September 28, 2009

Hands Off Honduras

The United States government, along with the rest of the Western Hemisphere

Posted by Michael J. Totten at September 28, 2009 7:30 PM
Comments
I find it horrific that the U.S. would oppose a country's exercise of its constitution. Are we not for constitutional government? The Honduran polity accomplished an amazing feat, and proved that the Rule of Law is alive and well, and the U.S., in direct opposition to its interests both economic and strategic, wants to return a protege of Chavez to power? Honduras has performed one of the most sophisticated exercises of constitutional power, and we, the "guardian of Freedom," want to quash it? Every time I read about the Honduran situation, I'm flabbergasted by the aimless direction of our foreign policy.
Posted by: Fat Dave at September 29, 2009 6:43 am
Well, I would say that American aid should stay cut off, but for other reasons.
It is ridiculous that the US is giving any foreign aid to anyone. Those millions of $$ given to Honduras could surely buy a health insurance policy for millions of Americans who lack it. Hondurans aren
Posted by: Boojum at September 29, 2009 11:31 am
Boojum, Honduras is our ally, and as our ally we are obligated to scratch their backs if they scratch ours. And they do scratch our backs, permitting us to maintain an important military base within their borders (one which Zelaya was planning on handing over to Chavez), and by sending real, honest-to-goodness fighting men to serve alongside our own in the Middle East. Furthermore, their police and military risk their lives attempting to clamp down on the pipeline that feeds narcotics into the US. Narcotics which, in turn, feed all manner of criminal activity within our own borders, from petty theft to murder.
As for, "Hondurans aren
Posted by: Squires at September 30, 2009 2:25 am
Squires;
Yes, the decades old War on Drugs has been a spectacular success, hasn
Posted by: Boojum at September 30, 2009 10:22 am
I'm with Boojum on this one.
If we had an accurate method determining how much of our USAID money is now warmly inside personal interest-bearing off-shore accounts, even the liberals would shriek. Palestinians now seem to think foreign aid is an entitlement. Same goes for Africa...it's almost as though it's demanded as 'protection money'.
Will the World Bank and IMF ever present candid detailed accounts publicly? 'Overhead' expenses versus needy recipients' actual infusion?
In like manner, if we had an accurate way of determining the 'overhead' involved in our old USAID projects and how much of it filtered finally to individuals in genuine need, the liberals would yet again get the vapors.
Further, that pungent U.N. Oil For Food 'program' comes to mind.
How about Appalachia's needs here at home? Health care? Looming deficits here at home for decades to come?
Sorry for this blooming rant, but we need a much lower threshold for 'AID' and its attendant B.S.
Posted by: Morningside at September 30, 2009 1:40 pm
...needed amendment here:
Change the word order to read:
"...a much lower threshold for the B.S. attendant to AID".
Posted by: Morningside at September 30, 2009 4:35 pm
Who is really surprised the Obama's stance in regards to Honduras? This administration must have the worst foreign policy since the Carter administration. The Messi-uh just finished his "apologize to the world tour" with a long winded speech at the UN. He also appeased the Russians by throwing overboard the planned missile shield that would have protected our allies, Poland and the Czech Republic. Now he's willing to let the US to be led around the nose by that jew hater Ahmadinejad. The only thing he hasn't done is pull down and kiss his own has to show how sincere he is.
Finally, I'm with Boojum. Screw the Hondurans. We need to pay for illegal aliens government mandated health care here in this country. It will greatly improve US national security by having Hugo Chavez clones running Latin America It is short-sided and a waste of money to promote democracies in our hemisphere. It's a waste of money. It's not like the United States needed French assistance of arms, troops or money to be established. The colonials would've defeated the British Redcoats all by themselves.
Posted by: PeteDawg at October 1, 2009 1:21 am
"The only thing he hasn't done is pull down and kiss his own ASS has to show how sincere he is."
Posted by: PeteDawg at October 1, 2009 1:23 am
Zelayah is getting US support only because he is a wannabe leftist dictator, a bird-of-a-feather with Obama, in other words. His attempt to highjack the country was outrageous, and US pronouncements on the issue have been contemptible.
Posted by: Brian H at October 2, 2009 4:40 am
But, that is the whole point, isn't it? To bring down a constitutional, democratically elected government in favor of a leftist dictator.
Posted by: George Bruce at October 5, 2009 6:32 pm
Post a comment

Winner, The 2008 Weblog Awards, Best Middle East or Africa Blog

Winner, The 2007 Weblog Awards, Best Middle East or Africa Blog

Read my blog on Kindle









Sponsored Links

Buy a used boat

Shanghai Hotels

Yachts for sale


Recommended Reading