellectuals."

As Nozick says, this is a real, and important issue. I think it explains a lot of Bush-Hatred by Paul Krugman & the Left. There's a huge amount of Pride on the Left about the Left's intelligence -- but it's prolly more than a bit misplaced.

Your blog is good Christopher, I'd agree that most posters here should consider starting their own.

Posted by: Tom Grey at October 15, 2003 01:36 AM

Ok, my last peanut gallery comment I swear!

"Earning comparisons to Joan of Arc ... in the panting British press"

I wonder if she should be scared that the Brits are comparing her to Joan of Arc? :)

Posted by: Van Gale at October 15, 2003 01:52 AM

I rolled around the LP as a board member of one of the largest states and convention rep. It is a terrible thing to have done, to mix the general school of thought up with an ineffective political party. The politics don't make sense and the bloc of freethinkers are nothing but a debating society. Nothing ever gets done and the whole movement winds up marginalized. The best thing to happen to small-l libertarianism would be if the big-L Party would cease to exist.

Posted by: Undertoad at October 15, 2003 04:24 AM

Christopher,

Who appointed you to the blog topic purity patrol? Lighten up. Unless, of course, you have deeply held beliefs about reincarnation, astrology, ghosts or UFO's. If so, then I apologize for offending you.

Believe me, Michael is certainly capable of policing his own blog. And you might note that he appears to have seen the humor in the poll results.

And I don't see how the post was off-topic. Many secularists - usually leftists but not always - look down on those who have traditional faiths because of their supposed superstitions. It looks like both sides have their superstitions.

Posted by: HA at October 15, 2003 04:27 AM

There are certain things essential to civilization that fall victim to the tragedy of the commons if left to market forces.

The tragedy of the commons is what happens when you have resources that are NOT subject to market forces, that is, are no one's property and thus available to all. In the context of state subsidization of favored activities, invoking the tragedy of the commons is at best a non sequitur.

The idea that a central bureaucracy, disbursing funds extorted from the populace, is the best way to guarantee a vibrant cultural life is, to my mind, utterly absurd. Vibrant culture comes from the bottom up, not from bureaucracies, and whenever you talk about public funding, you are talking about committees and bureaucracies controlling the funding. I note that in France, the film industry is heavily subsidized, and moribund compared to that of the US and India, where the film industry is conspicuously, and raucously, private.

Posted by: R C Dean at October 15, 2003 04:50 AM

I've found Libertarian ideas to be useful to me as a classical liberal for some time. They are often right about problems, but often wrong or contradictory about solutions.

Vouchers is a quick example. Sure, it's the privatization of education - but so what? Mostly to satisfy the Libertarians deep desire to get the government out of the business - which I understand. I'm not bullish on this mainly because I don't think there will ever be any meaningful competition between schools - just too expensive to get going for too little return. And without meaningful and dynamic competition, you can't get me excited about the privatization of anything. Meanwhile, I know from going to private school that tuition will be the current tuition plus the voucher the second they are put in place. I'd eat my hat if one poor kid got in one of those places on a voucher alone. Charter schools will do, I'd say.

Libertarians say taxes distort markets and take wealth out of the economy. They are 100% correct! But wait... they are not anarchists! They are going to have to tax! A flat tax? Oh who cares, it still hurts. As long as we manage to have a reasonable progressive taxation system thats comfortably less stifling on the rich than Europe or other socialist dystopias, I'll be perfectly fine.

Posted by: Jonas Cord at October 15, 2003 05:01 AM

"Sign me up.

Another way to look at it: a party that favors the common good over special interests. The problem: where would the activists and financial support come from?" - Oberon.

Sign me up too. Now, where do we go to sign exactly? Who do we have that's even trying to put togther a party/coalition of voters and candidates like I described?

Financial support, I'd suppose, would have to come from the same sources all politics draws theirs. Unfortunately, that'd also mean special interest groups and lobbyists... bad with the good?

Activists? Do we need them? ;]

I'd hope that the activists would come from the same type of people who voted in the California recall, and who are working in the Free State project. People to whom the kind of views I described are important to.

Dunno. I've been awake 20 hours working, and I'm muzzy and [I think] catching the flu. I'm definately not thinking on my feet well right now.

Posted by: Ironbear at October 15, 2003 07:14 AM

I'll caution everyone here that starting a new party is not for sissies. There are significant legal and financial barriers imposed by state election laws. It would be far easier to take over the existing LP and get rid of the antiwar loonies.

(I was active in the LP from '81-'98, was an officer in 2 state parties, ran for public office 3 times, gathered something upward of 1,000 signatures in ballot-access drives, attended state conventions nearly every year, and was a delegate to 4 national conventions.)

Posted by: Jay Manifold at October 15, 2003 08:10 AM

Jay,

I acknowledge your concerns about difficulties, although there is much to be said for many hands make light work and nervous bureaucrats. Show up with enough hands and you might well be their next boss.

More to the point though is that the advantage of reinventing the wheel is that the new wheel doesn't necessarily have the same crap attached to it. Since most people interested in a new party are mostly interested in cutting the old crap out, the other failings of the process are often overlooked.

I have great hopes and tremendous doubts about the near term efficacy and the long term stability of a new party. It is critical to remember that much of the strength of the existing duopoly is their ability to get their friends work. Much of this is due to the current political structure growing directly from the political boss system. In the abscence of entrenched interests in support of a new party, it will be difficult to get the enduring volunteer strength needed to accomplish widespread voter turnout and election results. I am not saying that this cannot be accomplished, but it is a difficult that needs to be addressed.

Posted by: Patrick Lasswell at October 15, 2003 11:13 AM

Who appointed you to the blog topic purity patrol?

Deputy Dawg.

Ok, so you and at least one other person found your post relevant. Sorry that I didn't.

Posted by: Christopher Luebcke at October 15, 2003 12:04 PM

Christopher,

Deputy Dawg.

Heh, heh, heh!

I googled Deputy Dawg for the heck of it and found an interesting bit of Cold War Americana. Here is the synopsis of one episode:

A space capsule from Russia lands in Creek Mud. Deputy Dawg and Muskie try to protect the space capsule's pilot Mischa Mouse from a Kremlin official who wants to return Mischa to The USSR.

http://www.bcdb.com/bcdb/detailed.cgi?film=19395&p=s

Do you think we'll someday have cartoons featuring Chinese space capsules?

Now since it was you who brought up Deputy Dawg, don't slam me for being off-topic! OK Muskie?

Posted by: HA at October 15, 2003 06:05 PM

Da, HA.

Posted by: Christopher Luebcke at October 16, 2003 07:33 AM

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right.

Posted by: Sachdev Rivka at December 10, 2003 12:24 PM

There's a fine line between genius and insanity. I have erased this line.

Posted by: Lee Jung at December 10, 2003 12:24 PM

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right.

Posted by: Iturralde Lucilla at December 20, 2003 04:56 PM

There are as many translators as there are humans.

Posted by: LaPierre George at January 9, 2004 06:48 AM

Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are `It might have been.

Posted by: Grindle Alex at March 16, 2004 11:39 PM

Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Posted by: Meyers Ben at April 28, 2004 06:49 AM

Advertising is 85% confusion and 15% commission.

Posted by: Levenberg Karen at June 30, 2004 04:14 AM

abala da dae

Posted by: penis enlargement pills at July 14, 2004 10:37 AM

Very good subject.
logo-mobile-repondeur
logo-repondeur-mobile
logo-sonneries-sonnerie
logos-mobile-repondeurs
logos-repondeurs-mobile
logos-sonneries-sonnerie
mobile-repondeur-logo
mobile-repondeurs-logos
netimobile
repondeur-logo-mobile
repondeurs-logos-mobile
sonnerie-logo-sonneries
sonnerie-logos-sonneries
sonnerie-sonneries-logo
sonnerie-sonneries-logos
sonneries-sonnerie-logo
sonneries-sonnerie-logos
planete-mobile
ringtone-logos
ringtone-mobiles
01-ringtone
ringtone-free
logo-phones
logo-free
01-logo
logo-tones
ringtones-phone
ringtones-mobiles
ringtones-pictures
ringtones-screensavers
logos-phones
logos-tone
logos-downloads
logos-free
polyphonic-tone
screensaver-mobile
01-melodia
top-melodia
e-melodias
logo-melodias
logo-moviles
01-ringetone
top-ringetone
ringetone-mobil
logoer-mobil
top-logoer
01-ringsignaler
top-ringsignaler
ringsignaler-mobil
logotyper-mobil
01-logotyper
01-suonerie
i-suonerie
suonerie-mobile
01-loghi
top-loghi
01-soittoaanet
top-soittoaanet
soittoaanet-logot
01-logot
i-logot
01-beltonen
top-beltonen
beltonen-logo
logo-mobiel
logo-beltonen
01-toque
top-toque
toque-movel
icone-movel
icone-toque
1-klingeltone
hit-klingeltone
klingeltone-logo
logo-klingeltone
logo-spiele
ringtone download
ringtone downloads
ringtone free
free nokia ringtone
mobile ringtone
samsung ringtone
ringtone keypress
phone ringtone
chinese ringtone
free ringtone composer
free ringtone download
ringtone siemens
hindi ringtone
ringtone ericsson
3310 ringtone
mobile phone ringtone
free ringtone for nokia
t68i ringtone
ringtone for free
ringtone for motorola
rtttl ringtone
send ringtone
sms ringtone
bollywood ringtone
indian ringtone
dilemma ringtone
nokia ringtone codes
ringtone key
ringtone melodies
ringtone and logo
anime ringtone
poly ringtone
ringtone and logos
nokia ringtone download
alcatel ringtone
nokia ringtone downloads
in da club ringtone
3360 ringtone
nokia ringtone converter
free ringtone codes
ringtone jukebox
rttl ringtone
motorola v60 ringtone
free ringtone sites
arabic ringtone
cell phone ringtone
ringtone converters
3210 ringtone
midi to ringtone
a300 ringtone
sagem ringtone
ringtone polyphonic
motorola ringtone composer
ringtone nokia composer
mario ringtone
ringtone sms
ringtone creator
bond ringtone
download free ringtone
ketchup ringtone
lord of the rings ringtone
wanksta ringtone
polyphonic ringtone uploader
handphone ringtone
ringtone composer for nokia
free ericsson ringtone
ringtone australia
james bond ringtone
new ringtone
birthday ringtone
free nokia ringtone downloads
free samsung ringtone
ringtone website
coding workshop ringtone converter crack
dance ringtone
ringtone download free
cellphone ringtone
ringtone converter 3.9
hero ringtone
buffy ringtone
ringtone melody
f4 ringtone
ignition ringtone
jackass ringtone
garage ringtone
ringtone free nokia
free ringtone notes
superman ringtone
angel ringtone
free siemens ringtone
mobile ringtone download
ringtone malaysia
send free ringtone
wap ringtone
mmf ringtone
a team ringtone
free logo ringtone
melody ringtone
die another day ringtone
c45 ringtone
ringtone galore
ericson ringtone
ringtone player
download polyphonic ringtone
free nokia ringtone codes
nelly ringtone
shakira ringtone
smooth criminal ringtone
eye of the tiger ringtone
cingular ringtone
ringtone tabs
ringtone converter v3 8
logical song ringtone
nokia 7210 ringtone
friends ringtone
game ringtone
send a ringtone
8210 ringtone
japanese ringtone
mobile ringtone downloads
free indian ringtone
spongebob ringtone
tatu ringtone
t300 ringtone
8390 ringtone
nokia chinese ringtone
passenger seat ringtone
nokia 8310 ringtone
justin timberlake ringtone
indiana jones ringtone
football ringtone
flint ringtone
coding ringtone
eminem without me ringtone
free nokia ringtone download
ringtone eminem
universal ringtone converter
i need a girl part 2 ringtone
ringtone codes for nokia
ringtone for nokia 3210
ringtone converter 3.3
inspector gadget ringtone
ringtone via sms
ringtone nokia keypress
kiss ringtone
league of gentlemen ringtone
ringtone mission impossible
siemens c45 ringtone
top ringtone
cry ringtone
ericcson ringtone
motorola free ringtone
mario bros ringtone
motorola t190 ringtone
ringtone conversion
transformers ringtone
angelina ringtone
coding workshop ringtone converter v3 3.0
coding workshop ringtone converter key
ringtone composition
clocks ringtone
final countdown ringtone
coding workshop ringtone converter 3.9
ignition remix ringtone
cellular ringtone
ringtone studio
compose nokia ringtone
back to the future ringtone
ringtone nokia indonesia
ringtone instructions
wav ringtone
airwolf ringtone
composer ringtone nokia
exorcist ringtone
ericsson free ringtone
all my life ringtone
t39 ringtone
malaysia ringtone
free mobile phone ringtone
s40 ringtone
siemens ringtone composer
yahoo ringtone
red dwarf ringtone
sex in the city ringtone
take on me ringtone
in the end ringtone
next episode ringtone
ringtone siemen
dj sammy heaven ringtone
evanescence ringtone
game ka na ba ringtone
charmed ringtone
bonnie and clyde ringtone
free logo free ringtone
ringtone 3210
t200 ringtone
ringtone bollywood
free ringtone melodies
metal gear solid 2 ringtone
ringtones
free ringtones
polyphonic ringtones
ringtones for nokia
ringtones free
motorola ringtones
samsung ringtones
free mobile ringtones
logos and ringtones
keypress ringtones
ringtones for samsung
ringtones for motorola
hindi ringtones
free motorola ringtones
free ringtones free
free logos and ringtones
ringtones free logos
ringtones for free
tamil ringtones
a300 ringtones
free downloadable ringtones
download free ringtones
composed ringtones
midi ringtones
arabic ringtones
ringtones for nokia phones
ringtones siemens
composable ringtones
ringtones for panasonic
free mobile phone ringtones
ringtones australia
nokia keypress ringtones
nokia ringtones composer
www ringtones
cellphone ringtones
free ringtones composer
motorola v60 ringtones
t720 ringtones
free hindi ringtones
cingular ringtones
free nokia 3360 ringtones
3210 ringtones
free ringtones and free logos
free bollywood ringtones
latest ringtones
ringtones for mobiles
wireless ringtones
free sms ringtones
ringtones for sony ericsson
ringtones for a nokia
free ringtones free logos com
ringtones to compose
ringtones for samsung t100
rock ringtones
free nokia ringtones and logos
polyphonic ringtones for nokia
rttl ringtones
at&t ringtones
www free ringtones free logos
get free ringtones
key press ringtones
cheap ringtones
8310 ringtones
ringtones & logos
ringtones panasonic
3330 ringtones
gd67 ringtones
ringtones for cell phones
ringtones for my nokia
free nokia 3390 ringtones
ringtones for sprint
polyphonic ringtones for samsung
wap ringtones
t300 ringtones
att ringtones
motorola v60i ringtones
free ringtones for sagem
nokia mobile ringtones
ringtones sent to your phone
mobile ringtones and logos
ringtones for nokia composer
free ringtones for a nokia
free ringtones for nokia 3360
ringtones and icons
free ringtones siemens
free tamil ringtones
where can i get free ringtones
motorola v50 ringtones
free panasonic ringtones
motorolla ringtones
free arabic ringtones
ringtones sony ericsson
3310 free ringtones
ringtones via sms
cell ringtones
free nokia polyphonic ringtones
malay ringtones
composer nokia ringtones
christmas ringtones
ringtones indonesia
tdma ringtones
song ringtones
ringtones for nokia mobiles
ringtones rtttl
ringtones sagem
asian ringtones
polophonic ringtones
ringtones in composer
free sony ericsson ringtones
free ringtones and graphics
1260 ringtones
free poly ringtones
free hip hop ringtones
8265 ringtones
ringtones for t68i
nokia 3410 ringtones
ringtones for my mobile
logo and ringtones
free composable ringtones
nokia ringtones keypress
type in ringtones
50 cent ringtones
ringtones sites
free nokia logos and ringtones
nokia 1260 ringtones
ringtones screensavers
free rap ringtones
hindi ringtones for nokia
nokia ringtones logos
ringtones for motorola t191
nokia 3310 free ringtones
ringtones us
ringtones for kyocera
ringtones t68i
free nokia 3210 ringtones
free ringtones for cell
gx10 ringtones
keypad ringtones
p800 ringtones
free polyphonic ringtones for nokia
latest hindi ringtones
mobile logos and ringtones
ringtones gratis
motorola 120t ringtones
logos and ringtones for nokia
polyphonic ringtones for samsung t100
ringtones on composer
ringtones and pictures
ringtones key
siemens free ringtones
311 ringtones
ringtones graphics
punk ringtones
ringtones net
downloadable ringtones for nokia
ringtones for a motorola
ringtones nokia 3390
ringtones and logos
moblie ringtones
free ringtones and icons
free t68i ringtones
nokia 3510i ringtones
ringtones for sharp
free ringtones to download
gratis ringtones
f4 ringtones
keypress nokia ringtones
free ringtones for cell phones
r&b ringtones
telugu ringtones
t28 ringtones
ringtones for nokia 3510
ringtones indian
free ringtones for alcatel
download ringtones for nokia
ringtones codes
downloadable nokia ringtones
irish ringtones
free ringtones for nokia mobile
for free ringtones
free ringtones to compose
nokia 3310 composer ringtones
ringtones for lg
siemens c35 ringtones
panasonic polyphonic ringtones
t100 free ringtones
nokia 5210 ringtones
free 3310 ringtones
frre ringtones
ringtones verizon
free cellular ringtones
mtv ringtones
attwireless com ringtones
ringtones for nextel
ringtones for cellphones
nokia hindi ringtones
ericsson ringtones free
n400 ringtones
dvd-pascher
cdmusique pascher
jeuxvideo pascher
mobile pascher
pc pascher
pda pascher
livre pascher

Posted by: alex at July 23, 2004 03:20 PM

live cams

Posted by: live sex at August 1, 2004 08:07 AM

realy nice web site

Posted by: casino at August 2, 2004 05:47 AM

I just wanted so say thank you guys ! i really like your site and i hope you'll continue to improving it

Posted by: viagra at August 4, 2004 05:12 AM

free porn - german porn - free porn downloads - french porn - japanese porn - free full length porn - dutch porn - young porn - porn preview - free porn preview - free japanese porn - free porn - celebrity porn - porn trailer - free porn trailer - midget porn - free porn vids - free hard core porn - hard core porn - free live porn - free porn clip - free porn movie samples - free sample porn - free porn video samples - porn downloads - free celeb porn - absolutely free porn - free celebrity porn - free membership porn - porn vids - celeb porn - free german porn - free young porn - free porn sample videos - live porn - porn sample - free porn sample - free porn download - free full length porn videos - sample porn - password porn - free full length porn movie - free porn video sample - free french porn - porn story - free porn trial - porn photo - hard porn - free porn credit card - free porn sample video - free sample porn video - japanese porn free - free porn movie preview - free live sex shows - free preview porn - free porn streaming - free streaming porn - porn movie clip - full length porn free - free trailer porn - porn free sample - free celebrity porn videos - porn video downloads - free long porn movie - full length free porn - porn site password - free sample video porn - streaming porn - free fat porn - porn movie sample - free sample video - password porn site - free japan porn - sample porn movie - photo porn - porn movie trailer - free porn web cams - full length porn - japan teen sex - porn movie preview - sample movie porn - gay guy porn - free porn web cam - japanese sex movie - free porn movie clips - free full length porn downloads - free porn video previews - free movie porn - free male porn - free porn videos online - free long porn - free full length porno - porn thumb - free full length porn video - porn star movie - free lesbian porn videos - porn free trailer - credit card free porn - membership free porn - free pass porn - free porn movie download - free full length porn movies - free online porn games - free ebony porn clips - free sample porn movie - porn thumbnail - mpeg porn - trailer porn - free porn video downloads - free full-length porn - free porn pix - celebrity porn videos - porn pix - porn japan - free full length porn vids - long porn - free ebony porn trailers - porn streaming - porn web cam - free porn movie trailer - french porn star - porn free - long porn movie - free long porn videos - free porn clip samples - free membership porn videos - absolutely free porn videos - free porn thumbnail - free porn movie downloads - free movie trailers porn - porn free download - free milf porn videos - free milf - free clip xxx - free porn star videos - free porn videos - free erotic video clips - xxx vids - pass porn - free full length porn movie download - free porn movie - free movie sample - free long movie - sample video xxx - free porn movie membership - german porn site - porn game download - video preview porn - free preview porn videos - free full porn movie downloads - porn movie - hard core free porn - free long sex video - free porn gallery - dutch porn free - porn free trial - free japanese porn videos - porn video - porn videos-com - free videos - free porn cam - porn trial - free preview porn video - free video clip - xxx free mpeg - free anal video - full length porn for free - credit card porn - porn membership - free sample trailer
free sex - tamil sex - sex trailer - free sex trailer - illustrated sex stories - sex clip - password sex - free sex clip - free sex film - hard sex - porn clip - sex vids - sex password - free sex vids - free illustrated sex stories - trailer sex - free online sex games - free trailer sex - free sex video samples - free sex cam - sample sex video - free sample sex videos - sex video sample - clip sex - free sample sex video - free xxx mpeg - lesbian sex videos - free sex downloads - free audio sex stories - film sex free - video clip sex - xxx mpeg - sex trailer free - free sample videos - sex stories tamil - sample sex movie - celebrity sex - free sex web cams - sex position photo - free sex preview - sex video preview - free sex movie clip - movie clip sex - japan free sex - free xxx vids - free sex movie sample - tamil sex sites - group sex video - free sex show - video sample - video sample sex - free celebrity sex - group sex pic - vintage sex - free sample video sex - sex video trailer - sex position - tamil sex site - free sex mpeg - sex game - free full length sex movie - free sex tape - free milf videos - sex vintage - hard core xxx - free preview sex - sample video sex - free sex movie trailers - free movie - free long sex videos - oral sex photo - free group sex videos - free group sex - old woman sex - japan sex photo - long sex movie - free sex video trailer - free password sex - free sex sample video - sex thumb - free asian downloads - free audio sex - tamil nude - free tamil sex stories - sex free film - free live sex - free movie clip sex - xxx hard - free sex sample videos - sex movie - hard sex photo - sex japan - free sex position - sex photo woman - free japanese sex movie - sex clip free - free sample sex - free anal sex videos - free lesbian downloads - erotica free - photo sex - free sex games online - free interracial sex - interracial sex - free group sex video - free photo sex - sex tamil - free tamil sex - free full length videos - sex site password - free sex sample movie - free clip sex - sex photo - password sex site - free sex movie - desi sex - trailer sex free - free japan sex - free online sex game - live sex show free - free milf downloads - free porn star mpegs - sex film - sex position videos - position sex - star xxx - free sample sex movie - photo woman sex - teen movie sample - sample movie sex - free japanese sex videos - sex position picture - free sex photo - sex free preview - free milf - free clip xxx - free sex chat rooms - sex photo japan - sex free japan - free sex japan - xxx vids - free xxx clip - japanese sex free - free movie sample - free video sample sex - free erotica - sex video free sample - sample video xxx - tamil sex picture - free sex thumb - tamil sex video - sex free sample - free xxx thumb