July 1, 2010
This Site is Moving
I'll be moving this blog over to the Pajamas Media site shortly. You can adjust your bookmarks if you want, but that's optional. You should be automatically redirected.
If you use an RSS reader, point it here for the new feed. The RSS feed you have been using will no longer work. If you don't know what an RSS feed is, you don't have to do anything.
You know that many of your old TCS links don't work? Can you create your own on-line archive of your stuff that they've taken down/ hidden?
Just in time for your book ... any news on that?
I'll make an announcement about the book shortly. Everything is on track.
Will blog links auto-re-direct, or should they be updated as well (seems like it)?
GRATZ
OVERDUE,
R
Never had any problem here. I have Road Runner high speed cable with Time Warner and use Foxfire, I'm not sure that makes any difference.....
2. Don't see comments when clicking on comments.
3. I'll get over the advertising so close to header. This site here is a bit more calm and spacey. Probably some great exposure thought.
Michael, judging from the articles, you'll REALLY be the voice of reason...
It should appear tomorrow, I think.
Don't see comments when clicking on comments.
The comments from this site were already exported to that site, so any comments left at this site from here on out won't appear over there.
I guess you have to sign up and log in over there, but you should only have to log in once. I've been logged in to comment on the PJ site continuously for months.
It works for me. Check again?
Yes, thanks for letting me know. I missed that.
The comment systems are separate. All comments from this site were exported to that site a few days ago, but it was a one-time copy and paste. Leaving a comment here or there won't automatically copy it there or here.
Well, I'm not going there for the comments section.
My comments section here doesn't include that sort of thing, and it might not over there either.
We all know that the move to PJM wouldn't change the excellent, informative and unbiased articles that you post but I fear you are wrong about the comments section. PJM changed for the worse after Obama was elected.
I scanned the comment threads at PJM and its a mixed bag. Great comment from New Republic editor blasting Fareed. Michael is sure to keep a line down. Actually the wing nuts on both sides present the commentators here a great chance to show how sane and non-partisan they are. It will only help to thwart the narrative of an "echo chamber".
Thank God for small favors.
"PJM is chock full of garden variety Christian Zionists, extreme right-wing Jews, Randians and other assorted BORING people. United by crassness, intolerance, interchangability and the propensity to view President Obama as a Muslim socialist born in Kenya."
That's rich coming from a malicious Jew-baiting nitwit who likes to compare Israel to Nazi Germany.
You may pick up some extra traffic and ad revenue.
Can't hold that against you. In a better world, you'd have found some permanent co-bloggers and let this thing grow as an independent mideast blog. It's probably true that you didn't post enough content here often enough to really make this place known enough to make you a living wage on it. Nobody's a sole proprietor anymore.
I don't think the crazy people will give you too hard a time. You're pretty good at framing things in a them-friendly tone. There's no way in hell I'm signing up for Pajamas Media anything, so this is the end of the ride for public conversation. No big loss, work keeps me out of comment sections these days anyway.
You were right about Charles Johnson - and Charles Johnson is right about PJM. Someday Andrew Breitbart will own that place.
Ladies and gentlemen, the self-defining epitaph of this comment section. Wrap it up. Call it a night. Special thanks to the folks who made sure every possible policy argument or ethical debate was covered with a nice even layer of hate.
See you on the evening news.
This American administration, like its predecessors, creates a target-rich environment for satirists; so there's much mockery, some of it too personal for my taste. But I don't hear or read actual hate from the fellow conservatives I admire. Those I respect focus their energy on the message.
Bull's eye.
And after all, if the Democrats (to which party I assume the bleaters incline) could embrace and eulogize a bona-fide hood wearing crook like Robert Byrd, then surely you can follow an intelligent man like Michael to PJM.




