February 2, 2010
The Hurt Locker is Finally Available
I've said before that The Hurt Locker is by far the best movie about the war in Iraq. I'm pleased to see that this one instead of the others—all of which are terrible—might actually win an Oscar.
If you haven't yet seen it, I strongly recommend renting it or even buying it. None of the others are even worth watching, but I splurged and picked up the Blu-ray version of this one
.
It could be about just about any war in the same way that Jarhead could be about any number of different wars. The Hurt Locker is not really a movie about the current Iraq war, at least in my opinion.
I saw it, it was good, but it dragged in a couple places (the wrestling scenes in the barracks, the main character's trip to the grocery store when he goes on leave.) and I thought it could have been 30 minutes longer. Personally, I liked Up and Up in the Air better. I don't think I have seen any of the other nominees.
"Men grow tired of sleep, love, singing and dancing sooner than of war."
Homer, the Illiad
Scott, I got the impression he was addicted to risk-taking, which explains why his compadres had a problem with him at first :)
As one reviewer said, if an entirely accurate movie was made about military life it would be titled "Hurry Up And Wait", and nobody would watch it.
On Jardhead's realism: see the Onion's take: http://www.theonion.com/content/video/ultra_realistic_modern_warfare
Excerpts from a review by an Iraq vet:
"I don't typically write book or movie reviews, but after this weekend, I really felt compelled to. This movie just stuck in my craw. But take heed: This is a review for military people. So if you've never been in the military or never been to Iraq, just stop reading this. Because if you keep reading, I'll probably ruin what could be a pretty good action flick for you. ... if you know anything about the Army, or about operations or life in Iraq, you'll be so distracted by the nonsensical sequences and plot twists that it will ruin the movie for you. It certainly did for me. To say that the scenes in this movie were "tactically unrealistic" wouldn't even begin to describe it. ..."
For the whole thing, go to:
http://www.vetvoice.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2975
As a Vietnam combat vet I found this film to be ludicrous. If you read the comments at Amazon or IMDB you'll find a lot of vets who feel the same way, and details of why.
So, does the director have an obligation to be more realistic, or to at least avoid the absurdities of this movie, which made me want to turn it off?
I think so. Otherwise it's just a fantasy, a parody of what war is really like and does us all a disservice.
Three thumbs down on this movie. The director phoned it in and we shouldn't settle for less than her best.
I think what Michael is saying is it accomplishes that.




